Innovative methodology for evaluating digital and platform technologies in public finance: will the human factor be under control?

Abstract

The article explores an approach to implementing modern digital technologies, such as blockchain solutions, in the public finance management system, considering global experience. The purpose of the article is to develop recommendations for the implementation of digital technologies into the existing public finance management mechanism of modern Ukraine to reduce objective risks from the “human factor” in corporate and public management, and, in accordance with the goal, 5 research tasks are set and solved in the article. The author analyzes key challenges in public finance management, particularly the negative impact of the human factor, and proposes solutions aimed at minimizing errors, enhancing transparency, and reducing corruption risks. Existing methodologies and frameworks for evaluating digital technologies, such as the digital maturity models of the OECD, the World Bank, ISO 37122, as well as methodologies from NIST and the EU, are examined. The study develops a new methodological approach to the comprehensive evaluation of technologies, encompassing six key criteria: process automation, transparency, security, decentralization, efficiency, and implementation cost. A technology assessment system is proposed for each criterion, along with a mathematical model for calculating an integrated indicator. This methodology enables the classification of technologies as either key or auxiliary in the context of the digital transformation of the public finance management mechanism. The article emphasizes the unique potential of decentralized technologies, such as blockchain, in minimizing the impact of the human factor. The primary contribution of the study lies in creating a scientific basis for enhancing the efficiency of public administration by introducing modern digital technologies capable of minimizing the adverse effects of the human factor. Applying the developed technology evaluation methodology will provide a well-founded means to identify priority areas for the digital transformation of Ukraine’s public finance management system, taking into account global experience and national specifics.

Downloads

Author Biography

Oleksandr Basiuk , V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Postgraduate Student, Department of Economic Policy and Management,
Education and Research Institute of Public Administration, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University,

4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

References

Almadadha, R. (2024). Blockchain Technology in Financial Accounting: Enhancing Transparency, Security, and ESG Reporting. Blockchains, 2, 312–333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/blockchains2030015

Amaglobeli, D., & others (2023). Transforming Public Finance through GovTech. Staff Discussion Note SDN2023/004, Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund. URL: http://surl.li/hswjwv

Anand, S., Ding, D., Gasti, P., O’Neal, M., Conti, M., & Balagani, K. (2020). DISPERSE: A Decentralized Architecture for Content Replication Resilient to Node Failures. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 17(1), 201–212. URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8807300

Antwi, B.O., Adelakun, B.O., & Eziefule, A.O. (2024). Transforming Financial Reporting with AI: Enhancing Accuracy and Timeliness. International Journal of Advanced Economics, 6(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.51594/ijae.v6i6.1229

BCG and JPMorgan Chase. (2022). The Future of distributed ledger technology in capital markets. URL: http://surl.li/vpedcs

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2018). Digital Innovation in Public Financial Management (PFM): Opportunities and implications for low-income countries. URL: http://surl.li/hzggfm

Board of Governors of The Federal Reserve System. (2024). Cybersecurity and Financial System. Resilience Report. URL: http://surl.li/ldsoes

Bosio, E., Hayman, G., & Dubosse, N. (2023). The Investment Case for E-Government Procurement: A Cost–Benefit Analysis. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 14(S1), 81–107. URL: http://surl.li/hsiluw

Budiandru, R., Paranita, E., & Agung, R. (2024). The Influence of Fintech Innovations, ESG Reporting, and Blockchain Technology on Financial Transparency and Accountability. The Journal of Academic Science, 1(2). URL: http://repository.uhamka.ac.id/id/eprint/37737/

Casino, F., Dasaklis, T. K., & Patsakis, C. (2019). A Systematic Literature Review of Blockchain-Based Applications: Current Status, Classification and Open Issues. Telematics and Informatics, 36, 55–81. URL: http://surl.li/bgoqmn

Ciruskabiri, S., & Varnaseri, A. (2023). Digital Transformation Planning and Frameworks. International Journal of Digital Content Management (IJDCM), 4(7), 397–433. URL: http://surl.li/jgdjtd

Conti, M., Kumar, S., Lal, C., & Ruj, S. (2018). A Survey on Security and Privacy Issues of Bitcoin. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(4). URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8369416

Corr, J. (2022). Unleashing the Power of Digital Marketing: The Digital Maturity Model Explained. URL: http://surl.li/colbbx

Daub, M., D’Emidio, T., Howard, Z., & Ungur, S. (2020). Automation in government: Harnessing technology to transform customer experience. McKinsey & Company. URL: http://surl.li/mwevxb

Deloitte. (2017). The robots are ready. Are you? Untapped advantage in your digital workforce. URL: http://surl.li/cpcsep

Dhaduk, H. (2023). CTO’s Guide to the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) of a Digital Product. URL: http://surl.li/mcrtbj

e-Estonia. (n.d.). Facts & Figures. URL: https://e-estonia.com/facts-and-figures/

European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain union legislative acts. Brussels, 21.4.2021 COM(2021) 206 final 2021/0106(COD). URL: http://surl.li/cjlbge

Grant Thornton. (2015). Innovation in Public Financial Management. URL: http://surl.li/ccrdit

Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence: On the Past, Present, and Future of Artificial Intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4). URL: http://surl.li/hyxzsx

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / the World Bank. (2017). Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) and Blockchain. FinTech Note, 1. URL: http://surl.li/xzwdws

ISO/IEC 27001:2022. (n.d.). Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection, Information security management systems, requirements. URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/27001

Kane, G.C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A.N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, Not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press. URL: http://surl.li/ctlqwk

Kemboi, H., & Muturi, W. (2017). Effect of automation of financial management systems on financial performance of county government of Trans-Nzoia. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 4(2), 352–359. URL: http://surl.li/yppzng

Kioko, S., & Marlowe, J. (2023). Financial Strategy for Public Managers. (4th ed.). URL: https://uw.pressbooks.pub/financialstrategy/

KPMG. (2024). Cybersecurity considerations 2024: Government and public sector. URL: http://surl.li/hktvve

Kristiningrum, E., & Kusumo, H. (2020). Indicators of Smart City Using SNI ISO 37122:2019. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 1096 012013. URL: http://surl.li/srzsjw

McKinsey & Company. (2017). A future that works: automation, employment, and productivity. URL: http://surl.li/oyhkul

McKinsey Digital. (2015). Building up your digital quotient: How to harness digital to accelerate business performance. URL: http://surl.li/fmxray

Merlec, M.M., & In, H.P. (2024). Blockchain-Based Decentralized Storage Systems for Sustainable Data Self-Sovereignty: A Comparative Study. Sustainability, 16, 7671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177671

Middleton, E., Stewart, J., Kenny, A., & Esmyot, J. (2023). Making public finance digital: Challenges to the emerging digital public financial management paradigm. ODI Working Paper. URL: http://surl.li/xvjmjx

Mills, D., Wang, K., Malone, B., Ravi, A., Marquardt, J., Chen, C., Badev, A., Brezinski, T., Fahy, L., Liao, K., Kargenian, V., Ellithorpe, M., Ng, W., & Baird, M. (2016). Distributed ledger technology in payments, clearing, and settlement. Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2016-095. Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2016.095

Musaib, A. (2024). Does Automation Improve Financial Reporting? Evidence from Internal Controls. URL: http://surl.li/cqxort

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (n.d.). NIST Risk Management Framework. URL: https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/risk-management/publications

OECD. (2020). The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework: Six dimensions of a Digital Government. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 02, Paris: OECD Publishing. URL: http://surl.li/gwebqc

Omonov, M., & Ahn, Y. (2024). Algorithmic government approach: automating public services and supporting civil servants with ai technologies. Interpretation and Researches, 2(24). URL: http://surl.li/crnljh

Paso, L., Pattanayak, S., del Uña, G., & Tourpe, H. (2023). Digital Solutions Guidelines for Public Financial Management. IMF Technical Notes and Manuals. URL: http://surl.li/tqzdda

Peterson, S. (2006). Automating Public Financial Management in Developing Countries. HKS Working Paper No. RWP06-043. John F. Kennedy School of Government or Harvard University. URL: http://surl.li/vspwnb

Ross, J. W., Moloney, K.G., & Sebastian, I. M. (2017). How big old companies navigate digital transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(3), 197–213. URL: http://surl.li/xjsfzu

The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. (2021). GovTech Maturity Index: The State of Public Sector Digital Transformation. URL: http://surl.li/iyijmk

The World Bank. (2019). Disaster Response: A Public Financial Management Review Toolkit. URL: http://surl.li/wcqzyt

Tiago, O., & Martins, M.F. (2011). Literature Review of Information Technology Adoption Models at Firm Level. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110–121. URL: http://surl.li/rahskx

Upcore Technologies. (2024, May 22). A Complete Guide to Digital Maturity Models: Assess and Elevate Your Transformation. URL: https://www.upcoretech.com/insights/digital-maturity-models/

Walenia-Lucia A., & Bednarova L. (2015). Implementation of quality management systems in public administration. Journal of environmental protection Safety, Education and Management, 6(3). URL: http://surl.li/jxfvot

Weill, P., Stephanie, L., Woerner, & Sebastian, I. (2023). Future Ready Transformations Pay Off But Often Stall. The European Business Review, 8. URL: http://surl.li/yhpvwx

Ya’acob, N.S., Hamid, M.A., & Alrazi, B.B. (2018). Transparency And Accountability In Public Sector Financial Management System. Interdisciplinary Sustainability Perspectives: Engaging Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Concerns, vol 44. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 212–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.07.02.22

Published
2024-12-30
How to Cite
Basiuk , O. (2024). Innovative methodology for evaluating digital and platform technologies in public finance: will the human factor be under control?. Pressing Problems of Public Administration, 2(65), 316-346. https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2024-2-17
Section
Public Service: Aspects and Practices