Macroeconomic effects of centralized and decentralized digital platforms for business activities recovery in Ukraine

Keywords: information platforms, national economy, platform economy, public administration, Ukraine’s recovery, reconstruction.

Abstract

The paper explores the macroeconomic effects of the development of centralized and decentralized digital platforms and their role in reviving business activity in Ukraine. The authors analyse the transformational impact of platforms on traditional sectors of the economy, the labour market, and the system of public governance. Special attention is paid to the synergy of platforms with other digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence, big data analytics, and the Internet of Things. The article conceptualizes the platform economy as a new stage of capitalism, characterized by a shift in emphasis from the production of goods and services to the creation of a technological infrastructure for the interaction of economic agents. Platforms act as intermediaries that provide a link between producers and consumers, suppliers and customers, employers and employees. They create conditions for the realization of network effects and the reduction of transaction costs and information asymmetry. Using the automotive industry as an example, the authors examine changes in business models under the influence of the “mobility as a service” concept and the sharing economy. The authors also investigate the phenomenon of policy isomorphism, when political institutions begin to imitate the logic of platforms’ functioning. Based on the analysis of international experience and Ukrainian cases of platformization in retail, transport, and financial services, the authors offer recommendations for state policy to stimulate the development of the platform economy in Ukraine. In particular, they emphasize the need to adapt the regulatory environment, develop digital infrastructure and skills, support domestic innovations, and ensure the inclusiveness of platform services. The article has an interdisciplinary character and will be of interest to researchers, policymakers, and practitioners dealing with the digital transformation of the economy and society. The authors conclude that the successful transformation of Ukraine’s economy towards a more platform-oriented model will depend on the ability of all stakeholders business, government, and consumers – to effectively respond to these challenges and take advantage of the opportunities offered by the platform economy.

Downloads

Author Biographies

Igor Dunayev, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Doctor of Science in public administration, Professor,
Professor of Economic Policy and Management  Department,
Education and Research Institute of Public Administration, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University,

4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Nataliia Lugovenko, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

PhD in Public Administration, Associate Professor,
Associate Professor of the Department of Economic Policy and Management,
Education and Research Institute of Public Administration, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University,

4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Nataliia Gryshina, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

PhD in Public Administration, Associate Professor,

Associate Professor of the Department of Law, National Security and European Integration,
Education and Research Institute of Public Administration, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University,

4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

References

Dunayev, I., & Kovalenko, M. (2022). New traces of regulation of information platforms and a platform-based economy for the new public good. Pressing Problems of Public Administration, 2(61), 6–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2022-2-01 [in Ukrainian]

Kud, A.A. (2023). Global problem of growing economic inequality and tokenization of assets as a prospect of its solution. Economic Analisys, 33(2), 7–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2023.02.007 [in Ukrainian]

Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., & Kerr, W. (2015). Networks and the Macroeconomy:

An Empirical Exploration. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 30. URL: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/685961

Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188–2244. URL: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10.1086/705716

Barak-Corren, N., & Kariv-Teitelbaum, Y. (2021). Behavioral responsive regulation: Bringing together responsive regulation and behavioral public policy. Regulation & Governance, 15, S163–S182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12429

Digital Markets Act: Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, 18 July 2022. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj

Digital Services Act: Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC

(Digital Services Act) (Text with EEA relevance). URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj

Fu, X., Avenyo, E., & Ghauri, P. (2021). Digital platforms and develop ment: a survey of the literature. Innovation and Development, 11(2–3), 303–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2021.1975361

Hemesath, S., & Tepe, M. (2024). Multidimensional preference for technology risk regulation: The role of political beliefs, technology attitudes, and national innovation cultures. Regulation & Governance, 18(4), 1264–1283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12578

Kruk, S., Toonen, H., & Bush, S. (2024). Digital sustainability assurance governing global value chains: The case of aquaculture. Regulation & Governance, 18(4), 1153–1170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12571

Lafuente, E., Ács, Z., & Szerb, L. (2022). Analysis of the digital platform economy around the world: A network DEA model for identifying policy priorities. Journal of Small Business Management, 62(2), 847–891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2022.2100895

Laux, J., Wachter, S., & Mittelstadt, B. (2023). Trustworthy artificial intelligence and the European Union AI act: On the conflation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk. Regulation & Governance, 18(1), 3–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12512

Liu, P. (2020). Positive, negative, ambivalent, or indifferent? Exploring the structure of public attitudes toward self-driving vehicles on public roads. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 142, 27–38.

Marsden, Ph., & Podszun, R. (2020). Restoring Balance to Digital Competition – Sensible Rules, Effective Enforcement. Berlin. URL: http://surl.li/oconug

OECD. (2020). Summary of Discussion of the Hearing on Competition Economics of Digital Ecosystems. Annex to the Summary Record of the 134th Meeting of Competition Committee held on 1–3 December 2020. Paris: OECD. URL: https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/M(2020)2/ANN5/FINAL/en/pdf

Paul, R. (2024). European artificial intelligence “trusted throughout the world”: Risk-based regulation and the fashioning of a competitive common AI market. Regulation & Governance, 18(4), 1065–1082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12563

Stockmann, D. (2022). Tech companies and the public interest: the role of the state in governing social media platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 26(1), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2032796

UNCTAD. (2017). The ‘New’ Digital Economy and Development. UNCTAD Technical Notes on ICT for Development. No. TN/UNCTAD/ICT4D/08. New York: UNCTAD. URL: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tn_unctad_ict4d08_en.pdf

WEF. (2017). Impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution on Supply Chains. Geneva: WEF. URL: http://surl.li/blruqn

WEF. (2022). The Future of Capital Markets: Democratization of Retail Investing. Geneva: WEF. URL: http://surl.li/nfzyiw

Published
2024-12-30
How to Cite
Dunayev, I., Lugovenko, N., & Gryshina, N. (2024). Macroeconomic effects of centralized and decentralized digital platforms for business activities recovery in Ukraine. Pressing Problems of Public Administration, 2(65), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2024-2-04
Section
Mechanisms of Public Administration