Using information policy tools for public governance in emergency situations
Abstract
The article explores the unique aspects of leveraging information policy tools to ensure effective public administration during emergencies. Through an in-depth analysis of international practices in utilizing modern information and communication technologies to facilitate communication between authorities and citizens during crises–particularly in the United States, the United Kingdom, Poland, Germany, and Japan–the author identifies key principles and mechanisms for organizing information exchange under emergency conditions. The study delineates three critical phases of informational support during emergencies: (1) the preparation and early warning phase to alert the population about potential threats, (2) the operational response phase focused on mitigating the immediate impacts of the crisis, and (3) the recovery and normalization phase following the resolution of the emergency. The author emphasizes the vital importance of clearly defining roles and responsibilities among various government bodies in crisis communications, alongside the necessity of designating a central coordinating authority responsible for developing and implementing a comprehensive information policy. The article thoroughly examines the advantages and limitations of both traditional and modern channels and tools for information exchange, including official government websites, social media platforms, messaging applications, and specialized mobile apps. Based on the identified challenges in the interaction between public administration and the population during emergencies in Ukraine, the author proposes a set of priority measures to enhance effectiveness. These include the development and implementation of a national communication strategy for emergencies, strengthening interagency coordination and clarifying responsibilities, leveraging modern digital technologies more actively, and establishing high-quality, real-time feedback mechanisms with citizens. The conclusions underscore the necessity of developing a systemic national information policy as an essential component for improving crisis public administration, integrating global best practices with the unique realities of Ukraine. The results of the study can be used in the practical activities of public authorities to build effective crisis communication systems and increase public confidence in government actions during emergencies.
Downloads
References
Bakumenko, V.D. (2012). Public administration decisions. Kyiv: VPTs AMU. [in Ukrainian].
Bieliakov, K.I. (2019). Informatization in Ukraine: problems of organizational, legal and scientific support. Kyiv: KVITs. [in Ukrainian].
Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. (2022). Dynamics of socio-political attitudes in Ukraine: March 2022. Retrieved from https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1113 [in Ukrainian].
Dreshpak, V.M. (2015). Komunikatsii v publichnomu upravlinni [Communications in public administration]. Dnipro: DRIDU NADU. [in Ukrainian]
Kravchenko, S.O. (2019). Public administration reforms: theoretical and methodological substantiation and directions of implementation. Kyiv: NADU. [in Ukrainian].
Lipkan, V., & Diorditsa, I. (2021). National cybersecurity system as an integral part of the national security system of Ukraine. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo – Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 5, 174–180. [in Ukrainian].
Romat, Ye., Havrylets, O., & Bilovodska, O. (2021). Marketing in public administration. Kyiv: Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics. [in Ukrainian].
Pocheptsov, H.H. (2020). Strategy: A Toolkit for Managing the Future. Kyiv: Altpress.
Rizun, V.V. (2020). Theory of mass communication. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi tsentr «Prosvita». [in Ukrainian].
BBK – German Civil Protection Association. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.bbk.bund.de/EN/Home/home_node.html
Coombs, W.T. (2023). Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding (5th ed.). London: Sage Publishing.
Anderson, K.R., Elbel, M.E., Chandler, R.C., etc. (2021). Crisis Communications:
A Casebook Approach. New York: Routledge.
Heath, R.L. (2020). Crisis Communication: Defining the Beast and De-marginalizing Key Publics. The Handbook of Crisis Communication, p. 1–13. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Horsley, S. (2020). Communicating in a Crisis. Communication and Organizational Knowledge: Contemporary Issues for Theory and Practice, р. 289–310). New York: Routledge.
Krasowski, A. (2020). How social media users in Poland are fighting disinformation relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. Medium. URL: https://medium.com/polis-lse/how-social-media-users-in-poland-are-fighting-disinformation-relating-to-the-covid-19-pandemic-fc0beba9c30
Oskin, B. (2021). Japan Earthquake & Tsunami of 2011: Facts and Information. Live Science. URL: https://www.livescience.com/39110-japan-2011-earthquake-tsunami-facts.html
Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2020). The (in)security of smart cities: Vulnerabilities, risks, mitigation, and prevention. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(2), 47–65.
Zoonen, L. (2016). Privacy concerns in smart cities. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 472–480.
Adini, B. (2015). The role of the On-Site Emergency Management Team (EMTC) in preparedness and response to disasters. Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal, 1(1), 15–17.
Magen, C. (2019). Battlefield information management: The case of the IDF. Defence Studies, 18 (3), 344–362.
Lai, A. Y. (2012). Towards a collaborative cross-border disaster management:
A comparative analysis of voluntary organizations in Singapore and Hong Kong. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 14 (3), 217–233.
Kwan, E. (2019). Crisis Communication Strategies. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford University Press. https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-397
Duit, A. (2021). Resilience thinking: Lessons for public administration. Public Administration, 94 (2), 364–380.
Kerry, J. (2013). Digital Diplomacy: Adapting Our Diplomatic Engagement. U.S. Department of State. https://2009-2017.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2013/05/209969.htm