Recommendations for implementing distributed ledger technology (blockchain) in the public sector of Ukraine based on global experience
Abstract
Integrating new technologies such as distributed ledger technology into government systems is a multifaceted process characterized by numerous potential benefits, associated costs, and risks. Previous and existing pilot implementations of blockchain-based software solutions in the public sector have demonstrated that this technology can have varying impacts depending on contextual factors, including the specific type of chosen government service. Furthermore, within each distinct area of public services, the implementation of e-governance technologies can yield different outcomes for various stakeholders, including government entities, public servants, and citizens.
Therefore, this article provides a review and analysis of global experiences with the utilization of distributed ledger technology in various domains of the public sector. To achieve this, several countries with advanced expertise in e-governance and the implementation of distributed ledger technology-based solutions were identified. Drawing from the experiences of these nations and considering the unique features, advantages, maturity level of blockchain technology, and existing solutions based on it, general recommendations were formulated regarding the implementation of distributed ledger technology (blockchain) in Ukraine’s public sector.
Downloads
References
Allessie, D., Sobolewski, M., Vaccari, L. Blockchain for digital Government.
An assessment of pioneering implementations in public services. 2019. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332901048_Blockchain_for_digital_government_An_assessment_of_pioneering_implementations_in_public_services
Amstad, M., Huang, B., Morgan, P.J., & Shirai, S. (2019). Fintech, cryptoassets, and Central Bank Digital Currency in the Republic of Korea, is. 1018. URL: www.adbi.org
Andrews, Seoul. (2019). The Blockchain city. Cities Today. URL: https://cities-today.com/seoul-the-blockchain-city/
Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C.G., Giannakidou, I., Mavridis, N. (2016). Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare. gov website. Gov Inf Quart. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0740624X15000799?via%3Dihub
Australian Government. (2023). Australia’s National Blockchain Roadmap. URL: https://www.services-exports.gov.au/progress/australias-national-blockchain-roadmap
Australian Government. (2023). The Data and Digital Government Strategy. URL: https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/
Bank of England, HM Treasury. The digital pound:a new form of money for households and businesses? Consultation Paper. 2023. URL: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/paper/2023/the-digital-pound-consultation-working-paper.pdf?la=en&hash=5CC053D3820DCE2F40656E772D9105FA10C654EC
Bank of England. (2021). Bank of England publishes policy for omnibus accounts in RTGS. URL: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2021/april/boe-publishes-policy-for-omnibus-accounts-in-rtgs
Bank of England. (2021). Bank of England statement on Central Bank Digital Currency. URL: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2021/april/bank-of-england-statement-on-central-bank-digital-currency
Basiuk, O. (2022). Digital technologies in optimization of the budget process: best international experience and conclusions for Ukraine. Pressing problems of public administration, no. 1 (60), 117–132.
Basyuk, O. (2022). Analysis of the budgetary policy of Ukraine taking into account the experience of using digital technologies. Bulletin of Postgraduate Education, is. 19(48). Series «Social and Behavioural Sciences». URL: http://umo.edu.ua/images/content/nashi_vydanya/visnyk_PO/19_48_2022/social/Bulletin_19_48_Social_and_behavioral_sciences_Basiuk.pdf
Burger, C., Kuhlmann, A., Richard, P.R., Weinmann, J. (2016). Blockchain in the energy transition. A survey among decision-makers in the German energy industry. German Energy Agency, May 2020, 41. URL: www.esmt.org
Cagigas, D., Clifton, J., Diaz-Fuentes, D., Fernández-Gutiérrez, M. & Harpes, C. (2023). Blockchain in government: toward an evaluation framework. Policy Design and Practice. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2023.2230702
Cha, S. (2021). South Korea to issue blockchain-protected Digital ‘vaccine passports’. Reuters. URL: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-southkorea-idUSKBN2BO43W
Choi, Y. (2021). Blockchain, artificial intelligence and big data: how Korea Customs Service leverages technology to supervise e-commerce. URL: https://mag.wcoomd.org/magazine/wco-news-96/blockchain-artificial-intelligence-and-big-data-korea/
Commonwealth Bank. (2018). Making Money Smart. URL: https://www.commbank.com.au/content/dam/commbank-assets/business/industries/2018-11/making_money_smart_report.pdf
Cooper, H., Hill, T., Kangalingam, S. (2022). PwC Australia. Around the world in government blockchain. URL: https://www.pwc.com.au/digitalpulse/government-blockchain-use-cases.html
CSIRO & CBA. (2018). Making Money Smart. URL: https://data61.csiro.au/en/Our-Research/Our-Work/SmartMoney
Digital Transformation Agency. Blockchain case study: Australian Taxation Office. Digital Transformation Agency. URL: https://www.dta.gov.au/help-and-advice/technology/blockchain/do-you-need-blockchain/blockchain-case-studies/blockchain-case-study-australian-taxation-office
Digital Transformation Agency. Digital Transformation Strategy 2018-2025. URL: https://www.dta.gov.au/digital-transformation-strategy/digital-transformation-strategy-2018-2025
Dunayev, I., Byelova, L., Kud, A., Rodchenko, V. (2023). Implementing the “Government as a platform” concept: the assessment method and an optimal humancentered structure to address technological challenges. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, no. 2/13 (122). URL: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/275613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.
275613
Dunayev, I., Petrovska, I., Safronova, O. (2022). Development of methods for evaluating the effectiveness of smart cities under the conditions of digitalization of city governance. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, no. 3/13 (117). URL : http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/265017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.260304
Dziundziuk, V., Dziundziuk, B. (2022). Public administration using blockchain technology and platforms: new opportunities. Pressing Problems of Public Administration, no. 2 (61), 104–115. URL: https://periodicals.karazin.ua/apdu/article/view/21848/20248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2022-2-07
E-Democracy & open data. E-Governance Estonia. URL: https://e-estonia.com/solutions/e-governance/e-democracy/.
Eesti Pank. (2020). Eesti Pank ran an experiment to investigate the technological possibilities of a central bank digital currency based on blockchain. URL: https://www.eestipank.ee/en/press/eesti-pank-ran-experiment-investigate-technological-possibilities-central-bank-digital-currency-13122021
Electronic Trade Documents Act. (2023). URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/38/enacted/data.pdf
Estonian Tech & IT solutions. This is the story of the world’s most advanced digital society. URL: https://digiexpo.e-estonia.com/story-of-e-estonia/
Guardtime. KSI Blockchain Timestamping. Guardtime. URL: https://guardtime.com/timestamping
Hall, I. (2023). Digital pound ‘likely to be needed in future’: UK CBDC consultation launches. URL: https://www.globalgovernmentfintech.com/digital-pound-likely-to-be-needed-in-future-uk-cbdc-consultation-launches/
Healthcare – e-Estonia. URL: https://e-estonia.com/solutions/healthcare/
HM Treasury. (2022). Government sets out plan to make UK a global cryptoasset technology hub. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-sets-out-plan-to-make-uk-a-global-cryptoasset-technology-hub
Kattel, R., Mergel, I. (2019). Estonia’s Digital Transformation. Great Policy Successes. 143–160. URL: https://academic.oup.com/book/42635/chapter/358101931
Kitsing, M. (2008). Success Without Strategy: E-Government Development in Estonia. Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Partnerships for Public Innovation, DG.O 2008, Montreal, Canada, May 18–21, no. 3(1). 86–106. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221584877_Explaining_the_e-government_success_in_Estonia
Korol, V., Dmytryk, O., Karpenko, O., Riadinska, V., Basiuk, O. (2022). Elaboration of recommendations on the development of the state internal audit system when applying the digital technologies Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, no. 1 (13 (115)), 39–48.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.252424
KSI ® blockchain in Estonia. Frequently Asked Questions. 2020. URL: https://e-estonia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020mar-faq-ksi-blockchain-1-1.pdf
Kud, A. (2021). Decentralized Information Platforms in Public Governance: Reconstruction of the Modern Democracy or Comfort Blinding?, International Journal of Public Administration. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1993905
Kud, A. (2022). Methodological approach to creating the mechanism for modernizing the public governance system based on decentralized information platforms. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32405/2522-9931-2022-21(50)-160-220
Martinson, P. (2019). Estonia: the digital republic secured by blockchain. Pwc, 2019, 1–12. URL: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/legal/tech/assets/estonia-the-digital-republic-secured-by-blockchain.pdf
Mcarthy, N. (2018). The Countries That Trust Their Government Most And Least. Fobes. 2018. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2018/01/22/the-countries-that-trust-their-government-most-and-least-infographic/?sh=507716f2777a
OECD Data. (2021). Australia. OECD: OECD Data. URL: https://data.oecd.org/australia.htm
OECD Data. (2022). Gross domestic spending on R&D. URL: https://data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm
Pew Research Center. (2023). Public Trust in Government: 1958-2023. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2018/01/22/the-countries-that-trust-their-government-most-and-least-infographic/?sh=507716f2777a
Politou, E., Casino, F., Alepis, E., & Patsakis, C. (2019). Blockchain Mutability: Challenges and Proposed Solutions. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, April 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2019.2949510
Schlatt, V., Guggenberger, T., Schmid, J., Urbach, N. (2023). Attacking the trust machine: developing an information systems research agenda for blockchain cybersecurity. Int J Inf Manage. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0268401222000019?via%3Dihub
Shumba, C. (2023). Coindesk. U.K. Move to Digitize Trade Documents Could Rely on Blockchain, Government Says. URL: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/07/27/uk-move-to-digitize-trade-documents-could-rely-on-blockchain-government-says/
Sullivan, C., Burger, E. (2017). E-residency and blockchain. Computer law and security review, no. 33 (4), 470–481. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0267364917300845?via%3Dihub
The Law Commission. (2021). Smart contracts. URL: https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/smart-contracts/#:~:text=We%20published%20our%20advice%20to,use%20of%20smart%20legal%20contracts
The Law Commission. (2021). Smart legal contracts. Advice to Government. URL: https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/lawcom-prod-storage-11jsxou24uy7q/uploads/2021/11/Smart-legal-contracts-accessible.pdf
The Legal 500. United Kingdom: Blockchain. (2022). URL: https://www.legal500.com/guides/chapter/united-kingdom-blockchain/
The Reserve Bank of Australia, The Digital Finance CRC. Australian CBDC Pilot for Digital Finance Innovation. (2023). URL: https://www.rba.gov.au/payments-and-infrastructure/central-bank-digital-currency/pdf/australian-cbdc-pilot-for-digital-finance-innovation-project-report.pdf
UN E-Government Knowledgebase. (2022). URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/
UN E-Government Knowledgebase. E-Government Development Index. Country data. (2022). URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Data-Center
UN E-Government Knowledgebase. E-Government Development Index. Country data. Estonia. (2022). URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/57-Estonia
UN E-Government Knowledgebase. E-Government Development Index. Country data. Republic of Korea. (2022). URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/138-Republic-of-Korea
UN E-Government Knowledgebase. E-Government Development Index. Country data. Australia. (2022). URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/9-Australia
UN E-Government Knowledgebase. E-Government Development Index. Country data. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. (2022). URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/182-United-Kingdom-of-Great-Britain-and-Northern-Ireland
Wong, P., Chia, F., Kiu, M., Lou, E. (2020). Potential integration of blockchain technology into smart sustainable city (SSC) developments: a systematic review. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-09-2020-0140
Young, J. (2019). Here’s how the gov’t of Seoul is using a public blockchain in the real-world. CCN.com. URL: https://www.ccn.com/heres-how-the-govt-of-seoul-is-using-a-public-blockchain-in-the-real-world/
Young-sil, Y. (2018). Korean gov’t Unveils blockchain technology development strategy. Businesskorea. URL: http://www.businesskorea.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=23184
Zelenovic, A. (2020). Publicis Sapient. Blockchain: Now a Reality and Rising Rapidly in the Public Sector. URL: https://www.publicissapient.com/insights/blockchain-now-a-reality
Zhao, W. (2018). Korean government to LEAD 6 Blockchain pilots with $9 million fund. CoinDesk. URL: https://www.coindesk.com/korean-government-lead-6-blockchain-pilots-9-million-fund
