LEGAL INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF PUBLIC GOVERNANCE WITHIN RECENT SOCIAL TRANSFORMATIONS
Abstract
The article substantiates the expediency of applying the neoinstitutional approach to the study of legal institutionalization processes under the conditions
of social changes, defines the role of legal institutionalization in public governance considering
some factors promoting or, on the contrary, hinder effectiveness of legal institutions.
The neo-institutional approach is a relevant methodological basis for the study of the
development of the legal system under the conditions of social transformations and reforming of
state administration. In the concept of formal institutionalization, legal institutionalization means
the formation of new legal institutions, the formalization of certain social relations and social ties.
However, revealing the essence of legal institutionalization from the formal side is far from the only
approach related to the perception of institutionalization as a law-making phenomenon. In opposition
to the concept of formalization, ideas about the decisive role of the substantive component in the
institutional process are put forward. According to this theory, the creation of legal institutions does
not depend on their formal recognition by the legislator. This actually means that legal institutions
are formed and developed in parallel with regulative legal acts, but the form of law is not perceived
as an indicator of the existence of one or another institution. The basis of institutionalization
is the legal relation itself which is combined into certain types based on systemic features In connection to the expansion of the essence of legal regulation, the purpose of legal
institutionalization has changed. As a result, it is possible to explain the emergence of numerous
institutions which do not have any formal legal consolidation. In order to understand the nature and
logic of the development of institutions, it is necessary to study the factors that guide society, citizens,
and social groups in their actions, that is, to study institutions. The success of institutionalization
mainly depends on national specifics and the state of socio-economic development of the country.
The article has a theoretical-methodological character, and the material presented in it can
be the basis for the study of legal institutionalization in various spheres of public administration.
Downloads
References
Barabash, O.O. (2018). Pryroda instytutsionalizatsii prav liudyny: zahalnoteoretychnyi analiz [The nature of institutionalization of human rights: general theoretical analysis]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav, no. 4, 3–10 [in Ukrainian].
Bashtannyk, O.V. (2013). Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady formuvannia polityko-instytutsiinoi paradyhmy: zakonomirnosti ta tendentsii rozvytku [The peculiarities of scientific research whithin old institutionalism of the politicalinstitutional paradigm development patterns and trends]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi Academii Derzhavnogo Upravlinnia Pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy, no. 11, 13–21[in Ukrainian].
Ben, O.T. (2012). Instytutsionalizatsiia: teoretychna interpretatsiia poniattia [Institutionalization: theoretical interpretation of the term]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia sotsiolohichna. – Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Sociology, is. 6, 181–190 [in Ukrainian].
Kovalova, T.V. (2005). Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy. Kharkiv: Folio [in Ukrainian].
Haponenko, V. (2019). Heoinctytutsionalizm yak metod doclidzhennia demokpatyzatsii politychnoi cyctemy Ukpainy. European political and law discourse, no. 4, 38–43 [in Ukrainian].
Holub, V.V. (2019). Upravlinnia publichnoiu politykoiu: kontseptualizatsiia poniattia v umovakh suchasnykh vyklykiv [Public policy administration: conceptualization of the concept in modern challenges]. Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia – Theory and Practice of Public Administration, no. 4(67), 17–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34213/tp.19.04.02 [in Ukrainian].
Horbatenko, V.P. (2007). Instytut. Velykyi entsyklopedychnyi yurydychnyi slovnyk. Shemshuchenka, Yu.S. (Ed.). Kyiv: TOV Vyd-vo “Yryd. dumka” [in Ukrainian].
Karmazina, M., Shurbovana, O. (2006). “Instytut” ta “instytutsiia”: problema roz riznennia poniat. Politychnyi menedment, no. 4, 10–19 [in Ukrainian].
Klipkova, H.O. (2016). Diiespromozhnist derzhavnykh instytutiv: postradianskyi aspekt.Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv: Khark. nats. un-t imeni V.N. Karazina [in Ukrainian].
Kovalоva, T.V. (2020). Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady derzhavnoi movnoi polityky Ukrainy v umovakh suspilnykh transformatsii [Theoretical and methodological principles of the state language policy of Ukraine in the conditions of social transformations]. Doctor’s thesis. Khakiv: KRI NAPA [in Ukrainian].
Kolodii, A. (2011). Neoinstytutsionalizm ta yoho piznavalni mozhlyvosti v politychnykh doslidzhenniakh [New institutionalizm and its cognitive possibilities in political studies]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia filosofsko-politolohichni studii – Visnuk of the Lviv University. Series Philos.-Political Studies, is. 1, 129–139 [in Ukrainian].
Korzhenko, V.V., Meltiukhova, N.M. (2013). Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady reformuvannia derzhavnoho upravlinnia v transformatsiinomu suspilstvi [Theoretical and Methodological Basis of Public Administration Reformation in Transformational Society]. Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia – Theory and Practice of Public Administration, is. 2 (41), 20–27 [in Ukrainian].
Mykhnenko, A.M., Makarenko, E.M., Makarenko, N.H. (2011). Instytualizatsiia suspilnoho rozvytku [Institutionalization of social development]. Kyiv: NADU [in Ukrainian].
Mykhnenko, A.M., Makarenko, E.M. (2011). Instytutsializatsiia. Entsyklopediia derzhavnoho upravlinnia: u 8 t.; Nats. akad. derzh. upr. pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy. Kovbasiuk, Yu.V. and others (Eds.). T. 1. Teoriia derzhavnoho upravlinnia; Kniaziev, V.M., Rozputenko, I.V. and others (Eds.) (nauk.-red. kolehiia). Kyiv: NADU, 258–261 [in Ukrainian].
Mykhnenko, A.M. (2011). Instytut sotsialnyi. Entsyklopediia derzhavnoho upravlinnia:u 8 t.; Nats. akad. derzh. upr. pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy. Kovbasiuk, Yu.V. and others (Eds.). T. 1. Teoriia derzhavnoho upravlinnia; Kniaziev, V.M., Rozputenko, I.V. and others (Eds.) (nauk.-red. kolehiia). Kyiv: NADU, 263–264 [in Ukrainian].
Perehuda, Ye.V. (2016). Politychni idei predstavnykiv neoinstytutsionalizmu. Politychna dumka XX – pochatku XXI stolit: metodolohichnyi i doktrynalnyi pidkhody: pidruch.: u 2-kh t. Lviv: Novyi Svit-2000. T. 1. Metodolohichnyi pidkhid, 14–36 [in Ukrainian].
Petroie, O. (2011). Instytutsionalizatsiia. Entsyklopediia derzhavnoho upravlinnia: u 8 t.; Nats. akad. derzh. upr. pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy. Kovbasiuk, Yu.V. and others (Eds.). T. 1. Teoriia derzhavnoho upravlinnia; Kniaziev, V.M., Rozputenko, I.V. and others (Eds.) (nauk.-red. kolehiia). Kyiv: NADU, 264–265 [in Ukrainian].
Petroie, O. (2012). Instytutsionalnyi pidkhid yak metodolohichna osnova doslidzhennia ta analizu sotsialnykh system u derzhavnomu upravlinni. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats NADU pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy – Journal of research papers of the National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine, no. 2(23), 208–220 [in Ukrainian].
Plotnytska, I.M. (2015). Vykorystannia paronimiv v upravlinskykh tekstakh. Humanity, computers and communication, 22−24 april 2015, 103−104 Lviv [in Ukrainian].
Rudakevych, O. (2015). Natsionalna politychna kultura. Suchasna politychna leksyka: entsykloped. slovnyk-dovidnyk. Vdovychyn, I.Ya., Uhryn, L.Ya., Shypunov, H.V. and others (Eds). Lviv: “Novyi Svit-2000” [in Ukrainian].
Tishchenko, Yu.V. (2019). Instytutsionalizatsiia pravovoho mifu yak oznaka suchasnoi derzhavy [Institutionalisation of legal myth as a feature of modern state]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal, no. 6, 457–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2019-6/114 [in Ukrainian].
Chaltseva, O.M. (2017). Publichna polityka: teoretychnyi vymir i suchasna praktyka. Vinnytsia: FOP Baranovska, T.P. [in Ukrainian].
Acemoglu, Daron and Matthew O. Jackson. (2014). Social Norms and the Enforcement of Laws. NBER Working Paper 20369, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
Braithwaite, John and Peter Drahos. (2000). Global Business Regulation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, Terence, C. and Gregory Shaffer. (2015). Transnational Legal Orders. Cambridge Studies in Law and Society Series. New York: Cambridge University Press.
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1984). The new institutionalism: organisational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, vol. 78, no. 3, 734–749. URL:http://online.sfsu.edu/sguo/Renmin/June%2021_institutionalism/New%2 0Institutionalism_James%20March.pdf.
Morawski, W. (1998). Zmiana instytucjonalna. Społeczeństwo. Gospodarka. Polityka, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Warszawa.
Platteau, Jean-Philippe. (2000). Institutions, Social Norms, and Economic Development. Fundamentals of Development Economics Series. London: Routledge.
Tamanaha, B.Z. (1993). The Folly of the Social Scientific Concept of the Legal Pluralizm. Journal of Law and Sosiety, no. 20 (2), 192–217.
Tyler, Tom R. (2006). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Weber, Max. (1965). Politics as a Vocation. Philadelphia: Fortress Pre
