Analytical Understanding of the Stages of Institutionalization of Security in Contemporary Western Sociological Thought

Lyudmila Kalashnikova Faculty of Sociology Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, 10, 68 Marines Str., Nikolaev, 54003, Ukraine, lvkalashnikova198@gmail.com https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9573-5955

Keywords: security sociology, institutionalization, public safety, national security, personal security

Abstract

The article analyzes the stages of institutionalization of security in contemporary Western sociology sociological thought. In particular, the defined conditions of formation of sociology and social security knowledge of security problems presented in the works of the classics of sociology. It characterized the first period of the security sociology feature of which is the emergence of international security sociology as an independent scientific discipline. As part of this phase are analyzed ideas B. Brodie, H. Kahn, T. Schelling, A. Wohlstetter, A. Wolfers. Outlines the characteristics of the second stage of institutionalization of security Sociology - expanding concepts of the subjective dimension of security, disclosure of social and cultural aspects of the sense of security / insecurity in the mass consciousness in a break with tradition and turbulent social processes. We analyzed the works of K. Booth, R. Jones, B. Buzan, A. Waiver, S. Bauman, A. Giddens, U. Beck, N. Luhmann, P. Sztompka. The prospects of the development of the security of sociology at the third ( modern ) stage, including by expanding the definition of a domain, a new understanding of human security of life caused by the rapid changes in the international relations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lyudmila Kalashnikova, Faculty of Sociology Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, 10, 68 Marines Str., Nikolaev, 54003, Ukraine, lvkalashnikova198@gmail.com

PhD in Sociological Science, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology

References

Spencer H. The evolution of society. Selection from Herbert Spencer's principles of sociology / Spencer H. / Ed. and with introd. L. Robert. Chicago, 1967.

Дюркгейм Э. Социология. Ее предмет, метод, предназначение / Э. Дюркгейм; [пер. с фр., составление, послесловие и примечания А.Б. Гофмана]. – М.: Канон, 1995. – 352 с.

Вебер М. Основные социологические понятия / Вебер М. // Западно-европейская социология ХIX-начала ХХ веков. – М., 1996. – С. 455-491.

Сорокин П. А. Человек. Цивилизация. Общество / Сорокин П. А. [общ. ред., сост. и предисл. А. Ю. Согомонов: пер. с англ]. – М.: Политиздат, 1992. – 543 с.

Wæver O. Towards a Political Sociology of Security Studies / Wæver O. // Security Dialogue. 2010. Vol. 41, № 6. – P. 649-658.

Brodie B. Ed., The Absolute Weapon. New York: Harcourt & Brace, 1946.

Brodie B. Strategy as a Science / Brodie B. // World Politics, 1949. – Vol. 4. № 1. – P. 467-488.

Kahn H. On Thermonuclear War / Kahn H. – Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961.

Kahn H. War Gaming, RAND Corporation paper / Kahn H., Mann I. – Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1957. – P-1167.

Schelling Th.C. An Essay on Bargaining / Schelling Th.C. // American Economic Review. 1956. Vol. 46. № 3. P. 281-306.

Schelling Th.C. The Strategy of Conflict: Prospectus for a Reorientation of Game Theory / Schelling Th.C. // Journal of Conflict Resolution.1958. Vol. 3. № 2. – P. 203-264.

Wohlstetter A. J. Selection and Use of Strategic Air Bases, RAND Corporation Report R-266 / Wohlstetter A. J., Hoffman R. J., Lutz, Rowen H.S. – Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1954.

Wolfers A. “National Security” as an Ambiguous Symbol / Wolfers A. // Political Science Quarterly, 1952. Vol. 67, No. 4 (Dec.). – P. 481-502.

Booth К. Security and Emancipation / Booth К. // Review of International Studies. 17 (4). – P. 313-326.

Jones R. Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory / Jones R. – Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1999.

Booth К. Theory of World Security / Booth К. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Booth К. Critical Security Studies and World Politics / Booth К. - Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2005.

Barkawi T. The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies / Barkawi T., Laffey M. // Review of International Studies. 32 (2006). – P. 329-352.

Buzan B. Security: a New Framework for Analysis / Buzan B., Wæver O., Wilde J. de. – Boulder, London, 1998.

Doty R. L. Immigration and the politics of security / Doty R. L. // Security Studies, vol. 8, № 2-3, 1998/1999.

Balzacq Th. Securitization Theory. How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve / Balzacq Th. – New York, 2011. – 272 p.

Бауман З. Текучая современность / Бауман З. [пер. с англ. / под ред. А.В. Асочакова]. – СПб., 2008. – 240 с.

Giddens A. Modernity and Self-identity, Stanford / Giddens A., 1991. – 264 p.

Dziebel G. On Anthony Giddens Concept of Ontological Security, the Problem oí Human Motivational Grounds and the Paradoxes of Consciousness / Dziebel G. – [Электронный ресурс. Режим доступа: http://www.kinshipstudies.org/MAsociology/CEU.OntologicalSecurityPaper.pdf.

Бек У. Общество риска на пути к другому модерну / Бек У. – М.: Прогресс-традиция, 2000. – 84 с.

Луман Н. Социальные системы. Очерк общей теории / Луман Н.: пер. с нем. – СПб.: Наука, 2007. – 648 с.

Луман Н. Понятие риска / Луман Н. // THESIS, 1994. – Вып. 5. – С. 135-160.

Штомпка П. Социология. Анализ современного общества / [пер. с пол. С.М. Червонной]. – М.: Логос, 2008. – 664 с.