Studying Integration Processes in Local Labor Communities: Between Interpersonal Communication and Social Structure (Based on the Theories by M. Granovetter, S. Eisenstadt, and A. Honneth)
Abstract
In the article, theoretical provisions by M. Granovetter, S. Eisenstadt, and A. Honneth regarding the interrelation between interpersonal relationships and social structure are analyzed. It is underlined that these provisions can be used for studying transformation processes in local labor communities under the conditions of capitalistic globalization and technological advancement since it is reasonable to suggest that in this situation such communities will gradually lose their integrative function. The selected approaches are reviewed in order to identify the elements of social relations, which they consider the most significant and the ways they connect these elements. Similarities and differences between the discussed theories are analyzed, as well as the possibilities of their integration into a single conceptual framework. A number of aspects of social relations that all the three researchers consider significant are outlined, which are the following: trust, involvement (or active recognition of the counterpart’s social significance), domination / submission relations and the establishment of compliance. The interconnection between these aspects is outlined also. It is concluded that the discussed theories can be integrated without contradictions into a single conceptual framework for studying social integration processes. Moreover, different scopes suggested by the researchers complement each other which allow elaborating a complex notion of these processes. The possibilities of application of such conceptual framework for studying integration processes in local labor communities are discussed. It is argued that it is adequate for studying social transformations resulting from the inconsistencies between physical and social topology. Perspectives of further research are outlined, including the effects of the above on solidarity in labor communities and their social and political agency, as well as the balance between intentionality and contingency in social change.
Downloads
References
Rifkin, J. (1995) The end of work: the decline of the global labor force and the dawn of the post-market era. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
Bauman, Z. (2001) ‘The rise and fall of labor’, The Individualized Society, p. 17-30.
Bauman, Z. (1998) Globalization: The Human Consequences. Columbia University Press.
Makeiev, S. (2021) ‘The varying modality of social self-positioning’ in Vorona, V., Shulga, M. (eds) The Ukrainian Society: monitoring of social change. 30 YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE. Issue 8 (22), Kyiv: Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine, pp. 201-218 [in Ukrainian]
Golikov, A. (2020). ‘The Problem of Theorizing On / Of Sociology and Problematization of Sociological Theory’, Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series “Sociological Studies of Contemporary Society: Methodology, Theory, Methods”, 45, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-6521-2020-45-01
Gamper, M. (2022) ‘Social Network Theories: An Overview’ in Klärner, A. et al. (eds.) Social Networks and Health Inequalities: A New Perspective for Research. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97722-1
Reis, J., Amorim, M., Melão, N., Cohen, Y., Rodrigues, M. (2020) ‘Digitalization: A Literature Review and Research Agenda’ in Anisic, Z., Lalic, B., Gracanin, D. (eds) Proceedings on 25th International Joint Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management – IJCIEOM. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43616-2_47
Grybauskas, A., Stefanini, A., Ghobakhloo, M. (2022) ‘Social sustainability in the age of digitalization: A systematic literature review on the social implications of Industry 4.0’, Technology in Society, 70, article 101997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101997
Tabarés, R., Bartolome Campino, T., García Valbuena, J. (2022) ‘Challenges and opportunities of maker culture for the digitalization of Spanish society’, Sociology and Technoscience, 12(2), 206-227. DOI 10.24197/st.2.2022.206-227
Kulueva, C., Ubaidullayev, M., Ismanaliev, K., Kuznetsov, V., Romanovskaya, E. (2020) ‘Digitalization of Kyrgyz Society: Challenges and Prospects’ in Popkova, E., Sergi, B. (eds) The 21st Century from the Positions of Modern Science: Intellectual, Digital and Innovative Aspects. ISC 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 91. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32015-7_26
Tombe, R., Smuts, H. (2023) ‘Society 5.0-Inspired Digitalization Framework for Resilient and Sustainable Agriculture’ in Gerber, A., Hinkelmann, K. (eds.), Society 5.0 2023 (EPiC Series in Computing, vol. 93, ISSN: 2398-7340), 216–227. Available at: https://www.easychair.org/publications/volume/Society_5.0_2023
Lindgren, I., Østergaard Madsen, C., Hofmann, S., Melin, U. (2019) ‘Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services’, Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), p. 427-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.002.
Ahel, O., Lingenau, K. (2020) ‘Opportunities and Challenges of Digitalization to Improve Access to Education for Sustainable Development in Higher Education’ in Leal Filho, W., et al. Universities as Living Labs for Sustainable Development, World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15604-6_21
Knudsen, D.-R. (2020) ‘Elusive boundaries, power relations, and knowledge production: A systematic review of the literature on digitalization in accounting’, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 36, article 100441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2019.100441
Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., Zepp Larson, B. (2020) ‘Work-from-Anywhere: The Productivity Effects of Geographic Flexibility’, Academy of Management Proceedings 2020(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2020.225
Chepurko, G. (2022) ‘Labor Market in Ukraine: Current Challenges and Risks’, Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, 2022(3), 121-148. [in Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2022.03.121
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Eisenstadt, S. N., Roniger, L. (1984) Patrons, Clients and Friends: Interpersonal Relations and the Structure of Trust in Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Honneth, A. (1996) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Krippner, G., Granovetter, M. et al. (2004) ‘Polanyi Symposium: a conversation on embeddedness’, Socio-Economic Review, 2, 109-135.
Granovetter, M. (1978) ‘Threshold Models of Collective Behavior’, The American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420-1443.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1973) Tradition, Change and Modernity. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1978) Revolution and Transformation of Societies: A Comparative Study of Civilizations. New York: Free Press.
Honneth, A. (2004) ‘Recognition and Justice: Outline of a Plural Theory of Justice’, Acta Sociologica, 47 (4) "Recognition, Redistribution, and Justice", 351-364.
Honneth, A. (1992) ‘Moral Development and Social Struggle: Hegel’s Early Social-Philosophical Doctrines’ in Honneth, A., McCarthy, T., Offe, C., Wellmer, A. (eds) Cultural-Political Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London: The MIT Press.
Honneth, A. (2012) The I in We: Studies in the Theory of Recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
