Discursive construction of semiotic models of intercultural communication in terms of borderlands studies: a theoretical conceptualization
Abstract
The article deals with the semiotic communication models in terms of an substantial scientific basis of sociological analysis of adolescent’s intercultural interaction at the borderlands area. The structure and features of verbal aspects of communicative interaction are revealed. Some communication models are emphasized taking into account the fact that they provide the greatest epistemological potential to explain the interaction of different types of cultures in modern social and cultural circumstances. The dynamics of the construction of semiotic communication models and their theoretical conceptualization have been investigated, in particular, the models of K. Biuller, R. Yakobson, Y. Lotman, S. Paulsen, U. Eko are revealed. The possibilities and limitations of above mentioned models use within the studies of intercultural communication, in particular the epistemological ability of each one models to explain the practices of intercultural interaction of youth groups at the borderlands, are investigated. It is emphasized that K. Biuller's model has the epistemological potential of explaining the processes of intercultural communication at the microlevel and partly at the, mesolevel of social structure, while R. Yakobson's model best reveals the linguistic aspects of intercultural dialogue and understanding. The conceptual vision of the semiotics of intercultural interaction, presented in Y. Lotman's model, is also of special interest in the context of explaining linguistic aspects, but, in our opinion, it practically does not reveal the sociocultural aspects of intercultural communication. It is emphasized that U. Eko's semiotic model of communication has perhaps the most powerful heuristic potential for analyzing the issues chosen by the author (the studies of intercultural interaction of young people at the borderlands), as it reveals the mechanisms of production and dissemination of untruths in communication processes as a component of the communication model, reveals the dimensions of the transformation of the content of the message in the process of its translation from sender to receiver. It is concluded that certain elements of all analyzed models can be epistemologically useful tools for analyzing the processes of intercultural communication of young people at the borderlands, however in terms of the epistemological use the most optimal are semiotic model of communication U. Eko and some statements of R. Yakobson's theory.
Downloads
References
/References
Почепцов Г. Г. Теория коммуникации. М.: «Рефл-бук», К.: «Ваклер», 2001. 656 с.
Максимович О. В. Соціологічні та психологічні моделі комунікації: можливості та обмеження застосування в дослідженнях міжкультурної взаємодії в умовах прикордоння. Український соціум. №1 (72). 2020. С. 62-82.
Якобсон Р. Лингвистика и поэтика. Структурализм: «за» и «против»: сборник статей. Перевод с английского, французского, немецкого, чешского, польского и болгарского языков / под редакцией Е. Я. Басина и М. Я. Полякова. М.: «Прогресс», 1975. С. 193-231.
Бюлер К. Теория языка. Репрезентативная функция языка. М.: Прогресс, 1993. 502 c.
Kohler K. Speech Communication in Human Interaction. Communicative Functions and Linguistic Forms in Speech Interaction Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316756782.003 (Citation date: 15.03.2020).
Poulsen S. Collocations as a Language Resource. A Functional and Cognitive Study in English Phraseology: Ph.d. dissertation Institute of Language and Communication University of Southern Denmark, 2005. 298 р. URL: https://cutt.ly/jtgMOSB (Citation date: 15.03.2020)
Sinha Ch. Cognitive Linguistics, Psychology and Cognitive Science. Draft Chapter for D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (Eds.) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Draft 1, 2001 URL: https://cutt.ly/Ftg1VFg (Citation date: 15.03.2020).
Jakobson R. Linguistics and Poetics. URL: https://cutt.ly/Ytg15H8 (Citation date: 15.03.2020).
Malinowski В. The Meaning of Meaning. The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages / C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards, eds. New York and London, 9th ed., 1953. Р. 296-336. URL: https://cutt.ly/Mtg0WRJ (Citation date: 15.03.2020).
Лотман Ю. Культура и взрыв. М.: Гнозис; Издательская группа «Прогресс», 1992. 272 с.
Лотман Ю.М. Внутри мыслящих миров. Человек – текст – семиосфера – история. М.: Языки русской культуры, 1996. 464 с.
Соболев Д. Лотман и структурализм: опыт невозвращения. Вопросы литературы. 2008. N 3. С. 5-51.
Умберто Эко. Отсутствующа структура. Введени в семиологию / пер. с итал. В. Г. Резни и А. Г. Погоняйло. СПб.: «Симпозиум», 2006. 544 с.
Pocheptsov, G., (2001). Communication Theory. Moscow: «Refl-book», Kiev: «Vakler» [in Russian]
Maksymovych, O. V. (2020) Sociological and psychological models of communication: possibilities and restrictions of application in intercultural interaction research at the borderlands Ukrainian Society №1 (72), pp. 62-82 https://doi.org/10.15407/socium2020.01.062 [in Ukrainian]
Jakobson, R. (1975). Linguistics and Poetics. In: E. Y. Basina and M. Y. Polyakova, editors. Structuralism: «for» and «against»: A Collection of Articles. Translated from English, French, German, Czech, Polish and Bulgarian. Moscow: «Progress», pp.193-231 [in Russian]
Biuller, K. (1993). Theory of Language. Representative Function of Language. Moscow: «Progress» [in Russian]
Kohler, K. (2017). Speech Communication in Human Interaction. Communicative Functions and Linguistic Forms in Speech Interaction p.1-17 [online]. Available at: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316756782.003 (Viewed 15 March 2020)
Poulsen, S. (2005). Collocations as a Language Resource. A Functional and Cognitive Study in English Phraseology. Ph.D. thesis, Institute of Language and Communication University of Southern Denmark [online]. Available at: https://cutt.ly/jtgMOSB (Viewed15 March 2020)
Sinha, Ch. (2001) Cognitive Linguistics, Psychology and Cognitive Science. In: D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens, eds. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics [online]. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Cognitive-Linguistics%2C-Psychology%2C-and-Cognitive-Sinha/1ca82146eccd7dd20a8ed1171b0015cfdf2068f9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb%2F9780199738632.013.0049
Jakobson, R. (n. d.) Linguistics and Poetics [online]. Available at: https://cutt.ly/Ytg15H8 (Viewed15 March 2020)
Malinowski, В., (1953) The Meaning of Meaning. In: C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards, eds. The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages. New York and London. pp. 296-336 Available at: https://cutt.ly/Mtg0WRJ
Lotman, Y. (1992) Culture and explosion. Moscow: Gnosis; Progress Publishing Group [in Russian]
Lotman, Y. (1996) Inside the Thinking Worlds. Man – Text - Semiosphere – History. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture [in Russian]
Sobolev, D. (2008) Lotman and Structuralism: the Experience of Non-return. Questions of Literature (3) pp. 5-51 [in Russian]
Eko, Umberto (2006). Missing Structure. Introduction to Semiology. Translated from Italian by V. G. Rezny and A. G. Pogonyailo. St. Petersburg: «Symposium» [in Russian]