New Media and the Publicness: Classical Approaches and Sociocultural Reflection
Keywords:
new media, social media, publicity, the public, public sphere, e-public
Abstract
The paper presents the sociological analysis of structural changes of the nowadays publicity. The criteria of the "newness" of publicity which is mediated through electronic communication technologies are problematized. The traditional opposition between "real" and "virtual" publicity that characterizes classical approaches in the media studies and the public sphere studies is challenged. It is considered a character of a new sociality found by the French sociologist M. Maffesoli in the solidarity of postmodern tribes. The humanistic potential and abilities provided by new media in the frame of establishing the Internet-public are articulated.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Арендт Х. VITA ACTIVA, Или о деятельной жизни [Электронный ресурс] / Ханна Арендт. - СПб, 2000. - Режим доступу до глави книги: http://onrevolution.narod.ru/arendt/vita_activa2.htm
2. Сойя Э. Как писать о городе с точки зрения пространства / Э. Сойя // Логос - №3(66), 2008. – С. 130-140.
3. Флорида Р. Креативный класс. Люди, которые меняют будущее/ Ричард Флорида, - Классика-XXI, 2007. – 280 с.
4. Эко У. Полный назад! "Горячие войны" и популизм в СМИ / Умберто Эко, – М : Эксмо, 2007. – 450 с.
5. Benhabib, S 1992, ‘Models of Public Sphere: Hanna Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jürgen Habermas’, in C Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, The MIT Press, Massachusetts, and London, England, pp. 73-99.
6. Davis M. 1995, ‘Fortress Loss Angeles: The Militarization of Urban Space’, Metropolis. Center and Symbol of Our Times, Edited by Ph.Kasinitz, New York University press, – pp. 355-369.
7. Dijk, van J 2001, The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media, Sage Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.
8. Flew, T 2005, New Media: an Introduction, Oxford University Press, New York.
9. Frazer, N 1992, ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere’, in C Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, The MIT Press, Massachusetts, and London, England, pp. 109-143.
10. Habermas, J 1986, Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, MIT Press, Canbridge, Massachusetts.
11. Habermas, J 1994, ‘Further Reflections on the Public Sphere’ in CJ Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the public sphere, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, pp. 421-466.
12. Harvey D. 1993, Social justice and a city, John Hopkins University press, Baltimore, p. 350.
13. Henaff, M & Strong, TB 2001, ‘Public Space, Virtual Space, and Democracy’, M Henaff & TB Strong (ed.), Public Space and Democracy, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, London, pp. 221-231.
14. Holt, R 2004, Dialogue on the Internet: Language, Civic Identity, and Computer-Mediated Communication, Westport, Connecticut, London.
15. Holub C. Robert, 1991 Jürgen Habermas. Critic in the Public Sphere, Routledge, London.
16. Jacobs, J 1980, The death and life of great American Cities, Rengiun Books, p. 350.
17. Kaufmann, F-X 1998, ‘New Social Movements as Catalysts for Normative Conflicts?’, in PL Berger (ed.), The Limits of Social Cohesion: Conflicts and Mediation in Pluralist Societies, Westview Press, USA, pp. 98-105.
18. Krajewski M. Od muzeum publicznego do muzeum publiczności, w: J.Lubiak (red.), Muzeum jako świetlany przedmiot pożądania // Muzeum Sztuki, Łódź. 2007. – Р.51-64.
19. Maffesoli, M 1996, The Time of the Tribes. The Decline of Individualism in the Mass Society, SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.
20. Mitchell, WJ 2000, E-topia: "Urban life, Jim-But not as We know It", The MIT Press, Cambridge, London, England.
21. Page, BI 1996, Who deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London
22. Postman, N 1985, Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England.
23. Schudson, M 1992, ‘Was There Ever a Public Sphere?’, in C Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, The MIT Press, Massachusetts, and London, England, pp. 143-164
24. Scott, A 1990, Ideology and the new social movements, Routledge, London and New York
25. Walzer, M 1995, ‘Pleasures and Costs of Urbanity’, in Ph Kasinitz (ed.), Metropolis. Center and Symbol of Our Times, New York University press, pp. 320-331.
26. Touraine, A 1997, What is Democracy?, Westview Press. A division of Harper Collins Publishers, Oxford.
27. Young, IM 1995, ‘City Life and Difference’, Metropolis. Center and Symbol of Our Times. Edited by Ph.Kasinitz, New York University press, pp. 250-270.
28. Zald, MN & McCarthy JD 1986, Social Movements in an Organizational Society, New Brunswick (USA) and Oxford (UK).
2. Сойя Э. Как писать о городе с точки зрения пространства / Э. Сойя // Логос - №3(66), 2008. – С. 130-140.
3. Флорида Р. Креативный класс. Люди, которые меняют будущее/ Ричард Флорида, - Классика-XXI, 2007. – 280 с.
4. Эко У. Полный назад! "Горячие войны" и популизм в СМИ / Умберто Эко, – М : Эксмо, 2007. – 450 с.
5. Benhabib, S 1992, ‘Models of Public Sphere: Hanna Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jürgen Habermas’, in C Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, The MIT Press, Massachusetts, and London, England, pp. 73-99.
6. Davis M. 1995, ‘Fortress Loss Angeles: The Militarization of Urban Space’, Metropolis. Center and Symbol of Our Times, Edited by Ph.Kasinitz, New York University press, – pp. 355-369.
7. Dijk, van J 2001, The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media, Sage Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.
8. Flew, T 2005, New Media: an Introduction, Oxford University Press, New York.
9. Frazer, N 1992, ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere’, in C Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, The MIT Press, Massachusetts, and London, England, pp. 109-143.
10. Habermas, J 1986, Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, MIT Press, Canbridge, Massachusetts.
11. Habermas, J 1994, ‘Further Reflections on the Public Sphere’ in CJ Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the public sphere, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, pp. 421-466.
12. Harvey D. 1993, Social justice and a city, John Hopkins University press, Baltimore, p. 350.
13. Henaff, M & Strong, TB 2001, ‘Public Space, Virtual Space, and Democracy’, M Henaff & TB Strong (ed.), Public Space and Democracy, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, London, pp. 221-231.
14. Holt, R 2004, Dialogue on the Internet: Language, Civic Identity, and Computer-Mediated Communication, Westport, Connecticut, London.
15. Holub C. Robert, 1991 Jürgen Habermas. Critic in the Public Sphere, Routledge, London.
16. Jacobs, J 1980, The death and life of great American Cities, Rengiun Books, p. 350.
17. Kaufmann, F-X 1998, ‘New Social Movements as Catalysts for Normative Conflicts?’, in PL Berger (ed.), The Limits of Social Cohesion: Conflicts and Mediation in Pluralist Societies, Westview Press, USA, pp. 98-105.
18. Krajewski M. Od muzeum publicznego do muzeum publiczności, w: J.Lubiak (red.), Muzeum jako świetlany przedmiot pożądania // Muzeum Sztuki, Łódź. 2007. – Р.51-64.
19. Maffesoli, M 1996, The Time of the Tribes. The Decline of Individualism in the Mass Society, SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.
20. Mitchell, WJ 2000, E-topia: "Urban life, Jim-But not as We know It", The MIT Press, Cambridge, London, England.
21. Page, BI 1996, Who deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London
22. Postman, N 1985, Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England.
23. Schudson, M 1992, ‘Was There Ever a Public Sphere?’, in C Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, The MIT Press, Massachusetts, and London, England, pp. 143-164
24. Scott, A 1990, Ideology and the new social movements, Routledge, London and New York
25. Walzer, M 1995, ‘Pleasures and Costs of Urbanity’, in Ph Kasinitz (ed.), Metropolis. Center and Symbol of Our Times, New York University press, pp. 320-331.
26. Touraine, A 1997, What is Democracy?, Westview Press. A division of Harper Collins Publishers, Oxford.
27. Young, IM 1995, ‘City Life and Difference’, Metropolis. Center and Symbol of Our Times. Edited by Ph.Kasinitz, New York University press, pp. 250-270.
28. Zald, MN & McCarthy JD 1986, Social Movements in an Organizational Society, New Brunswick (USA) and Oxford (UK).
Published
2019-08-28
How to Cite
Zayec, D. (2019). New Media and the Publicness: Classical Approaches and Sociocultural Reflection. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Sociological Studies of Contemporary Society: Methodology, Theory, methods", (993), 48-52. Retrieved from https://periodicals.karazin.ua/ssms/article/view/14054
Issue
Section
Theoretical and Methodological Problems of Sociology
