METAPHYSICITY OF EVIL

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2019-61-10

Keywords:

good, evil, spiritual knowledge, simulacrum, distortion, co-being

Abstract

In this article, the author explores the metaphysical foundations of evil. Research shows that as a transcendental phenomenon, evil reveals itself in two “optics”. On the one hand, evil means certain ontological aspects, which are distortions of the mode of co-existence. On the other hand, evil is a deformation of the existential nature of man. Thus, evil is a condition for the deformation of the ontological foundations of being, penetrating the world through human. In other words, the metaphysical nature of evil appears as, firstly, “absence”, “void” (in being), and, secondly, “distortion”, “imperfection”. In this regard, evil appears as ontologically and chronologically secondary to good. It exists only on the basis of good as its distortion, defect, simulacrum. The emptiness, unreality of evil opens the sphere of its existence, that is, an illusion. This explains the fact that evil receives its “reality”, materiality and form only with the help of a person who is free in his choice and able to distort the nature of good and realize illusion. Good is knowledge, it can transform a person, it is a living spiritual knowledge that opens itself to a knowing person in the process of mastering the surrounding reality, it fills him / her with content and uniqueness. In this perspective, good is a universal value system, the basis of which is love, truth, faith, labor, spiritual perfection, etc. In contrast, evil realizes itself in the denial of higher values, distortion or inappropriate use of the Truth of human existence. The study shows that the nature of evil is selfish, atomic and separating. Evil is all that contradicts the interests of the whole, that is, love, good, truth, freedom. It is all that individualizes, fragmentes, distorts, destroys the Truth of the whole. Thus, the basic principle of evil is “It’s every man for himself, everyone is his own god”. Therefore, as noted by religious philosophers, evil in human is associated primarily with the loss of his / her integrity. A person who has embarked on the path of violence and self-destruction is evil. This person is mistaken and unhappy, because he has not formed as a person. Goodness in human is internal integrity, unity, submission of his / her mind and bodily life to a higher spiritual principles.

Author Biography

  • Yuliia Yu. Brodetska, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University; 72, Gagarin Avenue, 49010, Dnіpro, Ukraine

    D.Sc. in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy

References

Berdyaev, N. (1931). About the Appointment of the Person. Paris: Modern Notes. (In Russian).

Berdyaev, N. (1994). The Philosophy of Free Spirit. Мoscow: Republic. (In Russian).

The Bible or the Books of Scripture Old and New Testament. (2002). (I. Ogienko, Trans.). Kyiv: Ukrainian Bible Society. Retrieved from https://bibleonline.ru/bible/ubio. (In Ukrainian).

Bulgakov, S. (1994). Non-evening Light. Contemplation and Peculation. Мoscow: Republic. (In Russian).

Dionysius the Areopagite. (2006). Corpus of Works. (G. Prokhorov, Trans.). Saint Petersburg: Oleg

Abyshko Publishing House. (In Russian).

Ilyin, I. (1993). On Resisting Evil by Force. In I. Ilyin, Path to the Evidence (рр. 6–134). Мoscow: Republic.(In Russian).

Karsavin, L. (1994). About Good and Evil. In L. Karsavin, Small Works (pp. 250–284). Saint Petersburg: Aleteia. (In Russian).

Lossky, N. (1991) Conditions of Absolute Good: The fundamentals of ethics; Character of the Russian people. Мoscow. (In Russian)

Lossky, N. (1995). Sensual, Intellectual and Mystical Intuition. Мoscow: Republic. (In Russian).

Leibniz, G.W. (1989). Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man. In G.W. Leibniz, Collected Works in 4 Volumes (Vol. 4, pp. 49–554). Мoscow: Mysl. (In Russian).

Filaret (Vakhromieiev), Metropolitan of Minsk and Slutsk. (2006). Problem of Evil in Orthodox Theology. In V. K. Shokhin (Ed.), The Problem of Evil and Theodicy: (Мoscow, June 6–9, 2005). Intern. Conference Proceedings (pp. 16–21). (In Russian).

Moiseenko, М. (2003). Philosophy of Culture by Ivan Ilyin. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: “Philosophy”, 1, 76–82. (In Russian).

Osipov, O. (2019). Understanding of Evil. Retrieved from https://azbyka.ru/ponimanie-zla. (In Russian).

Solovyov, V. (1994). Reading about God-manhood. Saint Petersburg: Belles-lettres. (In Russian).

Augustinus. (1955). De Civitate Dei. (B. Dombard & A. Kalb, Eds.). Turnholti: Typographi Brepols. (In Latin).

Krąpiec, M. (1995). Metafizyka. Lublin: RW-KUL. (In Polish).

Kowalczyk, S. (1980). Podstawy Światopoglądu Chrześcijańskiego. Warszawa: ODISS. (In Polish).

Tomasz z Akwinu. (1962–1986). Suma Teologiczna. Londyn: Veritas. (In Polish).

Lévi-Strauss, Cl. (1987). Introduction to the Work of Marcel Mauss. (F. Baker, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1950).

Stróżewski, W. (1981). Istnienie i Wartość. Kraków: Znak. (In Polish).

Wojtysiak, J. ( 2007). Filozofia i Życie. Kraków: Znak. (In Polish).

Published

2019-12-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

METAPHYSICITY OF EVIL. (2019). The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, 61, 91-98. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2019-61-10

Most read articles by the same author(s)