TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL MODEL OF HUMANITY IN THE DIGITAL SPACE
Abstract
The article considers the problem of human anthropological limits in the context of the development of high technologies and digital reality. The phenomenon of Homo virtual is analyzed as a new model of human subjectivity, which is formed at the intersection of biological, technological and virtual environments. The space environment is significantly different from the conditions of the Earth; microgravity, cosmic radiation and isolation affect the physiological state of human. The spectrum of possibilities for adapting the human organism to outer space is clarified, from biotechnological modifications and the use of artificial intelligence to support life to the creation of closed biospheres and cosmic corporeality, which becomes a new form of anthropological adaptation. The philosophical and social challenges associated with the modification of the human body, the use of artificial intelligence and the adaptation of human to the virtual environment are investigated. Convergent NBIC technologies manifest the entire spectrum of development of modern science, where all components are interdependent and give a general cumulative effect aimed at expanding the anthropological limits of human and forming human-sized environments. In this context, human transformations have now expanded enormously thanks to plastic surgery and transplantations. Urbanized technogenic civilization leads to the removal of restrictions on the existence of human corporeality and the expansion of the possibilities of genetic engineering in matters of fertility, increasing life expectancy, cloning, etc. and mediates a different moral, legal and religious nature of human existence. The significance of bioethical aspects of the transformation of human corporeality in the digital and technological space is substantiated. Bioethics in this context is called upon to form the principles of responsible use of technologies and determine the moral limits of their application. It is shown that the anthropological limits of human are not static, throughout history they have changed along with the development of culture, science and technology, but in the era of high technology they have become even more dynamic, and there has been a threat of their negative impact on human existence as a whole.
Downloads
References
Beilin, M.V., Zheltoborodov, O.M. (2022). Human in the conditions of cognitive-technological anthroposphere. Actual Problems in Philosophy and Sociology, (39), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.32782/apfs.v039.2022.1. (In Ukrainian)
Beilin, M.V. (2015). Nanotechnologies in the context of post-nonclassical science: formation of philosophical foundations: dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Kharkiv. (In Ukrainian)
Gazniuk, L., Beilin, M. (2020). Transformation of desire in a “post-consumption” society. Bulletin of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series “Philosophy. Philosophical Peripetias”, (63), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2020-63-7. (In Ukrainian)
Krymsky, S. B. (2010). On Sophianism, Truth, and the Meanings of Human Being. Kyiv: G. S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. (In Ukrainian)
Beilin, M., Soina, I., Horbenko, O., Zheltoborodov, O. (2023). Ontology of Natural Landscapes and Human Global Environmental Consciousness. Dialogue and Universalism, 33 (2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.5840/du202333215.
Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York : Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Habermas, J. (2001). Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? Frankfurt am Main : Suhrkamp.
Industrial Policy for the Intelligence Age: Ideas to Keep People First. (2026). OpenAI, April 2026. https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/561e7512-253e-424b-9734-ef4098440601/Industrial%20Policy%20for%20the%20Intelligence%20Age.pdf.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception / translated by D. A. Landes. London : Routledge.
Morin, E. (1990). Introduction à la pensée complexe. Paris : Éditions du Seuil.
Morin, E., Kern, A.-B. (1993). Terre-Patrie. Paris : Éditions du Seuil.
Žižek, S. (2020). Hegel in a Wired Brain. London : Bloomsbury Academic.
Žižek, S. (2003). The Puppet and the Dwarf: The Perverse Core of Christianity. Cambridge, Massachusetts : MIT Press
Copyright (c) 2026 Михайло Бейлін, Олександр Желтобородов

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


3.gif)



