FEATURES OF PROTEIN STRUCTURE AND THE IMMUNOGENICITY OF ACTUAL INFLUENZA VACCINES

  • A. Yu. Volyanskiy
  • E. A. Romanova
  • T. A. Sydorenko
  • N. I. Igumnova
  • V. I. Yuchimenko
  • N. V. Kashpur
  • A. V. Martynov
Keywords: vaccines against a virus of influenza, immunogenicity, albuminous composition

Abstract

Immunogenicity and the basic characteristics of albuminous components of new vaccines against a virus of influenza A (H1N1) by Panenza and MonoGrippol were investigated. The quantitative and qualitative structure of proteins of both vaccines is revealed: five – the split vaccine of Panenza, two – subisolated vaccines of MonoGrippol. It was established that the immunogenicity of investigated subisolated adjuvant vaccine twice exceeds an immunogenicity of viral-split nonadjuvant vaccine.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Лавров В. Ф. Основы иммунологии, эпидемиологии и профилактики инфекционных болезней / В. Ф. Лавров, Е. В. Русакова, А. А. Шапошников [и др.] – М. : ЗАО «МП Гигиена», 2007. – 311 с.

2. Chaloupka I. Comparative analisis of six European influenza vaccines / I. Chaloupka, A. Schuler, M. Marschall, H. Meier-Ewert // Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. – 1996. – V. 15. – P. 121–127.

3. Бектимиров Т. А. Методы определения показателей качества иммунобиологических препаратов для профилактики и диагностики гриппа : Методические указания / Т. А. Бектимиров, Н. И. Лонская, Н. А. Агафонова [и др.] – М. : Федеральный центр Госсанэпиднадзора Минздрава России, 2003. – 32 с.

4. Xie H. Evaluating the vaccine potential of an influenza A viral hemagglutinin and matrix double insertion DNA plasmid / H. Xie, T. Liu, H. Chen [et al.] // Vaccine. – 2007. – V. 25, № 44. – P. 7649–7655.

5. Караулов А. В. Инфекции и иммунодефициты – приоритеты сегодня / А. В. Караулов // Практикующий врач. – 1997. – № 9. – С. 3–4.

6. Kunzel W. Kinetics of humoral antibody response to trivalent inactivated split influenza vaccine in subjects previously vaccinated or vaccinated for the first time / W. Kunzel, H.Glathe, H. Engelman, Ch. Van Hoecke // Vaccine. – 1996. – V. 14, № 12. – P. 1108–1110.

7. Laddy D. J. Immunogenicity of novel consensus-based DNA vaccines against avian influenza / D. J. Laddy, J. Yan, N. Corbitt [et al.] // Vaccine. – 2007. – V. 25, № 16. – P. 2984–2989.

8. Grebe K. M. Heterosubtypic immunity to influenza A virus: where do we stand? / K. M. Grebe, J. W. Yewdell, J. R. Bennink // Microbes and Infection. – 2008. – V. 10, № 9. – P. 1024–1029.

9. Ochiai H. Inactivated influenza vaccine effectiveness against influenza-like illness among young children in Japan – With special reference to minimizing outcome misclassification / H. Ochiai, M. Fujieda, S. Ohfuji [et al.] // Vaccine. – 2009. – V. 27, № 50. – P. 7031–7035.

10. Beran J. Evaluation of reactogenicity and immunogenicity of two influenza vaccines (vaxigrip and fluarix) in the season 1996–1997 / J. Beran, R. Prymula, R. Chilber [et al.] // Cent. Eur. J. Public Health. – 1998. – № 64. – P. 269–273.
How to Cite
Volyanskiy, A. Y., Romanova, E. A., Sydorenko, T. A., Igumnova, N. I., Yuchimenko, V. I., Kashpur, N. V., & Martynov, A. V. (1). FEATURES OF PROTEIN STRUCTURE AND THE IMMUNOGENICITY OF ACTUAL INFLUENZA VACCINES. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series "Medicine", (21), 5-9. Retrieved from https://periodicals.karazin.ua/medicine/article/view/6886
Section
Fundamental research