International security in international relations theory: levels of analysis and explanatory frameworks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26565/2310-9513-2025-22-03Keywords:
international security, International Relations theory, levels of analysis, explanatory frameworks, realism, liberalism, constructivismAbstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of international security within contemporary International Relations theory, with a particular focus on levels of analysis and explanatory frameworks. The relevance of the topic is determined by the transformation of the global security environment in the early twenty-first century, manifested in the hybridization of armed and non-armed conflicts, the increasing role of non-state actors, the spread of cyber and information threats, and the growing technological dimension of security. Under these conditions, traditional military-centred approaches that long dominated International Relations theory appear limited in their capacity to explain current security processes. The subject of the study is theoretical approaches to the analysis of international security within the main paradigms of International Relations theory, namely realism, liberalism, and constructivism, as well as their corresponding analytical levels and explanatory frameworks. The aim of the article is to systematize theoretical approaches and levels of analysis of international security in order to establish a coherent methodological basis for examining contemporary security challenges. The objectives of the study include clarifying the conceptual boundaries of international security within International Relations theory, identifying the analytical potential of individual, state, and systemic levels of analysis, and conducting a comparative assessment of the explanatory capacity of the main theoretical paradigms. The methodological framework of the research is based on general scientific and specialized methods, including system analysis to identify interconnections between different dimensions of security, comparative analysis to contrast theoretical interpretations, structural-functional analysis to examine the role of institutional factors, and conceptual generalization. The results of the study demonstrate that no single theoretical approach provides a comprehensive explanation of contemporary international threats, while effective analysis of international security requires the integration of individual, state, and systemic levels of analysis. It is shown that the interaction of structural conditions of the international system, institutional regulatory mechanisms, and ideational factors related to identities and political discourses forms a coherent analytical model for the study of security processes. The conclusions indicate that the integration of analytical levels and explanatory frameworks ensures a holistic theoretical understanding of international security and enhances the analytical capacity for examining contemporary security dynamics within the international system.
References
Bisaha, Yu. M., Deshko, L. M., & Nechyporuk, H. Yu. (2020). Mizhnarodna bezpeka, natsionalna bezpeka, konstytutsiina bezpeka: teoretyko-pravovi pidkhody. [International security, national security, constitutional security: theoretical and legal approaches]. Porivnialno-analitychne pravo, (4), 43–49. (in Ukrainian)
Buriachenko, O. V. (2024). Bezpekovi vyklyky heopolityky XXI stolittia: vektory ta priorytety polityky bezpeky. [Security challenges of geopolitics of the 21st century: vectors and priorities of security policy]. Politykus, (3), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-9616.2024-3.24 (in Ukrainian)
Veremtii, Ye. O. (2025). Mizhnarodna systema yak instrument protydii etnopolitychnii destabilizatsii: sytuatyvna kryza chy permanentna neefektyvnist instytutiv. [The international system as a tool for countering ethnopolitical destabilization: a situational crisis or permanent ineffectiveness of institutions]. Aktualni problemy polityky, 75, 212–219. https://doi.org/10.32782/app.v75.2025.29 (in Ukrainian)
Dzoban, O. P., & Sosnin, O. V. (2021). Kontseptualni pidkhody do rozuminnia sutnosti y zabezpechennia natsionalnoi bezpeky u suchasnii nautsi. [Conceptual approaches to understanding the essence and ensuring national security in modern science]. In O. P. Dzoban (Ed.), Natsionalna bezpeka: svitohliadni ta teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady (pp. 75–104). Kharkiv: Pravo. (in Ukrainian)
Kazakova, L. O. (2021). Natsionalna bezpeka derzhavy: poniatiino-katehoriinyi aparat. [National security of the state: conceptual and categorical apparatus]. Rehionalni studii, (24), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6170/2021.24.18 (in Ukrainian)
Sytnyk, H. P., Nelipa, D. V., & Orel, M. H. (2021). Zovnishnia polityka ta natsionalna bezpeka. [Foreign Policy and National Security: Textbook. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Vydavets Kravchenko Ya. O. (in Ukrainian)
Bezpartochnyi, M., Khaustova, V., & Trushkina, N. (2023). Mechanism for ensuring international security in new geostrategic realities. In Prospects for sustainable development and ensuring the security of economic systems in the new geostrategic realities (pp. 222–246). Košice: Vysoká škola bezpečnostného manažérstva v Košiciach. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10436679
Booth, K. (2007). Theory of world security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B. (2024). The future of international security in the post-Western world order. International Relations, 38(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178231219450
Floyd, R. (2024). Security and the environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009468947
Thies, C. G. (Ed.). (2025). Handbook of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levy, J. S. (2008). Levels of analysis and causes of war. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international relations (pp. 129–146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172.
Singer, J. D. (1961). The level-of-analysis problem in international relations. World Politics, 14(1), 77–92.
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. (2024). SIPRI Yearbook 2024: Armaments, disarmament and international security. Stockholm: SIPRI. Available at: https://www.sipri.org/yearbook/2024
Uppsala Conflict Data Program. (2025). UCDP conflict encyclopedia. Uppsala University Available at: https://ucdp.uu.se
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors submitting publications for this edition agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain the copyright to their publications and grant the journal “The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: International Relations. Economics. Country Studies. Tourism” for the right of first publication.
- Submission and acceptance of a publication to the journal means that the authors grant the journal a non-exclusive license to publish, distribute, and archive the material in print and electronic form and to include it in international abstracting and bibliographic databases.
- Authors may:
- deposit the published version of their work in institutional or disciplinary repositories,
- distribute it on personal or professional web pages,
- use the material for educational or research purposes,
provided that:
- the publication is not altered,
- it is not used for commercial purposes,
- a complete bibliographic reference for the publication in the journal is provided.
Authors' Responsibility
- The authors guarantee that the submitted publication is an original work and does not infringe on the copyrights or intellectual property of third parties.
- The authors confirm that this manuscript has not been published previously and is not under consideration by another publisher.
- If the publication uses materials (figures, tables, data, etc.) belonging to third parties, the authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions and for correctly citing the sources.
Publisher's Responsibility
- This publication ensures a transparent and ethical publication process, as well as open access to all materials in accordance with the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.
- The publication guarantees long-term digital preservation of content by archiving it in internal and external repositories.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
