The Enhancing the Yield of Carbon Nanotubes Through the Nanocatalyst-Substrate Interface
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2026-1-28Keywords:
Carbon nanotubes, NiO catalyst, Sol-gel method, CVD, Substrate–nanocatalyst interface, RBM, YieldAbstract
In this study, the effect of the nanocatalyst/substrate interface on the yield and quality of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) synthesized by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) was investigated. Nickel oxide (NiO) nanoparticles were prepared using the sol–gel spin-coating method and deposited as thin films with different masses (66 mg, 99 mg, and 132 mg) on SiO2/Si substrates with an identical surface area of 12,56 cm2. The NiO nanoparticle thin films on the substrate surface were then placed into a CVD reactor and reduced in a hydrogen atmosphere, resulting in the formation of nickel nanoparticles that acted as active catalysts during CNTs synthesis. Ethanol vapor was used as the sole carbon source without any carrier gas, which enabled precise and comparative evaluation of the CNTs yield. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy were employed to characterize the obtained CNTs. XRD results showed that CNTs with high crystallinity were produced when a 51,7 mg catalyst thin film was used. Raman spectroscopy confirmed the presence of RBM, G, D, and G′ peaks characteristic of CNTs structures. Increasing the catalyst mass led to a rise in RBM frequency and a decrease in CNTs diameter. However, an increase in catalyst mass also caused a reduction in CNTs yield. The highest yield (445%) was observed for Ni nanocatalysts with a mass of 51,7 mg. These findings demonstrate that the thickness of the catalyst layer and its surface distribution density on the substrate play a crucial role in determining the growth efficiency and structural quality of CNTs.
References
M. Diarra, et al., Physical Review Letters, 109(18), 185501 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.185501
B. Karakashov, M. Mayne-L’Hermite, and M. Pinault, Nanomaterials, 12(13), 2300 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12132300
X. Zhao, et al., Accounts of chemical research, 55(23), 3334 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00592
D. Hedman, et al., Nature Communications, 15(1), 4076 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47999-7
K. Awasthi, A. Srivastava, and O. N. Srivastava, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology, 5(10), 1616-1636 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2005.407
E.R. Meshot, et al., Acs Nano, 3(9), 2477 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn900446a
L. Nánai, et al., Scientific Reports, 14(1), 7307 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57862-w
J. Bora, et al., Applied Surface Science, 648, 158988 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158988
J. Sengupta, and C. M. Hussain, Biosensors, 15(5), 296 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15050296
S. Zecchi, et al., Micromachines, 16(1), 53 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16010053
K.J. Hughes, et al., ACS Applied Nano Materials, 7(16), 18695 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.4c02721
A. Venkataraman, et al., Nanoscale research letters, 14(1), 220 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-019-3046-3
Y. Hoshino, et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 282, 125 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2011.08.062
X. Li, et al., Scientific Reports, 8(1), 4349 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22467-7
Y. Lin, et al., Nature Electronics, 6(7), 506 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-023-00983-3
M. Parashar, V.K. Shukla, and R. Singh, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 31(5), 3729 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-02994-8
A.A. Ismatov, C. Romanitan, Kh.B. Ashurov, M.M. Adilov, and A.A. Rahimov, Eurasian Physical Technical Journal, 22(3(53)), 5 (2025). https://doi.org/10.31489/2025N3/5-13
A.A. Rakhimov, I.K. Khudaykulov, A.A. Ismatov, and M.M. Adilov, East European Journal of Physics, (3), 436-441 (2025). https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2025-3-47
W.H. Tan, S.L. Lee, and C.T. Chong, Key Engineering Materials, 723, 470 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.723.470
S.P. Chai, S.H.S. Zein, and A.R. Mohamed, Diamond and related materials, 16(8), 1656 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2007.02.011
Y. Guo, G. Zhai, Y. Ru, C. Wu, X. Jia, Y. Sun, et al., AIP Advances, 8(3), 035111 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5020936
L.A. Bokobza, and J. Zhang, Express Polymer Letters, 6(7), 601 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.63
A. C. Sparavigna, et al., International Journal of Sciences, 13(7), 1-26 (2024). https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-xw377
F. Taleshi et al., Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures, 22(10), 921 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2012.749456
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
