Methodological principle of interdisciplinarity in the history of economics

Keywords: methodology, interdisciplinarity, economic psychology, economic genetics, econophysics

Abstract

 

Throughout its history, economic science has been influenced by the principles and methods of more exact sciences. This influence can be traced in the concepts of both classical and neoclassical schools. The latter interpreted economic phenomena and processes from a subjective psychological point of view and contributed to the formation of a particular scientific direction – economic psychology. Institutional school that views the economy as an evolving system has generated such an interdisciplinary trend as economic genetics. The influence of exact sciences on the economic thought has manifested itself not only in the wide application of mathematical modeling, but also in the reference to the analogy with physical processes which formed another interdisciplinary research field – econophysics.

Experiencing the influence and employing research methods of natural and exact sciences, economic science in turn ‘penetrates into the territory’ of social disciplines (sociology, politology, history) which generated separate directions of economic analysis: home economics, public choice theory, economic history etc. Such an approach which has not always been favourably received by the experts in related disciplines has been named «economic imperialism» whose representatives are supporters of both neoclassic and new institutional theory.

Methodological mainstream is being replaced by methodological pluralism which would entail the coexistence of different theoretical perspectives and interdisciplinary approach is an essential element in building this tradition. This places new demands on the quality of economic education. A modern economist must have knowledge in different sciences and be able to use their analytic apparatus.

At the post-nonclassical stage in its development the science of economics makes extensive use of interdisciplinary principles and analytical tools of both natural and humanitarian sciences, having achieved notable progress along this path. Interdisciplinary linkages allow us to reveal deeper patterns, bring to a qualitatively new level of scientific knowledge.

Although interdisciplinarity do not always demonstrate effective results it may be considered as one of perspective means of solving complex problems of modern times.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lisovitsky V. M. (2009). History of the economic doctrines. Tsentr uchebnoi literatury (Centre of the educational literature) (in Ukrainian).

Keynes D.M. (1993). General theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Antologija economicheskoi klassiki (in Russian).

Katona G. (1975). Psychological economics. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company. New York.

Kaneman D. (2005) Take a decision in uncertainty. Rules and prejudices. D/ kaneman,P. Slovic, A. Tversky. Kharkov. Gumanitarny tsentr (in Russian).

Kondratev N. D. (1989) Problems of economic dynamics (in Russian).

Rosser-young.(2009). Present and future of econophysics. Voprosy economici № 11 (in Russian).

Kusmartsev Feo.(2011) When rich gets richer there arises financial crisis and Bose – Einsteien condensation in a wild economy// 3rd International conference on Econophysics. Loughborough University/ September 24–28.

Polterovich V. Economics – aggressive science. URL: https//www chaskor.ru/econofizika (in Russian).

Published
2019-01-15
How to Cite
Лісовицький, В. М. (2019). Methodological principle of interdisciplinarity in the history of economics. Bulletin of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Economic Series, (95), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.26565/2311-2379-2018-95-02