Analysis of innovative paradigms of management of innovative development of regions: theoretical basis.

Abstract

The innovative paradigm of managing the innovative development of regions has been improved through a strategic approach that interconnects all links in a single direction – vertical integration and dynamic development of strategic leadership and full coordination of innovations, which: create great opportunities in business; take into account not only technological, but also social benefits, and not only direct benefits; do not take into account the stage of developing fundamental ideas; innovative knowledge takes into account social processes, the transformation of knowledge as a result of the interaction of formalized and informal knowledge, orientation towards the export of high-tech products; based on the unity of technological and non-technological innovations of participants in time and space, interpenetration, integration of technologies, knowledge, and the economy of the ecosystem.
Modern systemic innovation paradigm. Analysis of research on the innovative development of regions, the role of technological changes indicate that the structure of innovative development should take into account not only technological changes, but also systematically consider the relationships and interdependencies in all areas of socio-economic, monetary and financial, managerial, etc., "expanding the separate analysis of private problems into a holistic view of innovative development.
Otherwise, without taking into account the general patterns of development of changes in technologies, a gap appears between the macro, meso and micro levels of economic analysis, as demonstrated in the methodology for assessing GIC (at the macro level) or implementing strategic programs for innovative development (meso, micro levels). That is, only the impact of macroeconomic indicators of individual innovations or even the overall innovative activity of the economy (country, region, organization) is studied and analyzed, at the meso level changes in sectoral and inter-sectoral proportions, shares in GDP and other macroeconomic indicators are studied. Meanwhile, the relationship between the spread of innovations, the possibilities of innovative development and certain structural shifts has been practically not studied. Such a connection, dependence, at best, can be stated. To develop an effective mechanism for managing the innovative development of the country and its regions, it is important to understand, have a clear idea of such relationships, that is, how individual innovation processes are integrated into holistic development directions, the nature of structural shifts and explain the listed processes with the necessary completeness. Therefore, for the effective implementation of IRR programs, it is necessary to determine the main interrelated directions along which one should move and be able to assess the level of IRR, have tools for determining the innovativeness of the economy of regions and the country as a whole, and determining factors to achieve effective development, that is, to determine the innovation paradigm itself. Thus, at the heart of innovative development is a complex relationship and mutual influence of technological, scientific, managerial, economic capabilities and needs of society, the result of such a complex interaction must be studied. The persistence of the skew in the directions of development complicates the understanding of the mechanisms of competition and the selection of alternative programs, technologies, uneven economic growth, does not allow the effective development and formation of development programs without clarifying the causes of technological and structural shifts. The innovation paradigms on which current approaches are based are focused mainly on science, technology and economics and have limited responses to the process of global economic and institutional changes.
Developed economies have refined their core innovation paradigms, such as the role of organized innovation and strong national innovation systems in Finland and Sweden, but have not sufficiently considered the innovation management experience of developing countries such as China, India and the wider Asian region. On the other hand, the contribution of Asian civilizations, represented by China, India and other countries in the Asia-Pacific region, to global development is gradually increasing.