Analysis of the public administration system using the tools of the competence management center
Abstract
The article examines the genesis of scientific ideas about the role of the state in the management of socio-economic development. It is determined that the system of public administration acts as the antithesis of the bureaucratic system of government and promotes effective interaction of the public sector, business structures and civil society, which affects the solution of socially significant problems. The necessity of information exchange in the process of strengthening the public character of management is proved.
A certain beginning in the process of information exchange in the system of public administration is the identification of internal and external personalized information resources, which, depending on the situation, act as representatives of business and civil society, and public administration. The next stages of information exchange in the system of public administration on the basis of the competence management center are the procedures of extraction, processing and analysis of information, which will be further used in the development of the project to solve the problem. A feature of the presented information exchange is the possibility of collecting secondary information that is missing for the preparation of the final decision. At the last stages of information exchange, direct decision-making and implementation, as well as analysis of the final result are carried out.
The center for competence management in the context of the functioning of the public administration system can have a significant impact on the characteristics of the state as a management institution and the social system as such. In our opinion, in clarifying the category of public administration in the context of an effective tool "competence management center", the latter can be interpreted as a special structural unit that manages the flow and use of social intellectual potential in the form of knowledge to solve socially significant problems. a full cycle of procedures for interactive interaction of three groups of actors - institutionally organized representatives of the state, civil society and business, provided by the knowledge management process.
The proposed areas of improvement of information exchange technology in public administration through the use of the functional potential of the competence management center that provides an opportunity for unified information and communication interaction between actors of the internal and external environment of public administration and improves the development and implementation of management decisions.
Downloads
References
Batrymenko, O.V. (2012). Biurokratiia v suchasnomu suspilstvi: sutnist, rol ta tendentsii rozvytku [Bureaucracy in modern society: the essence, role and trends]. Kyiv: Akademvydav [in Ukrainian].
Veber, M. (2013). Hospodarstvo i suspilstvo [Economy and Society]. Kyiv: Vsesvit [in Ukrainian].
Voronov, O.I. (2017). Teoriia i praktyka pryiniattia derzhavno-upravlinskykh rishen v indeterminovanykh umovakh [Theory and practice of public administration decisions in indeterminate conditions]. Odesa: Astroprynt [in Ukrainian].
Zelinskyi, S.E. (2016). Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady kompleksnoho otsiniuvannia derzhavnykh sluzhbovtsiv [Theoretical and methodological principles of comprehensive evaluation of civil servants]. Kyiv: NADU [in Ukrainian].
Klymenko, I.V., Akimov, O.O., Afonin, E.A. (2016). Suchasni modeli kompetentsii derzhavnykh sluzhbovtsiv [Modern models of competencies of civil servants]. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury [in Ukrainian].
Merton, R.K. (2006), Sotsialnaya teoriya i sotsialnaya struktura [Social theory and social structure]. Moskva: AST, Khranitel, [in Russian].
Minenko, M.A. (2014). Publichne upravlinnia: teoriia ta metodolohiia [Public administration: theory and methodology]. Kyiv: Kyiv. nats. torh.-ekon. un-t [in Ukrainian].
Nekrasov, V.N., Buchina, O.V. (2014), Publichnyy kharakter upravleniya sistemoy gosudarstvennykh uslug [The public nature of the management of the system of public services]. Rostov n/D: Profpress [in Russian].
Obushna, N.I. (2017). Instytutsionalni aspekty rozvytku publichnoho audytu v umovakh modernizatsii publichnoho upravlinnia v Ukraini: problemy teorii ta praktyky [Institutional aspects of public audit development in terms of modernization of public administration in Ukraine: problems of theory and practice]. Kyiv: Karavella [in Ukrainian].
Khadzhyradieva, S.K., Voronova, S.V., Kravtsova, N.Ie. (2017). Profesionalizatsiia u sferi publichnoho upravlinnia: stan, problemy, perspektyvy vyrishennia: Suchasnyi kontent profesiinoho rozvytku menedzheriv osvity v umovakh reformuvannia osvitnoi haluzi [Professionalization in the field of public administration: status, problems, prospects: Modern content of professional development of education managers in terms of reforming the education sector]. Mykolaiv: Yemelianova T.V. [in Ukrainian].
Chernov, S., Voronkovа, V., Banakh, V. and other (2016). Publichne upravlinnia ta administruvannia v umovakh informatsiinoho suspilstva: vitchyznianyi i zarubizhnyi dosvid [Public management and administration in an information society: domestic and foreign experience]. Zaporizhzhia: ZDIA [in Ukrainian].
Tsvietkov, V.V., Horbatenko, V.P. (2007). Demokratiia – Upravlinnia – Biurokratiia: v konteksti modernizatsii ukrainskoho suspilstva. [Democracy – Management – Bureaucracy:
in the context of modernization of Ukrainian society]. Kyiv: Instytut derzhavy i prava
im. V.M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
