AN ORIGIN AND DECISION OF CONFLICT SITUATIONS ARE IN CIVIL SOCIETY

Abstract

The analysis of specific of origin of conflicts is done that fold basic part of life of man, group of persons, society and others like that. For their decision and warning it is needed to produce the effective mechanism of management conflicts. Conflicts show a soba large elemental force, with considerable destructive consequences. At the same time it is possible and needed to manage their development and decision, properly diagnosing the dynamics of development of conflict and producing strategy of actions in conflict co-operation. Among influences on development of conflict a central place belongs to his decision. Not all conflicts can be warned far. Therefore it is very important to be able deservingly to go out a conflict. Of conflict envisages activity of both parties in relation to transformation of terms in that they co-operate, removal of reasons of conflict. For this purpose necessary change of opponents (or even one of them), their positions, what of them defended in a conflict. Sometimes, a decision of conflict is base on change of relation of opponents to his object or to each other. Most terms and factors of successful decision of conflicts have psychological character, as they represent the features of behavior and co-operation of opponents. Some researchers distinguish organizational, historical, legal and other factors. Most credible in the decision of conflict, in opinion of scientists, there is the use of compromise, in fact steps to meet, does that even one of parties, allow to attain an asymmetric (one side enters anymore, other – less than) or symmetric (parties yield mutual approximately equal) agreement. The value of compromise appears in that he can be attained in those cases, when parties elect different strategies. Such often is in life.

Civil society has the force and power. And exactly his force is one of major terms of democracy. Accordingly, a central task to development of democracy is a grant of force to this society. The method of decision of this task is needed by not only countries that are on the stage of development but also nations that were up the own civil society. A conflict or consensus nevertheless must score an advantage in human psychology and to become the same by foundation of civil society in ХХІ century. The Ukrainian association must admit also, that is today the best for her: to depend upon the natural way of decision of conflicts (the “prepotent survives” on principle) or sit down for round of negotiations table and due to дискурсу to arrive at to the consensus.