Tendencies of Legal Regulation of Socio-Economic Relations in Construction in Developed Democracies
Abstract
The article presents analysis of particular characteristics of functioning of the legal regulation
mechanism for socio-economic relations in construction. It is substantiated that the government
authorities in developed democracies in this important eld exist in different forms: in the form of several government organizations, a single executive body (ministry) in construction, or respective departments within the integrated ministries (of ecology, regional policy, transport, infrastructure and housing and communal services, etc.). It is noted that such system is centralized in Germany, and, besides federal agencies, as well as land authorities, it includes local self-government, which, along with other issues, also deals with construction. It is noted that the mechanism of government regulation of socio- economic relations in construction in developed democracies is implemented both at the national level and with the help of professional self-regulation and independent experts in this eld. For instance, in France, the architectural and construction control system has a hybrid character. It is noted that the experience of organizing and implementing architectural and construction control in developed democracies is a necessary basis for improving the national system of government architectural and construction control. The international practice regarding participation of independent private specialized bodies and agencies or individual experts in exercising control functions would not only improve the quality of control measures, but also reduce the level of corruption in the city planning sphere.
Downloads
References
Omelchuk, V.O. (2017). Propozytsii shchodo rozrobky novoi stratehii zhytlovoi polityky v Ukraini. Ekonomika ta derzhav [Economy and the state], 12, 24 [in Ukrainian].
Bielenkova, O.Yu. (2014). Tendentsii rozvytku budivelnoi haluzi yak chynnyky formuvannia stratehichnoi konkurentospromozhnosti budivelnykh pidpryiemstv. Budivelne vyrobnytstvo [Building production], 57, 27 [in Ukrainian].
Bibik, N.V. (2014). Investytsiina pryvablyvist budivelnoho pidpryiemstva: ekonomichni pokaznyky otsinky. [Investment attractiveness of a construction company: economic indicators of estimation]. Visnyk Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu, issue 1 (21), 17 [in Ukrainian].
Regulation (European Union) no. 305/2011. URL: http://www.icqc.eu/userfiles/File/regulation-305-2011.doc.
Bibik, N.V. (2014). Mizhnarodna praktyka derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia v sferi budivnytstva. Menedzher [Manager], 1, 117 [in Ukrainian].
Kozych, O.M. (2012). Dosvid providnykh krain svitu v upravlinni budivelnoiu haluzziu. Derzhavne budivnytstvo [State Formation], 2. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/DeBu_2012_2_47 [in Ukrainian].
Joao Branco Pedro, Frits Meijer, Henk Visscher. (2010). Building control systems of European Union countries: A comparison of tasks and responsibilities. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, vol. 2 issue 1, 45–59.
Mogolyuk, V.V.. Stroitelno-pravovoe regulirovanie i tekhnicheskie normy po-nemecki Stroitelno-pravovoe regulirovanie i tehnicheskie normy po-nemecki. URL: https://pandia.ru/text/77/182/37525.php [in Russian].
Matviichuk, A.V. (2014). Poniattia i mekhanizmy finansovoho kontroliu u budivelnii haluzi. [Concepts and mechanisms of financial control in the construction industry]. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannia Ukrainy. Seriia: Pravo, issue 197 (3), 252–263 [in Ukrainian].
Savitskyi, R.Ye. (2015). Zarubizhnyi dosvid zdiisnennia arkhitekturno-budivelnoho kontroliu ta mozhlyvosti yoho vprovadzhennia v Ukraini. Visegrad Journal on Human Right, 3, 106 [in Ukrainian].
Vasylieva, V.A. (2006). Tsyvilno-pravove rehuliuvannia diialnosti z nadannia poserednytskykh posluh. Ivano-Frankivsk : VDV TsIT Prykarpatskoho nats. un-tu im. V. Stefanyka [in Ukrainian].
