CULTURAL REGIMES OF UNCERTAINTY: FROM RENAISSANCE FORTUNE TO THE ECOLOGICAL CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE ANTHROPOCENE

  • Yuliia Tahlina PhD in philosophy, associate professor of the Department of Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4961-6282
  • Kostiantyn Suspitsyn PhD Student, Department of Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1773-4590
Keywords: cultural regimes of uncertainty, randomness, uncertainty, Fortune, virtù, Renaissance, Anthropocene, hyperobjects, ecological consciousness, risk, future, ecological ethics

Abstract

The article examines the evolution of cultural regimes of uncertainty as historically variable ways of culturally interpreting randomness – from the Renaissance conception of Fortune to the ecological consciousness of the Anthropocene. The notion of a “cultural regime of uncertainty” is introduced as an authorial category denoting the set of symbolic practices, images, and modes of interpreting the future through which a culture seeks to render an uncertain world intelligible and amenable to action. Renaissance culture is considered as a regime in which uncertainty is conceptualized through the image of Fortune and the opposition fortuna/virtù, where randomness appears as a space of human agency and the realization of freedom. The experience of the Great Geographical Discoveries is interpreted as a practical embodiment of this logic of risk and openness to the unknown. By contrast, the ecological consciousness of the Anthropocene forms a regime in which uncertainty appears not as a temporary consequence of insufficient knowledge but as a fundamental characteristic of the interaction between humanity and planetary ecological systems. Particular attention is given to Timothy Morton’s concept of hyperobjects, which describes hyperscale ecological phenomena that exceed the limits of human experience. The comparative analysis reveals a transition from a personified to a planetary understanding of randomness, and from a logic of mastering uncertainty to a logic of coexistence with it, which reflects one of the fundamental transformations of cultural consciousness on the path from the Renaissance to the Anthropocene.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Burckhardt J. The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy. London : The Phaidon Press, 1955. 640 p. URL: https://archive.org/details/civilizationofth005644mbp/page/n9/mode/2up.

Chakrabarty D. Climate and Capital: On Conjoined Histories. Critical Inquiry. 2014. Vol. 41. № 1. P. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1086/678154.

Chakrabarty D. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry. 2009. Vol. 35. № 2. P. 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/596640.

Chakrabarty D. One Planet, Many Worlds: The Climate Parallax. Waltham, MA : Brandeis University Press, 2023. 144 p. ISBN 978-1-68458-157-3.

Colebrook C. Extinction and the Anthropocene: to End or Mend the World? A Conversation with Claire Colebrook. New Formations. 2022. No. 107–108. P. 112–130. https://doi.org/10.3898/NewF:107-8.12.2022.

Greenblatt S. Marvelous Possessions: The Wonder of the New World. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1991. URL: https://press.uchicago.edu/dam/ucp/books/pdf/course_intro/978-0-226-52504-4_course_intro.pdf.

Haraway D. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin. Environmental Humanities. 2015. Vol. 6. P. 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615934.

Haraway D. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016. 312 p https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780.

Horváth M., Lovász Á. From the Anthropocene to the Capitalocene and beyond. The Anthropocene Review. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/20530196241270703.

Koselleck R. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York : Columbia University Press, 2004. URL: https://voidnetwork.gr/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Futures-Past.-On-the-Semantics-of-historical-time-by-Reinhart-Koselleck.pdf.

Lee H. The Antinomy of the Anthropocene: The Narrative of Enlightenment in Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Ecological Theory. Theory, Culture & Society. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764241238997.

Machiavelli N. The Prince / ed. by Q. Skinner, R. Price. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1988. 164 p. (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought). ISBN 978-0-521-34993-2.

Moore J. W. How to Read ‘Capitalism in the Web of Life’. Journal of World-Systems Research. 2022. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5195/JWSR.2022.1127.

Morton T. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press, 2013. 240 p.

Pitkin H. F. Fortune Is a Woman: Gender and Politics in the Thought of Niccolò Machiavelli. Berkeley : University of California Press, 1984.

Pocock J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Rev. ed. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1bmzkdg.

Pratt M. L. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. 2nd ed. London ; New York : Routledge, 2008. URL: https://archive.org/details/imperialeyestrav0002prat.

Simon Z. B. The Anthropocene and the Planet. History and Theory. 2023. Vol. 62. No. 2. P. 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12303.

Skinner Q. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Vol. 1: The Renaissance. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1978.

Suspitsyn K. Randomness and the End of the World: Thinking Uncertainty through Hyperobjects. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Philosophical-Political Studies. 2026. Issue 64. P. 275–280. https://doi.org/10.30970/PPS.2026.64.31.

Todorov T. The Conquest of America: The Question of the Other. New York : HarperPerennial, 1984. 274 p. URL: https://archive.org/details/conquestofameric0000unse.

Published
2026-05-27
Cited
How to Cite
Tahlina, Y., & Suspitsyn, K. (2026). CULTURAL REGIMES OF UNCERTAINTY: FROM RENAISSANCE FORTUNE TO THE ECOLOGICAL CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE ANTHROPOCENE. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science", (73), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.26565/2306-6687-2026-73-12