Determinants of Social Change in France at the End of the 18th Century: Sociological Dimensionof

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-6521-2024-53-02

Keywords:

Louis XVI, Old Order, monarchy, enlightened philosophers, French Revolution, social structure, social order, determinants of social change, emancipatory values, public opinion leaders

Abstract

The article characterizes the French monarchy of the last quarter of the 18th century and its role in the events on the eve and during the French Revolution. Some characteristics of the French nobles of the Old Order society are highlighted, which, in particular, led to tectonic socio-political changes in France of that time. It is noted that Louis XVI had sufficient moral and professional virtues, but lacked the appropriate natural leadership qualities, primarily (according to R. Stogdill's theory of leadership traits) energy, self-confidence, perseverance, sociability, and readiness to take responsibility. Against the background of a kaleidoscope of other long-term and short-term events, this contributed to the emergence and spread of social conflicts in France and Europe as a whole in the middle and late 18th century. Attention is drawn to the fact that, together with other factors, such as: socio-political (lack of legitimate political rights for the vast majority of members of society, institutional instability, charismatic opposition, etc.), socio-cultural (fashion, emergence and spread of intellectual innovations, lack of opportunity for the realization of creative energy by a significant part of society), economic (food crisis, unemployment, high taxes), demographic (significant population growth), medical (spread of epidemics), climatic (drought), the mentioned individual characteristics of the French nobles caused a cumulative effect and were reflected in the aggravation of revolutionary events. Revolutionary processes, in turn, after some time led to the formation and development of the French political nation, the spread of liberal ideology and democratic values in Europe and the world as a whole. The direction of further scientific research on the selected issues is determined, primarily the concept of cultural relativism and, in view of this, the study of the increase/decrease in the influence of the charismatic component in the context of the activities of political leaders of the past and present.

Author Biography

  • Vadym Nikolenko, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, 72, Scientific Ave., Dnipro, 49045, Ukraine

    Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Sociology

References

Nisbet R. A. The French Revolution and the Rise of Sociology in France. American Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 1943. Pp. 156-164. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2770361.

Bernstein R. The French Revolution: Right or Wrong? The New York Times. July 10, 1988. URL: https://www.nytimes.com

Wrigley R. The Revolutionary Origins of the Flaneur, Journal 18 a journal of eighteenth-century art and culture, Issue 15 Cities. Spring 2023. URL: https://www.journal18.org/6771

Токвіль А. де. Давній порядок і революція / з фр. пер. Філіпчук Г.; Київ: «Юніверс», 2000. 244 с.

Olsen M. The language of enlightened politics: The Société de 1789 in the French revolution. Comput Hum №23. 1989. Pp. 357-364.

Goldstone, J. A. Reinterpreting the French Revolution [Review of Interpreting the French Revolution, by F. Furet]. Theory and Society, 13(5), 1984. Pp. 697-713. http://www.jstor.org/stable/657247.

Gough H. Recent Publications on French Revolution. The Historical Journal. 1980, 23(4), Pp. 967-983. URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/historical-journal/article/abs/recent-publications-on-the-french-revolution/B35C32ADAF0DC9E821A31365B1696963.

Censer Jack R. Intellectual History and the Causes of the French Revolution, Journal of Social History, Volume 52, Issue 3, Spring, 2019. Pp. 545-554. URL: https://academic.oup.com/jsh/article/52/3/545/5159508.

Кралюк П. М. Ярослав Мудрий. Харків: Фоліо, 2018. 156 с.

Mukunda G. Great Leaders Don’t Need Experience. Harvard Business Review. October 2012. URL: https://hbr.org/2012/10/great-leaders-dont-need-experience.

Aichholzer J., Willmann J. Desired personality traits in politicians: Similar to me but more of a leader. Journal of Research in Personality, Volume 88, 2020. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103990.

Babikian R. Ten King-Maker Traits For A Successful Life. Elite Daily. URL: https://www.elitedaily.com/money/ten-kingmaker-traits-successful-life.

Colbert Amy E., Judge Timothy A., Choi Daejeong, Wang Gang. Assessing the trait theory of leadership using self and observer ratings of personality: The mediating role of contributions to group success. The Leadership Quarterly. Volume 2, Issue 4, 2012. P. 670-685. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984312000215.

Scott N. An Enemy of the French Revolution: Examining Louis XVI’s Role in the French Revolution. Journal of Student Research at Indiana University East, 4(1). 2022. URL: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/jsriue/article/view/34473.

French Society during the late Eighteenth Century. 16 Aug, 2023. URL: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/french-society-during-the-late-eighteenth-century/

Kumar M. French Fashion in the Eighteenth Century. 02 Feb 2023. URL: https://www.tutorialspoint.com/french-fashion-in-the-eighteenth-century.

Burley P. Louis XVI and a New Monarchy (an Institutional and Political Study of France). University of London Ph.D. thesis. (University College, London) (1981). 479 р.

Merton R.K. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press. 1968. 702 p.

Chanel G. Taxation as a Cause of the French Revolution: Setting the Record Straight, Studia Historica Gedanensia. Volume 6, 2015. Pp. 65-81. https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/studia-historica-gedanensia/artykul/taxation-as-a-cause-of-the-french-revolution-setting-the-record-straight.

Greenbaum L. S. Science, medicine, religion: three views of health care in France on the eve of the French Revolution. Studies in eighteenth-century culture. 10. 1981. Pp. 373-391. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11633312/

Локк Д. Два трактати про врядування / Пер. з англ.: О. Терех, Р. Димерець. Київ: Видавництво Соломії Павличко «Основи», 2001. 265 с.

Руссо Ж-Ж. Про суспільну угоду, або принципи політичного права / Пер. з фр. та ком. О. Хома. К: Port-Royal, 2001. 349 c.

Монтеск’є Ш-Л. Про розподіл влади // Кирилюк Ф. М. Історія зарубіжних політичних вчень. Нової доби: Навч. посібник. К.: Центр учбової літератури. 2008. С. 32-34.

Richmond P. A. The Hôtel-Dieu of Paris on the Eve of the Revolution. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 16(4), 1961, 335-353. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24620943.

Стряпко І. Аналіз революцій в Україні на основі теорії Дж. Девіса. Актуальні питання гуманітарних наук. 2014. Вип. 9. С. 149-155.

Oeuvres de Louis XVI: précédées d'une histoire de ce monarque et d'une lettre de M. Berryer, V. 1. Oeuvres de Louis XVI: précédées d'une histoire de ce monarque et d'une lettre de M. Berryer, Louis XV (king of France). 1864. 456 p.

Viguerie J. de. Les idees poltiques de Louis XVI / Itineraire d’un historien: etudes sur une crise de l’intelligence, XVIIe-XXe siècle. Edite par D.M. Morin, 2000. 239-255.

Hue F. Dernières années du règne et de la vie de Louis XVI. H. Plon, 1860. 507 p. URL: https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=yrUUAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=ms&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Mercy-Argenteau F.-C. comte de. Correspondance secrète du comte de Mercy Argenteau avec l'empereur Joseph II et le prince de Kaunitz. Imprimerie Nationale: Partie 1. 1891.

The long and short reasons for why Revolution broke out in France in 1789. A study guide by Swansea university historians. URL: https://www.swansea.ac.uk/history/history-study-guides/the-long-and-short-reasons-for-why-revolution-broke-out-in-france-in-1789/

Theresa M., Mercy-Argenteau F.-C. comte de. Marie-Antoinette: Correspondance Secrète Ente Marie-Thérèse Et Le Cte De Mercy-Argenteau, Publ. Avec Une Intr. Et Des Note S Par A. D'arneth Et A. Geffroy (French Edition). Legare Street Press. July 18, 2023. 572 p.

Louis XVII. Marie-Antoinette et madame Elisabeth. T. 1.

Грицак Я. Й. 26-й процент, або Як подолати історію. Київ: Фонд Порошенка. 2014. 136 с.

Haslip J. Marie Antionette. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, a division of Wheatland Corporation, 1987. 747 p.

Maurice K. Wise. Requisition During the French Revolution (1789-1815), Volume 6. Iss. 1. La. L. Rev., 1944. Pp. 47-62. URL: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol6/iss1/19.

The French Revolution of 1789. East Tennessee State University. URL: https://www.etsu.edu/uschool/faculty/braggj/documents/frenchrevolution.pdf

Pasquino P. «Le concept de nation et les fondements du droit public de la Révolution: Sieyès», L'héritage de la Révolution française, F. Furet ed., Paris, Hachette, 1989.

Barrot O. De la centralisation et de ses effets. Paris: H. Dumineray, 1861. 247 p. URL: https://www.google.com.ua/books/edition/De_la_centralisation_et_de_ses_effets/zM9PAAAAcAAJ?hl=ms&gbpv=1.

Tocqueville A. de. De la démocratie en Amérique. Gallimard Education, 1986. 480 p.

Acemoglu D., Johnson S., & Robinson J. The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change, and Economic Growth. The American Economic Review, 95(3), 2005. Pp. 546-579. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132729.

Published

2024-12-26

Issue

Section

Theoretical and Methodological Problems of Sociology

How to Cite

Determinants of Social Change in France at the End of the 18th Century: Sociological Dimensionof. (2024). Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Sociological Studies of Contemporary Society: Methodology, Theory, Methods, 53, 17-27. https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-6521-2024-53-02

Most read articles by the same author(s)