Classic Content-Analysis and Text Analysis: Terminological and Methodological Differences

Authors

Keywords:

content analysis, text mining, computer content analysis, text data analysis, quantitative content analysis, qualitative content analysis

Abstract

The paper is devoted to conceptual and methodological review of the method of content analysis in relation to the procedures and techniques of quantitative analysis of text data. The author provides definitions of the terms "methodology", "method", "procedure", "technique" in the context of study of texts in social sciences. The basic terminological field of correlation of "classic" content analysis, "text-mining", "computer content analysis" within the framework of qualitative and quantitative paradigms, "analysis of textual data", "analysis of natural language", "quantitative content analysis", "qualitative content analysis" and the theoretical and methodological background of their application are considered. The world experience of classification of methods of quantitative analysis of texts in social sciences and the existing contradictions between the various schools of content analysis are briefly presented. The necessity to update the requirements to the content analysis research in conditions of transition to the information society and use of computer technology in the study of communication is proved.

Author Biography

  • Oleg Ivanov, Humanitarian Problems Research Center of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, 28b Povitroflotsky Ave., Kyiv, 03049, Ukraine

    PhDof Sociology, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Mass Communication, Head of Research Laboratory, Deputy Head of ResearchDepartment of Applied Sociological Research, o.ivanov@kiis.com.ua

Published

2019-08-15

Issue

Section

Theoretical and Methodological Problems of Sociology

How to Cite

Classic Content-Analysis and Text Analysis: Terminological and Methodological Differences. (2019). Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Sociological Studies of Contemporary Society: Methodology, Theory, Methods, 1045, 69-74. https://periodicals.karazin.ua/ssms/article/view/13841

Most read articles by the same author(s)