Support for Political System and Democracy in New Independent States
Abstract
The paper analyses core elements of political culture in post-Soviet Eurasia in the two decades between 1991 and 2010. It compares political transformations in transition countries along the continuum between authoritarian and democratic regimes in the years since the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991. The conceptual framework of the paper is based on the concept of political support by Easton and its further development by Norris, Klingemann, Dalton, Rose, Mishler and Haerpfer. The conceptual lineage overlaps with the distinction between ‘realist’ and ‘idealist’, as well as ‘intrinsic’ and ‘instrumental’ forms of political support. The paper provides a general overview of findings on political support across certain post-communist nations by ordering them from most basic to more specific form of support. The broadest base of support is support for the political community; the next considered level is support for the democratic regime. The last two more specific levels are confidence in parliaments and confidence is expressed for political parties. Post-Soviet countries considered in the paper are Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Moldova and Georgia. World Values Survey 1995, 2005 and European Values Study 2000, 2008 surveys are used as empirical basis of the analysis.
Downloads
References
2. Dalton, Russell J. (2004). Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Diamond, Larry and Linz, Juan (1990). Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
4. Easton, David (1975). “A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support,” British Journal of Political Science.
5. Evans, Geoffrey and Whitefield, Stephen (1995). “The Politics and Economics of Democratic Commitment: Support for Democracy in Transition Societies,” British Journal of Political Science.
6. Haerpfer, Christian W. (2002). Democracy and Enlargement in Post-Communist Europe: The Democratisation of the General Public in Fifteen Central and Eastern European Countries. London and New York: Routledge.
7. Hale, Henry E. (2006). “Democracy or Autocracy on the March? The Coloured Revolutions as Normal Dynamics of Patronal Presidentialism,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies.
8. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (1999). “Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A global analysis,” in Pippa Norris (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Krieckhaus, Jonathan (2004). “The Regime Debate Revisited: A Sensitivity Analysis of Democracy’s Economic Effect,” British Journal of Political Science.
10. Mishler, William T. and Rose, Richard (1999). “Five Years after the Fall: Trajectories of Support for Democracy in Post-communist Europe” in Pippa Norris (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Norris, Pippa (1999). “Introduction: The Growth of Critical Citizens,” in Pippa Norris (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Reich, Gary (2002). “Categorizing Political Regimes: New Data for Old Problems,” Democratization.
13. Rose, Richard, Mishler, William T. and Haerpfer, Christian W. (1998). Democracy and its Alternatives: Understanding Post-communist Societies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14. Samuels, Richard (2003) “Comparing Theories of Democratic Support: Lessons from Post-communist Europe,” Democratization.
