CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL PERSONALITY: MODERN UNDERSTANDING AND THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES
Abstract
Introduction. The issue of legal personality in constitutional law is an important part of modern legal theory and practice, especially in the context of democratic transformations. Defining the role of the actor of constitutional law and its interaction with other participants in the legal system is crucial for ensuring the stability of the legal order and the effectiveness of public administration. However, despite numerous studies, the deeper nature of legal personality and its place in public law still requires further consideration.
Summary of the main results of the study. This article provides a theoretical and legal analysis of the concept of legal personality in constitutional law. The nature of legal personality is examined as an institutional phenomenon that reflects the role of an individual or institution in public legal relations based on constitutional norms. The author emphasizes two key characteristics of legal personality: legal capacity and dispositive legal capacity, revealing their functional significance in the organization and exercise of public power. Special attention is given to the author’s definition of the actor of constitutional law as an active participant in public political and legal relations, endowed with legal capacity and dispositive legal capacity. The significance of legal personality as an integral part of the democratic process, capable of ensuring the legitimacy of public power, is highlighted.
Conclusion. It is emphasized that the concept of legal personality should be expanded by incorporating elements of ethical responsibility and social legitimacy. The necessity for further development of this category based on an interdisciplinary approach that combines legal theory, sociology, philosophy of law, and comparative law is outlined. This will allow for the creation of a coherent and effective model of legal personality that meets the requirements of a modern democratic legal state.
Downloads
References
/References
Січевлюк В. А. Еволюція категорії «правова суб’єктність» (теоретико-прикладні засади) : монографія. Київ: Юридична думка, 2020. 462 с.
Федоренко В. Л. Суб’єкти конституційно-правових відносин: поняття, види, питання конституційної правосуб’єктності. Право України. 2014. № 5. С. 83–91.
Щербанюк О. В. Народний суверенітет і реалізація владоспроможності демократичної держави: монографія. Кн. 2. Київ: Логос, 2013. 306 с.
Савчин М. В. Сучасні тенденції конституціоналізму у контексті глобалізації та правового плюралізму: монографія. Ужгород: РІК-У, 2018. 440 с.
Rosenfeld M. Constitutional Identity. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law / eds. M. Rosenfeld, A. Sajó. : online edn, Oxford Academic, 21 Nov.2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0037 (accessed: 08.04.2025).
Hirschl R., Hudson A. A fair process matters: The relationship between public participation and constitutional legitimacy. Law & Social Inquiry. 2024. Vol. 49. № 4. P. 2074–2101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2023.82 (accessed: 04.04.2025).
Eberle E. J. Human Dignity, Privacy, and Personality in German and American Constitutional Law. Utah Law Review. 1997. Vol. 1997. P. 963–1056. URL: https://docs.rwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1067&context=law_fac_fs (accessed: 06.04.2025).
Troper M. Sovereignty. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law / eds. M. Rosenfeld, A. Sajó. : online edn, Oxford Academic, 21 Nov.2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0019 (accessed: 08.04.2025).
Cassese S. Il diritto amministrativo: storia e prospettive. Milano: Giuffrè Editore, 2010. P. 584.
Tanwar T. The concept of legal personalities. Indian Journal of Integrated Research in Law. 2024. Volume IV. Issue III.P. 356-364.
Шаповал В. М. Суб’єкти конституційного права України: постановка проблем теоретичного визначення. Право України. 2000. № 8. С. 21–24.
Олькіна О. В. Юридичні особи як суб’єкти конституційних правовідносин. Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В.Н. Каразіна. Серія: Право. 2012. Вип. 12. С. 120–123.
Січевлюк В. Категорія "правова суб’єктність": усталені підходи до сприйняття і розуміння та потреба у їх перегляді. Бюлетень Міністерства юстиції України. 2018. № 3. С. 22–28.
Sichevliuk V. A. (2020). Evoliutsiia katehorii "pravova subiektnist" (teoretyko-prykladni zasady) : monohrafiia. Kyiv: Yurydychna dumka. 462 p. [In Ukrainian].
Fedorenko V. (2014). Subiekty konstitutsiino-pravovykh vidnosyn: poniattia, vydy, pytannia konstitutsiinoi pravosubiektnosti. Pravo Ukrainy. № 5. P. 83–91. [In Ukrainian].
Shcherbaniuk O. V. (2013). Narodnyi suverenitet i realizatsiia vladospromozhnosti demokratychnoi derzhavy: monohrafiia. Kn. 2. Kyiv: Lohos, 306 p. [In Ukrainian].
Savchyn M. V. (2018). Suchasni tendentsii konstitutsionalizmu u konteksti hlobalizatsii ta pravovoho pluralizmu: monohrafiia. Uzhhorod: RIK-U. 440 p. [In Ukrainian].
Rosenfeld M. (2012). Constitutional Identity. In: Rosenfeld M., Sajó A. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford Academic, online edn, 21 Nov. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0037 (accessed: 08.04.2025).
Hirschl R., Hudson A. (2024). A fair process matters: The relationship between public participation and constitutional legitimacy. Law & Social Inquiry. Vol. 49, № 4. P. 2074–2101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2023.82 (accessed: 04.04.2025).
Eberle E. J. (1997). Human Dignity, Privacy, and Personality in German and American Constitutional Law. Utah Law Review. P. 963–1056. URL: https://docs.rwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1067&context=law_fac_fs (accessed: 06.04.2025).
Troper M. (2012). Sovereignty. In: Rosenfeld M., Sajó A. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford Academic, online edn, 21 Nov. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0019 (accessed: 08.04.2025).
Cassese S. (2010). Il diritto amministrativo: storia e prospettive. Milano: Giuffrè Editore. 584 p.
Tanwar T. (2024). The concept of legal personalities. Indian Journal of Integrated Research in Law. Volume IV. Issue III. P. 356-364.
Shapoval V. (2000). Subiekty konstitutsiinoho prava Ukrainy: postanovka problem teoretychnoho vyznachennia. Pravo Ukrainy. № 8. S. 21–24 [In Ukrainian].
Olkina O. V. (2012). Yurydychni osoby yak subiekty konstitutsiinykh pravovidnosyn. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia: Pravo. Vol. 12. P. 120–123. [In Ukrainian].
Sichevliuk V. (2018). Katehoriia "pravova subiektnist": ustaleni pidkhody do spryiniattia i rozuminnia ta potrebа u yikh perehliadi. Biuleten Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy. № 3. P. 22–28. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/bmju_2018_3_13 (accessed: 01.04.2025). [In Ukrainian].
Copyright (c) 2025 Вадим Момот

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.