EQUATIONS OF THE TRAJECTORY OF THE HEAD'S MOTION IN THE GROUND WITH THE CONDITION OF ITS CORRECTION AND THEIR EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION
Abstract
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2079-1747-2026-37-13
The primary limitation of the method is the deviation of the tool trajectory from the design path due to various factors, such as soil heterogeneity and positioning inaccuracies. This restricts the application of the method to short distances of up to 15–20 m.
To improve puncture accuracy, trajectory correction of the working body is proposed through adaptation of the tip (head) geometry.
In the event of deviation from the design trajectory, a tip with an asymmetric geometry is employed, generating a controlled imbalance of interaction forces with the soil. This enables purposeful control of the head motion during puncturing, allowing trajectory correction without interrupting the process and without additional intervention in the system.
The conducted research resulted in the development of a mathematical framework, including corresponding equations for trajectory correction of the working body. Key parameters such as soil type, its physical properties, and the inclination angle of the tip were taken into account. The obtained relationships allow prediction of system behavior and provide the capability to improve puncture accuracy under various operating conditions.
Analysis of experimental data showed that the largest trajectory deviations occur at smaller inclination angles of the tip, whereas with increasing angle this effect gradually decreases. In addition, clay soils exhibit the smallest deviations compared to other soil types. In particular, at a distance of 10 m and an inclination angle of 25°, the deviation in sandy loam was about 40 mm, while in clay it was approximately 20 mm. When the angle increases to 55°, these values decrease to 14 mm in sandy loam and 13 mm in clay, respectively. Further increase of the angle to 70° demonstrated that the influence of the inclination angle becomes negligible and no longer significantly affects trajectory deviation. At the same time, the discrepancy between experimental results and theoretical calculations does not exceed 15%, indicating sufficient accuracy of the proposed model and confirming its adequacy under real operating conditions.
The obtained results open new opportunities for improving the accuracy and efficiency of underground utility installation. In particular, they enable an increase in puncture length without loss of process controllability and expand the applicability of the static puncture method in complex engineering-geological conditions, ensuring more reliable and predictable execution of operations.
Downloads
References
Suponyev, VM, Kravets, SV, Posmitiukha, OP & Balesnyi, SP 2021, Naukovi osnovy ta praktyka stvorennia minimalnoenerhoiemnykh robochykh orhaniv dlia formuvannia komunikatsiinykh porozhnyn v grunti [Scientific Foundations and Practice of Creating Minimally Energy-Consuming Working Bodies for Forming Communication Cavities in Soi], KhNADU, Kharkiv. (in Ukrainian).
Tong, H.; Shao, Y. (2022) Mechanical Analysis of DS in Horizontal Directional Drilling. Appl. Sci. 12, 3145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12063145
Wang, Z.Y.; Hu, C.M.; Li, L.; Yang, C.; Liang, H. (2024) Theoretical Analysis of Drilling Fluid Flow for Maxi-Horizontal Directional Drilling. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 15, 04024050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1608
Ehm, G. (2016) The changing pipeline industry. Pipes Pipelines Int. 20, 20–22.
Polak, M.A. (2005) Analysis of polyethylene pipe behaviour in horizontal directional drilling field tests. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 32, 665–677.
Yang, C.J.; Zhu, W.D.; Zhang, W.H.; Zhu, X.H.; Ren, G.X. (2014) Determination of Pipe Pullback Loads in Horizontal Directional Drilling Using an Advanced Computational Dynamic Model. J. Eng. Mech. 140, 0401406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000749
Cai, L.X.; Xu, G.; Polak, M.A.; Knight, M. (2017) Horizontal directional drilling pulling forces prediction methods—A critical review. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 69, 85–93.
Cheng, E.; Polak, M.A. (2007) Theoretical model for calculating pulling loads for pipes in horizontal directional drilling. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 22, 633–643.
Phillips Driscopipe Company. (1993) Technical Expertise Application of Driscopipe in Directional Drilling and River Crossings; Phillips Driscopipe Company: Brownwood, TX, USA.
Drillpath, T.M. (1996) Drillpath Theory and User’s Manual; Infrasoft LLC: Houston, TX, USA.
ASTM F 1962-20; (2020) Standard Guide for the Use of Maxi-Horizontal Directional Drilling for Placement of Polyethylene Pipe or Conduit under Obstacles, Including River Crossings. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
GB 50424-2015; (2015) Code for Construction of Oil and Gas Pipeline Crossing Project. CNPC: Beijing, China.
Polak, M.A.; Lasheen, A. (2001) Mechanical modelling for pipes in horizontal directional drilling. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol, 16, 47–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(02)00020-2
Huey, D.P.; Hair, J.D.; McLeod, K.B. (1996) Installation loading and stress analysis involvedwith pipelines installed in horizontal directional drilling. In Proceedings of the International No-Dig Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, 31 March–3 April 1996.
Cai, L.; Polak, M.A. (2019) A theoretical solution to predict pulling forces in horizontal directional drilling installations. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol, 83, 313–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.09.014
Suponyev V., Kravets S., Balesnyi S., Shevchenko V., Yefymenko A., Ragulin V. Determination of the regularities of the soil punching process by the working body with the asymetric tip. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 2021. № 2/1(110). С. 44-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.230256 ( in Ukraine).
Kravets S.P., Suponyev V.M., Balesnyi S.P. (2017) Establishing Soil Reactions and the Magnitude of Deviations from Axial Movement During Piercing with an Asymmetric Tip. Automotive Transport. Iss. 41. Kharkiv: KhNADU. P. 155-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30977/AT.2219-8342.2017.41.0.155 (in Ukrainian).
Deng, S.; Kang, C.; Bayat, A.; Kuru, E.; Osbak, M.; Barr, K.; Trovato, C. Rheological Properties of Clay-Based Drilling Fluids and Evaluation of Their Hole-Cleaning Performances in Horizontal Directional Drilling. J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. 2020, 11, 04020031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000475
Faghih, A.; Yi, Y.L.; Bayat, A.; Osbak, M. Fluidic Drag Estimation in Horizontal Directional Drilling Based on Flow Equations. J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. 2015, 6, 04015006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000200
Penchuk, VO, Belytsky, DH, Suponyev, VM, Oleksin, VI & Balesnyi, SP 2006, Ustanovka dlia kerovanoho prokolu hruntu [Device for Controlled Soil Piercing], Patent UA 95501. IPC E02F 5/18 (2006.01) ( in Ukraine).
Penchuk, VO, Suponyev, VM, Balesnyi, SP, Oleksin, VI, Shchukin, OV, Sidorov, VV & Usik, SV 2016, Pilotna hruntoprokoliuiucha holovka dlia kerovanoho prokolu [Pilot Soil-Piercing Head for Controlled Piercing], UA Patent 12583 ( in Ukraine).
