Multi-criterion assessment of the priority of environmental protection measures based on open online data
Abstract
Purpose. To develop and test a methodology for multi-criteria assessment of environmental protec-tion priorities using open online data under conditions of incomplete information and interval uncertainty.
Methods. Systems analysis, multi-criteria assessment, an additive utility function, expert weighting of criteria, normalization of heterogeneous indicators, interval analysis, and scenario analysis. Open online sources selected as the information basis: NASA FIRMS for active fires, JRC Global Surface Water for water dynamics, ESA WorldCover and Sentinel-2/Copernicus Data Space for land cover and vegetation indicators, OpenAQ for air quality, HDX for administrative boundaries, Global Forest Watch for tree cover loss, and EkoZagroza as an auxiliary source of environmental threat reports.
Results. The study addresses a practical problem in environmental management: how to justify pri-ority actions when several measures are relevant simultaneously, and the available data have different spatial resolutions, reliability, and completeness. A pilot computational experiment conducted for a condi-tional urbanized area in the Kharkiv region. Six environmental alternatives assessed: greening, cleaning water bodies, reclamation of disturbed lands, strengthening air monitoring, improving waste management, and fire-prevention measures. Six criteria used: environmental effect, implementation cost, implementa-tion time, social significance, risk of inaction, and availability of online data. The highest baseline utility scores obtained for waste management improvement, and fire-prevention measures. The following priori-ties water body cleaning, greening, strengthening of air monitoring, and reclamation of disturbed lands. Scenario analysis showed that the first two alternatives remain the highest-priority group under different weighting assumptions.
Conclusions. The proposed methodology enables formalizing preliminary environmental decision-making even when online data are incomplete. Interval representation does not eliminate uncertainty but makes it explicit and useful for assessing the reliability of ranking results. The method can support the preliminary justification of local environmental protection programs and should be further tested using actual datasets for specific territorial communities.
Downloads
References
Brynza, N. O. (2013). Methods and mathematical models of multi-criteria decision-making under heter-ogeneous interval uncertainty [Candidate dissertation, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electron-ics]. http://openarchive.nure.ua/handle/document/1555 (in Ukrainian)
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA214804
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174084
Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Munda, G. (2008). Social multi-criteria evaluation for a sustainable economy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73703-2
Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Spring-er. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
Zolghadr-Asli, B., Bozorg-Haddad, O., & Chu, X. (2021). A review of 20-year applications of multi-attribute decision-making in environmental and water resources planning and management. Environ-ment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01278-3
Marttunen, M., Mustajoki, J., & Saarikoski, H. (2021). Complementary use of the ecosystem service concept and multi-criteria decision analysis in water management. Environmental Management, 68, 719–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01501-x
Więckowski, J., & Sałabun, W. (2023). Sensitivity analysis approaches in multi-criteria decision analy-sis: A systematic review. Applied Soft Computing, 148, 110915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110915
Digkoglou, P., Papathanasiou, J. (2025). Application of multiple criteria decision aiding in environ-mental policy-making processes. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22, 6967–6982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-06101-w
Multi-criteria evaluation method for the selection of nature-based solutions for urban challenges. (2024). Journal of Environmental Management, 373, 123387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123387
Bousquet M.,Kuller M., Lacroix S., Vanrolleghem P. A. A critical review of multicriteria decision analysis practices in nature-based solutions and green infrastructure planning. Blue-Green Systems, 5(2), 200–219. https://doi.org/10.2166/bgs.2023.132
Barbierato, E., et al. (2023). A method to prioritize and allocate nature-based solutions in urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 235, 104739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104743
Urban green space mapping from Sentinel-2 imagery: Recent applications and vegetation indices. (2025). Urban Science, 9(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9020023
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index threshold-based urban green space mapping from Sentinel-2A imagery. (2022). Land, 11(3), 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11030351
High-resolution greenspace dynamic data cube from Sentinel-2 for urban greenspace monitoring. (2024). Scientific Data. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03746-7
NASA FIRMS. (2026). Active fire data. Retrieved from https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/active_fire/
NASA Earthdata. (2026). Active fire data attributes for MODIS and VIIRS. Retrieved from https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/tools/firms/active-fire-data-attributes-modis-viirs
Google Earth Engine Data Catalog. (2026). JRC Global Surface Water Mapping Layers, v1.4. Retrieved from https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/JRC_GSW1_4_GlobalSurfaceWater
Global Surface Water. (2026). Data access. Retrieved from https://global-surface-water.appspot.com/download
ESA WorldCover. (2026). Worldwide land cover mapping. Retrieved from https://esa-worldcover.org/en
Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem. (2026). Open access to Copernicus Sentinel data and APIs. Re-trieved from https://dataspace.copernicus.eu/
OpenAQ. (2026). OpenAQ API documentation. Retrieved from https://docs.openaq.org/
Humanitarian Data Exchange. (2026). Ukraine - Subnational administrative boundaries. Retrieved from https://data.humdata.org/dataset/cod-ab-ukr
Global Forest Watch Open Data Portal. (2026). Tree cover loss. Retrieved from https://data.globalforestwatch.org/documents/tree-cover-loss/explore
EkoZagroza. (2026). Official resource for recording environmental threats. Retrieved from https://ecozagroza.gov.ua/ (in Ukrainian)
Environmental management systems: Requirements with guidance for use. (2015). DSTU ISO 14001:2015. SE UkrNDNC. https://quality.nuph.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/%D0%94%D0%A1%D0%A2%D0%A3-ISO_14001-2015-.pdf (in Ukraini-an)
OpenAQ R package. (2026). Access air quality data from the OpenAQ API. CRAN. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/openaq/openaq.pdf
Copyright (c) 2026 Brynza N. O.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
