Cognitive-conceptual properties of dialogue in their formal-conversational and pragmatic manifestations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2015-11-04Keywords:
concepts, conceptual space, cognitive contexts, dialogue, intertextuality, formal-conversational, pragmaticAbstract
The article views the dialogue as a compound conceptual space based on the interactants’ cognitive contexts as key sources of Dialogue’s comprehensive intertextuality. Typology of concepts constructing dialogic conceptual space include categorical identity concepts, operative identity concepts, interactive concepts, concepts-ideas, a genre concept, and social-semiotic concepts. Concepts are manifested or marked by formal-conversational and pragmatic means. There seem to be some regular correspondences between concepts’ types and their indexing formal and pragmatic properties of the dialogue.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
