Language-specific means of actualization of cognitive-pragmatic potential of evaluation

Keywords: evaluation, meaning, pragma-cognitive, potential, semantics, denotative, extradenotative

Abstract

Evaluation covers a wide range of linguistic units across various levels of language structure, the study of which is of particular relevance at the current stage of linguistic inquiry, because the correlation and interaction of semantics and pragmatics have become one of the central issues within contemporary linguistic theory. Evaluation constitutes the essence of linguistic presentation of extralinguistic reality. Language dissects reality, restructures it, and then assigns labels to its constituent elements. Throughout the evolution of the linguistic system, evaluation—manifesting itself in explicit form—has crystallized into specific linguistic units such as affixes, lexemes, and particular syntactic constructions. The present article aims to examine language-specific mechanisms for conveying the pragma-cognitive potential of evaluative meaning.

To date, the regularities underlying the emergence of evaluative vocabulary remain insufficiently investigated; particularly, the factors enabling the expression of evaluative attitudes toward referents through lexical means, as it is the word that conveys the entirety of both denotative and extradenotative content. All lexemes containing evaluative meaning can be categorized into: a) mental-evaluative, in which the evaluation comes not from the heart, but from the mind; b) emotional-evaluative, indicating feelings, usually aroused by objects that are socially appraised in a particular way. However, it must be acknowledged that a clear distinction between mental-evaluative and emotional-evaluative vocabulary is not always easily delineated, as affective expressions often incorporate an underlying cognitive appraisal. Evaluative meaning functions as a specific type of cognitive information transmitted through lexical semantics and encapsulates within the definition of a concept the cognitive framework associated with the corresponding linguistic expression. It is regarded as a macrocomponent of a word’s semantic structure, situated within the pragmatic domain and rendered explicit through interpretive mechanisms, i.e., within the realm of semantics. The diversity of evaluative meanings embedded in lexical structures reflects the multifaceted value-oriented perception of reality, as well as the complex interplay between evaluative and affective dimensions in the cognitive process. At the lexical level, evaluative meaning constitutes the conceptual foundation for both specific judgments and the emotions associated with them. It is best understood as a complex cognitive-pragmatic construct.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baider, F., & Cislaru, G. (2014). Linguistic approaches to emotion in context. In F. Baider & G. Cislaru, Linguistic Approaches to Emotions in Context (pp.1-18). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.241.01bai
Díaz, R., & Prinz, J. (2023). The role of emotional awareness in evaluative judgment: Evidence from alexithymia. Scientific Reports, 13, 5183. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32242-y
Foolen, A. (2023). Construction pragmatics in a wider context. An addition to Wen (2022). Lege artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. The journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. Trnava: University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, VIII (1), Special issue, 21-31. https://doi.org/10.34135/lartis.23.8.1.02
Foolen, Ad. (2012). The Relevance of Emotion for Language and Linguistics. In Ad Foolen, U.M.Lüdtke, T.P. Racine, & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving Ourselves, Moving Others: Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language (pp.347-368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Foolen, Ad. P. (2016). Expressives. In L. de Stadler & C. Eyrich (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Semantics (pp.473-490). London and New York: Routledge,
Gowerdowskiy, W. (2002). Affixale Konnotation im Deutschen und im Russischen: Vergleichende Typologie. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
Kosmeda, T., & Kovtun, O. (2024). Modeling of axiologically marked meanings of toponyms and their derivatives in Ukrainian linguistic culture: manifestation of the macroextralingual factor ‘war’. Onomastica, 68, 165-183. https://doi.org/10.17651/ONOMAST.68.11
Kosmeda, T. A., & Haliman, O. V. (2011), «Grammar of assessment» as an actual problem of modern linguistics. Linguistic studies, 22, 17–23. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/lingst_2011_22_5 (in Ukrainian).
Kövecses, Z. (2014). Conceptualizing emotions. A revised cognitive linguistic perspective. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 50 (1), 15-28. Retrieved from https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/psicl
Krysanova, T., & Shevchenko, I. (2021). Conceptual Blending in Multimodal Construction of Negative Emotions in Film. A. Pawelec, A. Shaw, & G. Szpila (Eds.), Text-Image-Music: Crossing the Borders. Intermedial Conversations on the Poetics of Verbal, Visual and Musical Texts. In Honour of Prof. Elzbieta Chrzanowska-Kluczewska (pp.57–371). Berlin: Peter Lang, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3726/b18012
Krysanova, T. A., & Shevchenko, I. S. (2022). Multisemiotic patterns of emotive meaning-making in film. Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology 2(24), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.32342/2523-4463-2022-2-24-20
Lachlan, M.J. (2019). Emotion in Discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.302
Longman. (1991). Longman dictionary of the English language. Longman eBooks. Retrieved from http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA14261119
Mendoza, F. J. R., & Masegosa, A. G. (2014). Cognitive modeling: a linguistic perspective. Amsterdam / Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Roth, W.-M. (2013). On Meaning and Mental Representation: A Pragmatic Approach. Rotterdam.
Published
2025-07-29
How to Cite
Prihodko, G. (2025). Language-specific means of actualization of cognitive-pragmatic potential of evaluation. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, (30), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2025-30-08

Most read articles by the same author(s)