SOCIAL AND SOLIDARITY ECONOMY AS A DIRECTION FOR INCREASING THE ECONOMIC WELFARE OF THE COUNTRY: SEARCH FOR NEW FORMS OF INTERACTION
Abstract
The purpose of writing the article is to find a way out of the situation that has developed in the world economy over the past decades due to the increase in the number of crisis phenomena in the world's economies and the threat of a global economic crisis and environmental disasters. The concern of civil society and academic circles regarding potential threats to stability and growth leads to an increase in interest in finding alternative forms of organizing economic activity and studying the diverse experience of various subjects of the social and solidarity economy. However, despite all the diversity and many years of experience, the activities of such organizations are not widespread, because they have both their own certain strengths (advantages) and a significant number of shortcomings that make it impossible to extrapolate it to all other sectors of economic activity without certain losses and negative effects. Another problem of this sector of the economy is that the activities of such enterprises and organizations are poorly covered by the media against the background of the wider use of advertising in the competitive (commercial) sector of the economy, which is financed from the profits of such companies. One of the ways out of the current situation, we see the search and implementation of new organizational and economic forms of interaction of economic entities, which are based not on competition, but on cooperation (cooperation), such that would contribute to a greater extent to ensuring the goals of sustainable social development ("sustainable development"). The new approaches we propose are based on the use of partial contributions to the capital of joint ventures similar to the "co-partnership" system, which would take into account the interests of all stakeholders. And although this approach is also close to crowdfunding, it has certain differences that provide some advantages compared to existing forms of cooperative participation in capital and labor results. In particular, these are the possibilities for circulation (exchange) of such shares in capital and the security of such obligations with real (commodity) assets or social services. And, if the proposed approaches still require some significant changes to the legislation, the potential from their application in the future may be significant for ensuring the integrity and stability of society and its further development.
Downloads
References
Carroll, L. (2023). Curiosa Mathematica: Pillow-Problems Thought Out During Wakeful Hours. Third Edition. 1894. Xvii, [2], 109 P. Incl. Front. , Diagrs. Creative Media Partners, LLC.
Gallego-Bono, J. R., & Chaves-Avila, R. (2019). How to boost clusters and regional change through cooperative social innovation. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. Vol. 33(1). P. 3108–3124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2019.1696694
Grossman S. J., Hart O. D. (1983). An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econometrica, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 7-45.
Jouvenel, B. B. d. (2009). Ethics of Redistribution. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations.
Kot, L. (2025). Sotsialne pidpryiemnytstvo yak instrument pidvyshchennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky derzhavy. [Social entrepreneurship as a tool for increasing the economic security of the state]. Sustainable economic development. Vol. 5 (56) P. 388–396. https://doi.org/10.32782/2308-1988/2025-56-53.
Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing Organizations: A Guide to Creating Organizations Inspired by the Next Stage in Human Consciousness. Nelson Parker.
Legal frameworks for the social and solidarity economy. (2022) OECDiLibrary,. URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/ 480a47fd-en.
Levitt, S. D., & Dubner, S. J. (2009). Freakonomics. Harper.
López‐Concepción, A., Gil‐Lacruz, A. I., & Saz‐Gil, I. (2021). Stakeholder engagement, Csr development and Sdgs compliance: A systematic review from 2015 to 2021. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2170.
Moldavan, L. (2024). Teoretychni zasady kooperatsii u pratsiakh M. Tuhan-Baranovskoho ta yikh aktualizatsiia v umovakh hlobalizatsiinykh protsesiv i yevrointehratsii. Ekonomika Ukrainy [Theoretical principles of cooperation in the works of M. Tugan-Baranovsky and their actualization in the conditions of globalization processes and European integration]. Economy of Ukraine. Vol. 67(9 (754)). P. 41–63. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2024.09.041.
Nestulya O.O. (2019). Teoriya kooperatsiyi Borysa Martosa [Boris Martos's Theory of Cooperation] / O.O. Nestulya, M.V. Aliman ; za zah. red. O.O. Nestuli. Poltava: PUET,. 258 p. (in Ukrainian)
Orel Y.L., Alyoshkina L.P., Smaglyuk A.A. (2024). Typy rynkovykh system (konkurentsiya, monopoliya, olihopoliya toshcho): vzayemozv"yazok ta yikh vplyv na tsiny, vyrobnytstvo ta ekonomichnyy rezul'tat [Types of market systems (competition, monopoly, oligopoly, etc.): relationship and their impact on prices, production and economic results]. Academic Visions. Issue 35. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13777946.
Panteleimonenko, A. (2024). Cooperatives of entrepreneurs and their business models. Economic scope. https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/191-52.
Poliakova, O. M., & Shramenko, O. V. (2019). Kooperatyvne pidpryiemnytstvo: zmina paradyhmy. Visnyk ekonomiky transportu i promyslovosti [Cooperative Entrepreneurship: A Paradigm Shift]. Bulletin of Transport and Industry Economics. Vol. 65. https://doi.org/10.18664/338.47:338.45.v0i65.160781.
Porter M. E. (1986). Competition in global industries. Harvard Business School Press.
Praktyky sotsial'noyi solidarnoyi ekonomiky: yevropeys'kyy dosvid dlya staloho rozvytku Ukrayiny: monohrafiya. [Social solidarity economy practices: European experience for the sustainable development of Ukraine: a monograph]. (2024). za zah. red. d-rky ekon. nauk, prof. I. M. Sotnyk. Sumy. Sums'kyy derzhavnyy universytet. (in Ukrainian)
R., B., & L., K. (2022). Methodology for the study of the state of implementation of digital tools of external and internal marketing in agricultural cooperatives. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series Economic Sciences, (45), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2307-8030/2022-45-2.
Sklyarenko M.G. (2025). Efekt Kantil'yona, teoriya ekonomichnoho rozvytku Yozefa Shumpetera ta vplyv innovatsiy na dobrobut. [The Cantillon effect, Joseph Schumpeter's theory of economic development and the impact of innovation on welfare]. Change management and innovation. Vol. 14. P. 46–51. URL:https://doi.org/10.32782/cmi/2025-14-7.
Sklyarenko M.G. (2025). Chynnyky rynkovoyi rivnovahy ta ekonomichnyy dobrobut [Factors of market equilibrium and economic welfare]. Scientific works of the Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Economic Sciences. Vol. 1 (77). P. 37–44. URL: https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4536/77-5.
Skrynkovskyy, R., & Tyrkalo, Y. (2021). Social economy and social policy: common features and differences (theoretical aspects). International scientific journal "Internauka". Series: "Economic Sciences", (12(56)). https://doi.org/10.25313/2520-2294-2021-12-7764.
Smith, A. (2006). Wealth of Nations. bnpublishing.com.
Sotnyk I. M. (2022). Sotsial'na ta solidarna ekonomika : navchal'nyy posibnyk [Social and solidarity economy: a textbook]. / I. M. Sotnyk. Sumy : Sums'kyy derzhavnyy universytet. (in Ukrainian)
Villalba-Eguiluz, U., Sahakian, M., González-Jamett, C., & Etxezarreta, E. (2023). Social and solidarity economy insights for the circular economy: Limited-profit and sufficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production. P. 138050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138050
Guevara-Rosero, G. C., Monge, K., Yánez, H., Guachamín, M., & Flor, J. (2024). The impact of fair-trade certifications in social and solidarity economy organizations in Ecuador. Regional Science Policy & Practice. Vol. 16(9). P.100055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100055
Tuhan-Baranovskyy M. Y. (1921). Sotsyal'n'yie osnovy kooperatsiy. [Social foundations of cooperatives]. Berlin. (in Russian)
Holmström B., Milgrom P. (1991). Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, Vol. 7, Special Issue, pp. 24-52.
Hayek, F. A. v. (1990). Denationalisation of money: An analysis of the theory and practice of concurrent currencies (3-d edit.). Institute of Economic Affairs.
Hiez D. Guide pour la rédaction d’un droit de l’économie sociale et solidaire. ESS Forum International. 2021.
Schwab, K., & Vanham, P. (2021). Stakeholder-Kapitalismus: Wie Muss Sich Die Globale Welt Verändern, Damit Sie Allen Dient? - Vorschläge des Weltwirtschaftsforums-Gründers. Wiley & Sons, Limited, John.
Villalba-Eguiluz, U., Egia-Olaizola, A., & Pérez de Mendiguren, J. C. (2020). Convergences between the Social and Solidarity Economy and Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study in the Basque Country. Sustainability. Vol. 12(13). P. 5435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135435
P. H. Wicksteed (1933). Common Sense in Political Economy. London.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.