Sense of Ownership Realization in Social Practices: Prospects for Research and Practical Application

  • Iryna Hubeladze Institute for Social and Political Psychology of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8023-6408
Keywords: sense of ownership, psychological ownership, social practices, practical implementation

Abstract

The article considers the directions of further research development on the implementation of a sense of ownership in various spheres of life and social practices of an individual. It is shown that in addition to the positive impact, the feeling of ownership has its negative side. This raises the question of formation optimal level and manifestation of ownership, what negative and positive consequences an excessive manifestation of ownership can have, what a violation or immaturity of ownership can lead to. It is determined that most research on the psychological nature of property focuses on its individual manifestation. However, it requires a detailed study, including the empirical, how the collective sense of ownership differs from individual and collective and whether it contributes to the effectiveness of collective action. The issue of the impact of new forms of consumption on the living sense of ownership and the attentiveness of intangible property, especially in the conditions of virtual reality, is raised separately. Prospects for further scientific research and possible areas of practical application of the developed author's concept of an ownership sense realization in social practices are outlined. Based on a critical analysis of existing empirical research and reflective consideration, the following areas of further research are proposed: manifestation of material things ownership, territory, money, social relations, own body, virtual environment, civic sphere, as well as opportunities to use the data in both individual and group psychotherapeutic work, counseling and coaching. The necessity of introducing a scientifically substantiated concept into the daily practice of psychologists-practitioners is substantiated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.583

Bermúdez, J.L. (2019). Bodily Ownership, Psychological Ownership, and Psychopathology. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 10, 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0406-3

Fen’ko, A. B. (2005). People and Money: Outlines of Psychology of Need. M.: Nezavysymaya fyrma «Klass». 416 s. [in Russian]

Fernam, A., Arhayl, M. (2005). Money. The psychology of money and financial behavior. Pod obshchey redaktsyey A. Alekseeva. SPb.: Praym-Evroznak. 352 s. [in Russian]

Gallagher, S. (2017). Senses of the sense of ownership. In The Subject’s Matter: Self-Consciousness and the Body, ed. A. Alsmith and F. de Vignemont. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Gineikiene, J., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Auruskeviciene, V. (2016). “Ours” or “theirs”? Psychological ownership and domestic products preferences. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.003

Hubeladze, І.H. (2021). The concept of realizing a sense of ownership of a person in social practices. Psykholohiya i suspil’stvo [Psychology and Society]. 1 (83). [in Ukrainian]

Hubeladze, I. (2020). Psychological features of sense of ownership realization in social networks. Habitus. 20. 214-219. https://doi.org/10.32843/2663-5208.2020.20.39

Hubeladze, I.H. (2020). Social practices possessing as a space of ownership realization. Naukovi studiyi iz sotsial’noyi ta politychnoyi psykholohiyi [Scientific studies on social and political psychology]. 46 (49). 242-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33120/ssj.vi46(49).173 [in Ukrainian]

Jussila, I., Tarkiainen, A., Sarstedt, M. & Hair, J. (2015). Individual Psychological Ownership: Concepts, Evidence, and Impications for Research in Marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 23 (2), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2015.1002330

Karamushka, L. M., Khodakevych, O. H. (2017). Psychological features of student youth attitudes towards money: monohrafiya. Kyiv: KNEU. [in Ukrainian]

Khazratova, N. V. (2009). Psychological nature of a sense of ownership. Sotsial’na psykholohiya [Social Psychology]. 5. 103–110. [in Ukrainian]

Khazratova, N.V. (2004). Psychology of relations between personality and a state. Luts’k. [in Ukrainian]

Khazratova, N.V., Lutsenko, M.YU. (2011). The need for property as a socio-psychological phenomenon. Psykholohiya osobystosti [Psychology of personality]. 1(2). 17-23. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Po_2011_1_4. [in Ukrainian]

Lutsenko, M.YU. (2013). Frustration of property needs as a factor for deforming the value-semantic sector of youth. Dysertatsiya kandydata psykholohichnykh nauk: 19.00.05. Instytut sotsial’noyi ta politychnoyi psykholohiyi NAPN Ukrayiny. K. 180 s. [in Ukrainian]

Martin, M. (1995). Bodily awareness: A sense of ownership. In The Body and the Self, ed. J.L. Bermúdez, A.J. Marcel, and N. Eilan. Cambridge: MIT Press

Matilainen, A., Pohja-Mykrä, M., Lähdesmäki, M., & Kurki, S. (2017). “I feel it is mine!” – Psychological ownership in relation to natural resources. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.002

Myalenko, V. V. (2008). Socio-psychological mechanisms of financial behavior of youth. Dysertatsiya kandydata psykholohichnykh nauk: 19.00.05. Instytut sotsial’noyi ta politychnoyi psykholohiyi NAPN Ukrayiny. K. 193 s. [in Ukrainian]

Nijs, T., Martinovic, B., Verkuyten, M., Sedikides K. (2020). “This country is OURS”: The exclusionary potential of collective psychological ownership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12386

Ostrom, E. (2011). Mans in public. Evolution of the institutes of collective activity. Moskva. [in Russian]

Peck, J., Shu, S. B. (2018). Psychological Ownership and Consumer Behavior. Springer International Publishing. pp. 263. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77158-8

Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T. & Dirks, K.T. (2002). The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research. Review of General Psychology. 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.7.1.84

Social Psychology of Poverty: monohrafiya (2016). Za redaktsiyeyu V.O. Vasyutyns’koho. Kyiv: Milenium. [in Ukrainian]

Social-psychological support for economic socialization: monohrafiya (2018). Za red.N.M. Dembyts’koyi. K.: Instytut psykholohiyi imeni H.S. Kostyuka NAPN Ukrayiny. [in Ukrainian]

Tsakiris, M. (2011). The sense of body ownership. In The Oxford Handbook of the Self, ed. S. Gallagher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Valentino L. (2011). Branch campus administrators: ownership and control. University of Florida.

Verkuyten, M., Martinovic, B. (2017). Collective Psychological Ownership and Intergroup Relations. Perspect Psychol Sci, 12(6), 1021–1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617706514

Zubiashvili, I.K. (2018). Monetary culture as a component of the economic culture of the individual. Aktual’ni problemy psykholohiyi [Actual Problems of Psychology]. 1(52). 40-45. URL: http://www.appsychology.org.ua/data/jrn/v1/i52/9.pdf [in Ukrainian]

Published
2021-07-06
Cited
How to Cite
Hubeladze, I. (2021). Sense of Ownership Realization in Social Practices: Prospects for Research and Practical Application. Visnyk of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Psychology, (70), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.26565/2225-7756-2021-70-08