ZOMBIE AS A FLESH OF (POST)CAPITALISM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2020-62-3Keywords:
zombies, sensuality, (post)capitalism, consumption, fleshAbstract
The article is devoted to the consideration of the image of zombie in two contexts, which are, firstly, the transformation of capitalist figures of production and consumption, and secondly, the transformation of desire and sensuality. Two models of socio-philosophical interpretation of zombies related to the development of capitalism are revealed: the consumer and the proletarian. They concern the discourse of the economic crisis and the disgust to “irrational consumption” and the discourse of the exploitation of the worker by dead labor. It is noted that the image of zombie embodies total alienation, loss of social connection, which is based on emotional affinity, intimacy and affectivity. The figure of zombie is seen as the opposite of the Enlightenment model of human existence, which is characterized by a fundamental multiplicity, sensitivity and taste, which became the basis of a market economy. The image of zombie represents the fear of dissolving human diversity in the identity of desire and corporeality, which is destroyed and appears as “the same”. Zombies embody the instinct and infectivity of being. They denote “naked life”, the signs of which are the right to kill or exploit them. On the other hand, zombies are the embodiment of Use value: an empty post-capitalist, post-proletarian and post-consumer “life” reduced to pure need. Zombies figure represents the inner contradiction of (post)capitalism: on the one hand, the fear of renewing a Labour power that is no longer able to work, and on the other, the fear of losing sensual diversity that suspends the endless process of consumption. Thus, the fear of zombie is a defensive reaction to capitalist existence. On the other hand, it is an adjustment of consciousness, when the coercion to work and consume is based on the fear of becoming a zombie, in the presence of an unconscious willingness to destroy those whom capitalism excludes as zombies.
References
Aristotle. (1981). On Generation and Corruption. (T. Miller, Trans.) In Aristotle, The Collected Writings in 4 Vols. (Vol. 3, pp. 379–440). Moscow: Mysl. (In Russian).
Bishop, K. W. (2010). American Zombie Gothic. The Rise and Fall (and Rise) of the Walking Dead in Popular Culture. Jefferson, London: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers.
Cameron, A. (2012). Zombie Media: Transmission, Reproduction, and the Digital Dead. Cinema Journal, 52(1), 66–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2012.0118.
Chubarov, I. (2014). The Excluded: Logic of Social Stigmatization in Popular Cinema. Logos, 5(101), 97–130. (In Russian).
Harman, C. (2010). Zombie Capitalism: Global Crisis and the Relevance of Marx. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
Hubner, L. (2017). Love, Connection and Intimacy in Zombie Short Fiction. In K. W. Bishop & A. Tenga (Eds.), The Written Dead: Essays on the Literary Zombie (pp. 40–52). Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers.
Hubner, L., Leaning, M., & Manning, P. (Eds.). (2015). The Zombie Renaissance in Popular Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276506.
Jones, St. (2013). XXXombies: Economies of Desire and Disgust. In M. Balaji (Ed.), Thinking Dead: What the Zombie Apocalypse Means (pp. 1–15). New York: Lexington Books.
Land, N. (2012). Making it with Death: Remarks on Thanatos and Desiring-Production. In N. Land, Fanged Noumena. Collected Writings 1987–2007 (pp. 261–287). New York: Urbanomic. Sequence.
Larsen, L. B. (2017). Zombies of Immaterial Labor. Modern Monster and the Consumption of the Self. In S. J. Lauro (Ed.), Zombie Theory: A Reader (pp. 157–170). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt1pwt6zr.14.
Lauro, S. J. (Ed.). (2017). Zombie Theory: A Reader. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt1pwt6zr.
Le Camus, A. (1769). Médecine de L’esprit (Seconde Édition). Paris: Chez Ganeau.
Lloyd, H. M. (2018). Sade’s Philosophical System in its Enlightenment Context. Saint Lucia: Springer International Publishing; Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97196-4.
Lloyd, H. M. (2013). The Discourse of Sensibility: The Knowing Body in the Enlightenment. In H. M. Lloyd (Ed.), The Discourse of Sensibility: The Knowing Body in the Enlightenment (pp. 1–23). New York; London: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02702-9_1.
McGlotten, Sh., & Jones, St. (Eds.). (2014). Zombies and Sexuality. Essays on Desire and the Living Dead. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers.
Murphy, K. (Ed.). (2019). The Zombie Reader. University of Colorado; Boulder: Cognella, Inc.
Smyth, J. (2017). The Toxic University. Zombie Leadership, Academic Rock Stars and Neoliberal Ideology. Huddersfield: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54968-6.
Thacker, E. (2017). In The Dust Of This Planet. (A. Ivanov, Trans.). Horror of Philosophy in 3 Vols. (Vol. 1). Perm: HylePress. (Original work published 2011). (In Russian).
Thacker, E. (2005). The Global Genome. Biotechnology, Politics, and Culture. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.
Woodard, B. (2017). Slime Dynamics. (D. Khamis, Trans.). Perm: HylePress. (Original work published 2012). (In Russian).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
3.gif){kind=logo}
