THE ARCHIVE THAT DOES NOT RELEASE
Abstract
This article offers a philosophical analysis of the archive as a specific space of contemporary publicity in which the loss of orientation occurs not due to a lack of information, but because of an excess of recognition and repetition. It is argued that under conditions of digital media the archive ceases to function as a passive repository of memory and becomes an active environment that retains the subject in the present, depriving them of the possibility of return, reinterpretation, and a change of trajectory. In this regime, the past does not recede or age; instead, it is continuously reproduced, assuming the form of permanent presence. Central to the analysis is the distinction between memory as an orienting resource and the archive as a trap. Particular attention is paid to the phenomenon of post-truth, which is interpreted not as the distortion of facts or the triumph of fabrication, but as a condition in which truth loses its navigational function and becomes an acoustic environment that fixes the subject at the point of recognition. Within this framework, cancel culture appears not as a moral sanction or an act of exclusion, but as a form of archival paralysis, whereby the subject remains visible yet deprived of a future.
The methodological framework of the study is structured around the mythological figures of Hades, Tiresias, and the Sirens, reinterpreted not as metaphors but as analytical models of contemporary publicity. Hades emerges as a structure of time without a horizon, in which truth exists without action; Tiresias figures expert knowledge that requires sacrifice yet bears no responsibility for consequences; and the Sirens function as an aggressive rhetorical interface of the archive, transforming the past into a seductive present. Their song is interpreted as a rhetoric of completion, in which truth no longer opens a path forward but abolishes the need for movement altogether.
In conclusion, the article demonstrates that a philosophical analysis of the archive makes it possible to identify new forms of public violence that operate not through prohibition or coercion, but through a soft, almost caring retention within the past. The study argues for the necessity of restoring a navigational distance between knowledge and trajectory as a condition for the possibility of a future within contemporary publicity.
Downloads
References
Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.
Blanchot, M. (1982). Literature and the original experience. In The space of literature (A. Smock, Trans.; pp. 209–247). University of Nebraska Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Brown, W. (1995). States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton University Press.
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. Routledge.
Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable? Verso.
Chun, W. H. K. (2016). Updating to remain the same: Habitual new media. The MIT Press.
de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). University of California Press.
Dean, J. (2010). Blog theory: Feedback and capture in the circuits of drive. Polity.
Derrida, J. (1995). Archive fever: A Freudian impression (E. Prenowitz, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
Detienne, M., & Vernant, J.-P. (1978). Cunning intelligence in Greek culture and society (J. Lloyd, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). Pantheon Books.
Fisher, M. (2014). Ghosts of my life: Writings on depression, hauntology and lost futures. Zer0 Books.
Girard, R. (1986). The scapegoat (Y. Freccero, Trans.). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Han, B.-C. (2017). Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and new technologies of power (E. Butler, Trans.). Verso.
Homer. (1996). The Odyssey (R. Fagles, Trans.). Penguin Classics.
Kittler, F. A. (1999). Gramophone, film, typewriter (G. Winthrop-Young & M. Wutz, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
Norris, P. (2023). Cancel culture: Myth or reality? Political Studies, 71(1), 145-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211050404
Vernant, J.-P., & Vidal-Naquet, P. (1988). Myth and tragedy in ancient Greece (J. Lloyd, Trans.). Zone Books.
Virilio, P. (2006). Speed and politics: An essay on dromology. Semiotext(e).
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Copyright (c) 2026 Олексій Павленко, Євген Кордюмов
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
3.gif){kind=logo}
