EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE VISUAL IN THE AGE OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: ETHICAL LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTING EDUCATIONAL AND RESEARCH REALITY

Keywords: epistemology, visual image, generative artificial intelligence, epistemic crisis, digital culture

Abstract

The article provides an ethical analysis of the transformed epistemological status of the visual image amid the widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence in educational and scientific environments. The article argues that modern technology is changing the traditional role of the image. From a supplementary illustrative tool, it is transforming into an independent source of knowledge that directly influences the construction of educational reality. The study reveals that generated images, despite their persuasiveness and aesthetic appeal, often lack a referential connection to reality, which leads to a blurring of the boundaries between simulation and the reproduction of the real.

Based on an analysis of classical and contemporary philosophical concepts and examples from educational and scientific discourse, this paper identifies the main ethical issues associated with the functioning of the visual as a construct of reality. In particular, these include the ontological equalization of humans and artificial agents in the educational process, the de-humanization of education, the shifting of responsibility, information overload and a decline in the quality of scientific publications, the fostering of tolerance for errors, and the aestheticization of errors. It has been demonstrated that these risks lead to an epistemic crisis and undermine trust in the visual as a source of knowledge. The study focuses particularly on analyzing the risks associated with the use of generative artificial intelligence in educational materials, especially incorrect representations that may influence students’ perceptions of reality. The article proposes possible solutions to the identified problems, including the introduction of the principle of epistemic transparency of visual content, the formalization of verification procedures within the framework of peer review, and the development of critical visual literacy among participants in the educational and research process.

This study concludes that, in the era of widespread use of generative artificial intelligence, the visual image has become an active factor in the formation of knowledge, which underscores the relevance and necessity of its further philosophical reflection and the development of ethical standards for its use in the fields of education and science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Illia Shein, National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute"

Shein Illia O.

Postgraduate student of the Department 701

National Aerospace University “KhAI”

17 Vadym Manko Street, Kharkiv, Ukraine

References

Vypryrailenko, O. (2026). “Shi postaravsia na slavu”: pidruchnyk NUSh iz zarubizhnoi literatury dlia 8 klasu doviv ukraintsiv do “isteryky”. OBOZ.UA. https://shkola.obozrevatel.com/ukr/news/shi-postaravsya-na-slavu-pidruchnik-nush-iz-zarubizhnoi-literaturi-dlya-8-klasu-doviv-ukraintsiv-do-isteriki/amp.htm

Romanchuk, O. (2025). V Ukraini vpershe zaminyly vykladacha shtuchnym intelektom: choho navchaie studentiv. ZNAY.UA. https://deti.znaj.ua/525972-v-ukrajini-vpershe-zaminili-vikladacha-shtuchnim-intelektom-chogo-navchaye-studentiv

Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1981). https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9904

Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.56315/PSCF3-22Crawford

Debord, G. (2014). The society of the spectacle (K. Knabb, Trans.). Bureau of Public Secrets. (Original work published 1967)

Floridi, L. (2013). The ethics of information. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641321.001.0001

Harari, Y. N. (2024). Nexus: A brief history of information networks from the Stone Age to AI. Random House. https://doi.org/10.26485/ZRL/2024/67.2/14

Hartung, J., Reuter, S., Kulow, V. A., Fähling, M., Spreckelsen, C., & Mrowka, R. (2024). Experts fail to reliably detect AI-generated histological data. Scientific Reports, 14, 28677. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73913-8

Landymore, F. (2026). Professor defends AI textbook. Futurism. https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/professor-defends-ai-textbook

Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005). What do pictures want? The lives and loves of images. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226245904.001.0001

Moores, A., & Zuin Zeidler, V. G. (2025). Don’t Let Generative AI Shape How We See Chemistry. Nature Reviews Chemistry, 9, 649–650. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-024-00633-z

Newport, C. (2024). Slow productivity. The lost art of accomplishment without burnout. Portfolio/Penguin.

Sample, I. (2025). Quality of scientific papers questioned as academics “overwhelmed” by the millions published. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/jul/13/quality-of-scientific-papers-questioned-as-academics-overwhelmed-by-the-millions-published

Shyroka, S., Bilchuk, N., & Piven, H. (2023). Dehumanization in the digital educational process: Philosophical analysis of problems and risks of the modern education system. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Philos.-Political Studies, (49), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.30970/PPS.2023.49.23

Walker, L. (2025). Artificial intelligence in medical education: potential and pitfalls. Australian Journal of General Practice, 54(11), 741–745. https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-08-24-7393

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01100-0.

Published
2026-05-25
Cited
How to Cite
Shein, I. (2026). EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE VISUAL IN THE AGE OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: ETHICAL LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTING EDUCATIONAL AND RESEARCH REALITY. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, (74), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2026-74-11
Section
Articles