Geographical representativeness of the network of reserves and national natural parks of Ukraine

  • Volodymyr Hetman State Ecological Academy of Postgraduate Education and Management of the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9314-0584
  • Serhii Popovych National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3445-5014
Keywords: physical and geographical zoning, landscape diversity, Nature Reserve Fund, reserve index

Abstract

Problem formulation. Assessment of the representation of landscapes in the modern network of Nature Reserve Fund is based on natural and biosphere reserves, national nature parks, which has the status of the highest category in accordance with regional physical and geographical areas - natural areas (subzones), provinces (country), landscape divisions. The constant monitoring analysis of the state of representativeness of the nature reserve fund on the basis of geographical criteria is considered relevant and at the same time difficult.

The purpose. The aim of the research was to assess the degree of representativeness of the modern network of biosphere and nature reserves, national nature parks in accordance with the system of physical and geographical zoning of Ukraine.

Methodology and materials. The methodological basis for the presented analysis can be considered zoning of the earth's surface by components of the natural environment. Accordingly, for comparative analysis used as the main method of identification and accounting of biosphere and nature reserves, national nature parks within the physical-geographical areas, zones and mountainous countries of their location. For the above-mentioned physical and geographical ranks were calculated indicators of nature reserves.

Results. These physical and geographical ranks are not equally provided by the studied objects. Most biosphere and nature reserves, national nature parks are located in the steppe zone (24) and the Ukrainian Carpathians (15). Slightly more than a third (36%) of the physical-geographical provinces are provided with biosphere reserves and reserves. A much higher (80%) degree of representativeness of branches of biosphere and nature reserves, national nature parks has developed at the level of physical and geographical areas. Categorically the most developed and territorially dense regional networks of objects are observed in the Ukrainian Carpathians and Polissya province. Accordingly, most of the biosphere and nature reserves, national nature parks have the following physical and geographical areas of these two natural regions: the Outer Carpathians (8 sites), Polonynsko-Chornohirska (7 sites) and Volyn Polissya (7 sites). The highest reserve index (10,4 %), which is formed by biosphere and nature reserves, national nature parks, was found for the zone of deciduous forests.

Scientific novelty. According to the composition of the physical-geographical provinces, for the first time a complete geographical network of biosphere reserves in Ukraine has been proposed, which should be formed by at least 14 objects. The current level of provision of physical and geographical areas with branches of biosphere and nature reserves, national nature parks is analyzed. In the zonal dimension, the indicators of nature reserves formed by these categories of the nature reserve fund are determined.

Practical meaning. The article provides the functional analysis of the regional distribution of the territory of the Nature Reserve Fund of Ukraine for the optimal conservation and protection of protected landscape diversity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Volodymyr Hetman , State Ecological Academy of Postgraduate Education and Management of the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine

PhD (Geography), Associate Professor, Department of Preservation and Recreational Activities

Serhii Popovych, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

DSc (Biology), Professor, Department of Landscape Architecture and Phytodesign

References

Powell, G.V.N., Barborak, J., Rodriguez, M. (2000). Assessing representativeness of protected natural areas in Costa Rica for conserving biodiversity: a preliminary gap analysis. Biological Conservation, 93, 35–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00115-9

Armenteras, D., Gast, F., Villareal, H. (2003) Andean forest fragmentation and the representativeness of protected natural areas in the eastern Andes, Colombia. Biological Conservation, 113, 245–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00359-2

Hetman, V.I. (2021). Landscape diversity end representativity of the nature reserve fund Ukraine. Kyiv, 107. [in Ukrainian]

Lieskovský, Ju., Bezák, P., Izakovičová, Z. (2010). Protection of representative landscape ecosystem of Slovakia – new landscape ecological approach. Ecology and Environmental. International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geo-Conference SGEM 2010, 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2010.14.20.S1.856

Petrova, L. M. (2004). Structure of the Nature protection network in West Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of USUFWT, 14.8, 80–88. [in Ukrainian]

Udra, I.Kh., Batova, N.I. (2004). Biogeographical assessment of the representativeness of nature reserves of Ukraine in the context of ecological network development. Nature reserves in Ukraine, 1-2 (10), 5–13. [in Ukrainian]

Popovych, S.Yu. (2007). Nature reserves: tutorial. Kyiv, 480 p. [in Ukrainian]

Ivanenko, Ye.І. (2013). Analysis of the Ukrainian nature reserve fund distribution: approach, condition, issues. Ukrainian geographical journal, 3, 64–69. [in Ukrainian]

Rudenko, L.G., Golubtsov, O.G., Chekhniy, V.M., Didukh, Jа.P., Marunyak, E.A., Lisovskyi, S.A., Ivanenko, E.I., Akimov, I.A., Vakarenko, L.P., Vasilyuk, O.V., Vinokurov, D.S., Kostyushin, V.A., Tytar, V.M. (2020). Methodology and practice of assessing the territory of Ukraine for the testament. Edited by Academician of the NAS of Ukraine Rudenko, L.G. Kyiv, 248 p. [in Ukrainian]

Klimov, O.V., Podoba, I.M. (1996). Representation of landscapes in the natural reserve fund of Ukraine. Land-scapeogenesis - 2000: Philosophy and Geography. Problems of postnonclassical methodologies. Theses of the ad-ditional events of the international scientific and practical conference. Kyiv, 75–77. [in Ukrainian].

Popovych, S.Yu. (2012). The formation and current status of Natural Reserve fund of the Ukraine steppe zone. Na-ture reserves in Ukraine, 1-2 (18), 4–11. [in Ukrainian]

Popovych, S.Yu. (2016). The nature reserve fund network of the Ukrainian Polissya. Nature conservarion, 1 (22), 42–47. [in Ukrainian]

Popovych, S.Yu. (2018). Network of nature reserve fund of the zone of deciduous forests of Ukraine. Floristic and coenotic diversity in the restoration, protection and preservation of flora. For the general edited Nikolaenko S.M. Kyiv, 225–247. [in Ukrainian]

Pan-European strategy for the conservation of biological and landscape diversity. (1998). Kyiv, 52. [in Ukraini-an].

Program of perspective development of protected areas in Ukraine («Reserves»). (1994). Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada, No. 48, Art. 430. [in Ukrainian].

Law of Ukraine (2010) «On Basic Principles (Strategy) of the State Ecological Policy of Ukraine» of December 21, 2010, No. 2818-VI. URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2818-17. [in Ukrainian]

Statistical data of the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine at the beginning of 2019. National report on the state of the environment in Ukraine in 2018. (2019). Kyiv, 161. [in Ukrainian]

Armand, D.L. (1975). Landscape Science. M., 287.

Marinich, A.M., Pashchenko, V.M., Shishchenko, P.G. (1985). The nature of the Ukrainian SSR. Landscapes and physical and geographical zoning. Kiеv, 224.

Marynych, O.M., Shyshchenko, P.H. (2005). Physical geography of Ukraine: textbook. Kyiv, 511 [in Ukrainian]

Marynych, O.M., Parkhomenko, H.O., Petrenko, O.M., Shyshchenko, P.H. (2003). Improved physical and geograph-ical zoning of the Ukraine. Ukrainian geographical journal, 41, 16–20. [in Ukrainian]

Melnyk, A.V. (1999). Ukrainian Carpathians: ecological and landscape science of the past. Lviv, 286 [in Ukraini-an]

Physical and geographical zoning of the Ukrainian SSR. (1968). Edited Popov, V.P., Marinich, A.M., Lanko, A.I. Kiеv, 683.

Hetman, V.I. (2006). On natural and landscape zoning. Scientific notes of the National University «Kyiv-Mohyla Academy». Series Biology and Ecology, 54, 63–66. [in Ukrainian]

Hetman, V.I. (2014). Ecological substances: regularities, landscapes, relief: textbook. Kyiv, 71 [in Ukrainian].

Udvardy M. (1984). The IUCN/UNESCO system of biogeographic provinces in relation to the biosphere reserves. 1st Intern. Biosphere Reserve Congr. (Minsk, 26 Sept.–2 Oct., 1983). Paris, 1, 16–19.

Carpathian National Natural Park. (2009). Edited by Prikhodkо, M.M., Kiselyuk, O.I., Yavorskiy, A.I. Ivano-Frankivsk, 672 [in Ukrainian]

Hetman, V.I. (2020). National natural parks of the Forest-Steppe and Steppe of Ukraine. Kyiv, 283 [in Ukrainian]

Pashchenko, V.M. (1979). On the differentiation of landscapes of the North-Steppe Azov region. Physical geogra-phy and geomorphology, 21, 79–88.

Prorochuk, V.V., Stefurak, Yu.P., Brusak, V.P., Derzhipilskiy, L.M. (2013). National Natural Park «Hutsulshchyna». Lviv, 408 [in Ukrainian]

Uzhansky National Nature Park. Polyfunctional value. (2007). Edited Stoykо, S.M. Lviv, 306 [in Ukrainian]

Grodzinsky, M.D. (2014). Landscape ecology: textbook. Kyiv, 550 [in Ukrainian]

Grodzynsky M.D. (2005). Cognition of the landscape: place and space: monograph. In 2 volumes. Kyiv. VPTs “Kyiv University”, 1, 431 [in Ukrainian]

Published
2024-06-01
Cited
How to Cite
Hetman , V., & Popovych, S. (2024). Geographical representativeness of the network of reserves and national natural parks of Ukraine. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series "Geology. Geography. Ecology", (60), 188-198. https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2024-60-13