Changes in the Optical Properties of Semiconductor Quantum Dots under an External Electric Field

Keywords: Schrodinger equation, Quantum dots, Optical susceptibility, Quantum confinement, Density-matrix formalism, Stark shift, Nonlinear absorption

Abstract

The influence of quantum confinement on the energy spectra of spherical semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) made of CdSe, GaP, and GaAs is investigated using the particle-in-a-spherical-box model. We derive discrete energy levels for electrons and holes, demonstrating that the level spacing increases quadratically as the dot radius decreases (∝1/R2). Analytical expressions for the linear and third-order nonlinear interlevel optical absorption coefficients are obtained via the density-matrix formalism, incorporating intraband relaxation and Stark shifts induced by an external static electric field. Numerical results for GaAs QDs reveal that an applied field of F = 100 kV/cm causes significant spectral broadening and a peak reduction of up to $50\%$ at high optical intensities. Our findings demonstrate that both dot size and external fields provide efficient tuning knobs for QD optical responses, with implications for tunable lasers and electro-optic modulators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R.D. Schaller, and V.I. Klimov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 186601 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.186601

C. Wang, M. Shim, and P. Guyot-Sionnest, Science 291, 2390 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5512.2390

J. Sinclair, and E. Dagotto, An introduction to quantum dots: Confinement, synthesis, artificial atoms and applications, (Univ. Tennessee, Knoxville, 2009).

P. Michler, Single Quantum Dots: Fundamentals, Applications and New Concepts (Springer, Berlin, 2003).

P. Martyniuk, and A. Rogalski, Prog. Quantum Electron. 32, 89 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantelec.2008.07.001

A.A. Lagatsky, et al., Prog. Quantum Electron. 34, 1 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantelec.2009.11.001

T. Kippeny, L.A. Swafford, and S.A. Rosenthal, J. Chem. Educ. 79, 1094 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1021/ed079p1094

L.E. Brus, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 5566 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.445676

X. Gao, et al., Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 969 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt994

P.V. Kamat, J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 18737 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp806791s

P. Senellart, et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 1026 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.218

J. Liu, et al., Phys. Rev. B 105, 045302 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.045302

A. Smith, and K. Kumar, J. Appl. Phys. 133, 124301 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0134112

M.R. Shcherbakov, et al., ACS Nano 18, 3105 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c10204

J.M. Harbold, The electronic and optical properties of colloidal lead selenide semiconductor nanocrystals, Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY (2005).

L.E. Brus, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 4403 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.447218

R. Dingle, W. Wiegmann, and C.H. Henry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 827 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.827

A. Harwit, and J.S. Harris Jr., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 685 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.98076

D. Ahn, and S.L. Chuang, Phys. Rev. B 35, 4149 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.35.4149

D. Ahn, and S.L. Chuang, J. Appl. Phys. 62, 1460 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.339638

L.C. West, and S.J. Eglash, Appl. Phys. Lett. 46, 1156 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.95901

B.F. Levine, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 273 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.98213

S.Y. Yuen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 43, 813 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.94502

Y. Kayanuma, Phys. Rev. B 38, 9797 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.38.9797

L.W. Wang, and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 53, 9579 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.53.9579

Published
2026-09-07
Cited
How to Cite
Koraboev, K. A., Sapaev, U. K., Bakirov, G. X., Jurayeva, N. V., Kazakova, M. N., & Qodirov, O. Z. (2026). Changes in the Optical Properties of Semiconductor Quantum Dots under an External Electric Field. East European Journal of Physics, (3), 582-588. https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2026-3-53