Verbalized history: focus on tolerance of historical discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2012-05-01Keywords:
historical discourse, knowledge verbalization, social science, cognitive ethos, ideological bias, toleranceAbstract
This article analyzes specific features inherent in producing and verbalizing historical knowledge. The theoretical arguments and empirical observations are aimed to explain the relations between conventional regulations applied to social science, on the one hand, and individual motivation of historians as actors of cognition and communication, on the other hand. Special attention is paid to tolerance as a critically important quality of historical discourse being on the borderline both with science and ideology and, therefore, simultaneously exposed to opposite trends of scientific tolerance and ideological bias.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
