Thematical Structure of the Journal Discourse& Society: How Did the “Muslim issue” appear
Abstract
The article presents the results of the international scientific publication Discourse & Society analysis since 1990 till present days. This journal is devoted to the research of various public discourses and offers a broad thematic and methodological spectrum to the reader. The aim of the article is to reveal the general topic structure of the discourse analysis and to see the way how the vector of research interests has been changing, the time and the events that have influenced new subjects of analysis. In particular, the emergence of the "Muslim issue" in media and scientific discourse is analyzed in more details. The article presents a quantitative distribution of published articles on topics, identified and characterized for three periods. The multifacetedness of the discourse analysis, the methodological diversity of publications, the prospects of using this research method in sociology are emphasized. In the results of the research, the discursive nature of the emergence of the "Muslim issue" was proved.
Downloads
References
The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010-2050 [Електронний ресурс] // Global Religious Future. Pew Research Reports. – Режим доступу: http://www.globalreligiousfutures.org/countries/ukraine#/?affiliations_religion_id=0&affiliations_year=2010®ion_name=All%20Countries&restrictions_year=2014.
Огієнко І. С. Дискурс та підходи до його аналізу: погляди на проблему сучасних англомовних дослідників [Електронний ресурс] / І. С. Огієнко // Наукові записки Національного університету «Острозька академія». Серія : Філологічна. – 2012. – Вип. 23. – С. 98–102. – Режим доступу : http://lingvj.oa.edu.ua/articles/2012/n23/36.pdf
Серажим К. С. Дискурс як соціолінгвальний феномен сучасного комунікативного простору (методологічний, прагматико-семантичний і жанрово-лінгвістичний аспекти: на матеріалі політичного різновиду українського масовоінформаційного дискурсу) [Текст] : дис... д-ра філол. наук: 10.01.08 / Серажим Катерина Степанівна ; Київський національний ун-т ім. Тараса Шевченка. – К., 2003. - 408 арк.
Макаров М. Л. Основы теории дискурса / Макаров М. Л. – М. : ИТДГК «Гнозис», 2003. – 280 с. – (Научное издание). – С. 55–77.
Кожемякин Е. А. Дискурс-анализ как междисциплинарная методология: исторический аспект / Е. А. Кожемякин // Научные ведомости Белгородского государственного университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. 2008. – №.15, вып. 2. – С. 5–12.
Laclau Е. Postfácio /E. Laclau // de Mendonça D. Pós-estruturalismo e teoria do discurso: em torno de Ernesto Laclau. – EdiPucRs, 2008. – 230 p.
West C. Not just doctors oders: directive-response sequences in patients visits to women and men phisicians / С. West // Discourse & Society. – 1990. – № 1. – P. 85-112
Cook G. ‘A pig is a person’ or ‘You can love a fox and hunt it’: Innovation and tradition in the discursive representation of animals / G. Cook // Discourse & Society. – 2015. – № 5. – С. 587-607.
Методы анализа текста и дискурса / C. Тичер, M. Мейер, P. Водак, E. Веттер. Х. : Гуманитарный центр, 2009. – 356 с.
de Oliveira J. Review on the book: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd edn. London: SAGE, 2009 // Discourse studies. – 2011. – №2. – P. 263-265.
Baker P. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK Press / P. Baker, C. Gabrielatos, M. Khosravinak, M. Krzyzanowski, T. MacEnery, R. Wodak // Discourse & Society. – 2008. – №3. – P. 273-306.
McDonald D., Woodward-Kron R. Member roles and identities in online support groups: Perspectives from corpus and systemic functional linguistics / D. McDonald, R. Woodward-Kron // Discourse & Communication. – 2016. – №10. – P. 157-175.
Mautner G. Time to get wired: Using web-based corpora in critical discourse analysis / G. Mautner // Discourse & Society. – 2005. – №6. – P. 809-828.
Caldas-Coulthard С. R., Moon. R.'Curvy, hunky, kinky' : Using corpora as tools for critical analysis / C. R. Caldas-Coulthard, R. Moon // Discourse & Society. – 2010. – № 2. – С. 99-133.
van Dijk T. Critical discourse analysis / T. van Dijk // The handbook of discourse analysis. – Blackwell, 2001. – P. 352-535.
Mehan H., Nathanson C E., Skelly J. M. Nuclear discourse in the 1980s: the unravelling conventions of the cold war / H. Mehan, C. E. Nathanson, J. M. Skelly // Discourse & Society. – 1990. – № 2. - P. 133-165.
Chilton P., Ilyin M. Metaphor in political discourse: the case of the “common European house” / P. Chilton, M. Ilyin // Discourse & Society. – 1993. – № 1. – P. 7-31.
O`Donnell H. Mapping the mithical: a geopolitic of national sporting stereotypes / H. O`Donnell // Discourse & Society. – 1994. – № 3. – P. 345-380.
Cole C. `Oh wise women of the stalls`/ C. Cole // Discourse & Society. –1991. – № 4. – P 401-411.
Edwards J. After the fall / J. Edwards // Discourse & Society. – 2004. – № 2. – P. 155-184.
Chouliaraki L. Watching 11 September: the politics of pity / L. Chouliaraki // Discourse & Society. – 2004. – № 2. – P. 185-198.
Graham P., Keenan T., Dowd A. A call to arms at the end of history: a discourse–historical analysis of George W. Bush’s declaration of war on terror / P. Graham, T. Keenan, A. Dowd // Discourse & Society. – 2004. – № 2. – P. 199-221.
Lazar A., Lazar M. The discourse of the New World Order: ‘out-casting’ the double face of threat / A. Lazar, M. Lazar // Discourse & Society. – 2004. – 2. – P. 223-242.
Richardson N. `Now is the time to put an end to all this`: argumentative discourse theory and `letters to the editor`/ N. Richardson // Discourse & Society. – 2001. – № 2. – P. 143-168.
Erjavec K., Volcic Z.‘War on terrorism’ as a discursive battleground: Serbian recontextualization of G.W. Bush’s discourse / K. Erjavek, Z. Volcic // Discourse & Society. – 2007. – № 2. – P. 123-127.
Hakam J. The ‘cartoons controversy’: a Critical Discourse Analysis of English-language Arab newspaper discourse / J. Hakam // Discourse & Society. – 2009. – № 1. – P. 33-57.
Khosravnik M. The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election (2005) / M. Khosravnik // Discourse & Society. – 2009. – № 4. – P. 477-498.
Salama A. Ideological collocation and the recontexualization of Wahhabi-Saudi Islam post-9/11: A synergy of corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis / A. Salama // Discourse & Society. – 2011. – № 3. – P. 315-341.
Saghaye-Biria H. American Muslims as radicals? A critical discourse analysis of the US congressional hearing on ‘The Extent of Radicalization in the American Muslim Community and That Community’s Response’ / H. Saghaye-Biria // Discourse & Society. – 2012. – № 5. – P. 508-524.
Cheng J. E. Islamophobia, Muslimophobia or racism? Parliamentary discourses on Islam and Muslims in debates on the minaret ban in Switzerland / J. E. Cheng // Discourse & Society. – 2015. – № 5. – P. 562-586.
Tornberg A., Tornberg P. Combining CDA and topic modeling: Analyzing discursive connections between Islamophobia and anti-feminism on an online forum / A. Tornberg, P. Tornberg // Discourse & Society. – 2016. – № 4. – P. 401-422.
Castro I. C. S. Orientalismo na imprensa brasileira. A representação de árabes e mulçumanos nos jornais'Folha de São Paulo'e'O Estado de São Paulo'antes e depois de 11 de setembro de 2001 : dis. / I. C. S. Castro, Universidade de São Paulo. – 2007, 212 p.
de Moraes R. S. O discurso sobre o muçulmano na imprensa brasileira: o caso da revista Veja : dis. / Rodrigo Simon de Moraes, Universidade de São Paulo. – 2011. – 203 p.
