Network Theories of N. Christakis and M. Granovetter: Heuristic Possibilities in Researching the Social Capital of Local Self-Government
Abstract
The article examines local self-government bodies (LSBs) as a social network and a center for the formation and accumulation of social capital. Social capital is considered as the basis for the activities of LSBs, which, in turn, is the basis for the development of communities in the context of modern socio-political challenges. The focus is on the specific properties of the social network that contribute to the growth of social capital. The heterogeneity and plurality of the concepts of social capital and social network are demonstrated. The hypothesis is put forward that social capital is an important factor in the formation of civil society, as well as the effective functioning of LSBs. Based on John Gaventa's concept of the basic principles of public authority, the properties of the new LSB policy within the framework of the decentralization reform are described. Key concepts of social capital are analyzed (P. Bourdieu, J. Coleman, N. Lin), thanks to which a number of conceptualizations are proposed, in particular LSBs interpreted as a social network with processes of social capital growth. The potential for the formation of social capital is considered through the theories of social networks of N. Christakis and M. Granovetter. Based on the ideas of N. Christakis, it is found that the LSU is a non-spontaneous social network with a special set of connections, in which intragroup connections; cohesion; emergence; the presence of intra-network groups are singled out among the factors of social capital formation. The principle of "weak" ties of M. Granovetter is separately discussed in the optics of the analysis of LSU, according to which "weak" ties "work" as a capacitor of social capital, which opens access to various resources: information, jobs, financial sources, other social and material values. The author summarizes the heuristic prospects of studying LSU as a social network (in particular, as a place of social capital formation) through the prism of the concepts of M. Granovetter and N. Christakis.
Downloads
References
/References
Bourdieu P. The Forms of Capital. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. 1986. URL: https://home.iitk.ac.in/~amman/soc748/bourdieu_forms_of_capital.pdf (дата звернення: 23.01.2023)
Coleman J. S. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. The American Journal of Sociology. 1988. Vol. 94. Pp. 95–120
Putnam R., et al. Social capital: Measurement and consequences. Canadian journal of policy research, 2001. № 2.1. Pp. 41-51.
Фукуяма Ф. Соціальний капітал. Незалежний культурологічний часопис «Ї». 2008. № 53. URL: http://www.ji.lviv.ua/n53texts/fukuyama.htm (дата звернення: 01.02.2025).
Hanifan L. The rural school community center. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1916. No. 67. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1013498 (дата звернення: 10.02.2025).
Гриненко А. М., Кирилюк В. В. Сучасні підходи щодо визначення понять соціальної згуртованості та соціального капіталу. Соціально-трудові відносини: теорія та практика. 2017. № 1 (13). С. 135-141.
Кирилюк В. В. Основні чинники формування соціальної згуртованості суспільства. Вісник Одеського національного університету. Серія : Економіка. Т. 19. Вип. 2 (5). 2014. С. 55-58;
Карпова І. Феномен соціального капіталу: зміст та фактори накопичення. Ефективна економіка. 2014. № 10. URL: http://surl.li/bdeco (дата звернення: 01.02.2025).
Криськов А. А., Криськова Л. П. Соціальний капітал: значення та функції. «Інновації: аспекти управління, виробництва, сфери обслуговування». Матеріали VIII-ої Всеукраїнської науково-практичної конференції пам’яті почесного професора ТНТУ, академіка НАН України М.Г. Чумаченка. ТНТУ імені Івана Пулюя. Тернопіль. 28 березня 2019 року. С. 37-38.
Гірман О. Соціальний капітал як ресурс регіонального розвитку. Державне управління та місцеве самоврядування. 2017. Вип. 4. С. 62-69.
Єрмакова О. А. Соціальний капітал як важливий фактор економічного розвитку України та її регіонів. Вісник Національного університету «Львівська політехніка». Серія : Проблеми економіки та управління. 2016. № 847. С. 88-96.
Gaventa J. Strengthening Participatory Approaches to Local Governance: Learning the Lessons from Abroad. National Civic Review. 2004. P. 16-27.
Штомпка П. Соціальний капітал. Теорія міжособистістного простору. Київ: Дух і літера, 2022. 400 с.
Lin N. A Network Theory of Social Capital. Handbook on Social Capital. 2005. URL: http://www.pro-classic.com/ethnicgv/SN/SC/paper-final-041605.pdf (Дата звернення: 11.02.2023).
Lin N. Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology. 1999. P. 467–487.
Lin N. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2001. P. 280.
Christakis Nickolas A., Fowler James H. Connected: The Surprising Power of our Social Networks and How they Shape our Lives. Little, Brown, New York. 2009. 353 p.
Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology. Volume 78. Issue 6. 1976. URL: https://snap.stanford.edu/class/cs224w-readings/granovetter73weakties.pdf (Дата звернення: 19.02.2025).
Bourdieu, P. (1986). ‘The Forms of Capital’. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, https://home.iitk.ac.in/~amman/soc748/bourdieu_forms_of_capital.pdf
Coleman, J. (1988). ‘Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital’ The American Journal of Sociology, (94), 95–120.
Putnam, R. (2001). ‘Social capital: Measurement and consequences’ Canadian journal of policy research, (2.1), 41-51.
Fukuyama, F. (2008)/ ‘Social capital’. Independent cultural journal "Yi", (53). Available at: http://www.ji.lviv.ua/n53texts/fukuyama.htm (Access date: 01.02.2025) [in Ukrainian];
Grinenko, A. M., & Kyrylyuk, V. V. (2017). Modern approaches to defining the concepts of social cohesion and social capital. Social and labor relations: theory and practice, (1 (13)), 135-141 [in Ukrainian]
Kyrylyuk, V. V. (2014). ‘The main factors in the formation of social cohesion in society’. Bulletin of the Odessa National University. Series: Economics, (19), Is. 2 (5), 55-58 [in Ukrainian]
Karpova, I. (2014). ‘The phenomenon of social capital: content and factors of accumulation’. Effective Economy, (10). URL: http://surl.li/bdeco (Access date: 01.02.2025) [in Ukrainian]
Kryskov, A. A., & Kryskova, L. P. (2019). ‘Social capital: meaning and functions’ “Innovations: aspects of management, production, service sectors”. Proceedings of the VIII All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference in Memory of Honorary Professor of TNTU, Academician of the NAS of Ukraine M.G. Chumachenko. Ivan Pulyuy TNTU. Ternopil. March 28, 2019. P. 37-38.
Girman, O. (2017). ‘Social capital as a resource of regional development’. State administration and local self-government, (4), 62-69.
Ermakova, O. A. (2016). ‘Social capital as an important factor of economic development of Ukraine and its regions’. Bulletin of the National University "Lviv Polytechnic". Series: Problems of Economy and Management, (847), 88-96.
Gaventa, J. (2004) ‘Strengthening Participatory Approaches to Local Governance: Learning the Lessons from Abroad’. National Civic Review, 93(4), 16-27.
Shtompka. P. (2022). Social Capital. Theory of Interpersonal Space. Kyiv: Spirit and Letter [in Ukrainian]
Lin, N. (2005). ‘A Network Theory of Social Capital’. Handbook on Social Capital, Available at: http://www.pro-classic.com/ethnicgv/SN/SC/paper-final-041605.pdf
Lin, N. (1999). ‘Social networks and status attainment’. Annual Review of Sociology, (25), 467-487.
Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christakis, N., Fowler, J. (2009). Connected: The Surprising Power of our Social Networks and How they Shape our Lives. Little, Brown, New York.
Granovetter, M. (1976) ‘The strength of weak ties’ American Journal of Sociology. Volume 78. Issue 6, Available at: https://snap.stanford.edu/class/cs224w-readings/granovetter73weakties.pdf
