URBAN PLACE-NAMES OF UKRAINIAN CITIES AS A TERRITORIAL IDENTITY MARKER
Keywords:
territorial identity, territorial identity markers, urban place-names, local geographic specificity.
Abstract
The technique of urban place-names use as a marker of territorial identity is proposed, in particular the approaches to identify the characteristic urban place-names at the national, macro-regional, regional and local levels within the territory of Ukraine. The specificity of urban place-name set development within the settlement is revealed. Regional differences in the structure of urban place-names of Ukrainian cities have been found and the connection of such differences with local geographical specificity has been displayed. The spatial clusters of Ukrainian cities are distinguished regarding the structure of characteristics urban place-names. The main parameters of such clusters are shown.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Hnatyuk О.М. Iyerarkhichna strukturovanist prostorovoyi identychnosti naselennya Ukrayiny // Ekonomichna ta socialna geografiya: naukovyj zbirnyk. – 2012. – Vyp. 2 (65). – S. 242-250.
2. Yesina Yu.G. Pokazateli identichnosti v regionalnoy kulture Francii (Vandeya, Russilyon): avtoref. dis.…kand. kulturol. nauk: 24.00.01; – Moskwa, 2011. – 21 s.
3. Komarov R. Heroy ta pamyatnyk heroyu yak faktory identychnosti: pryklad Donetska // Skhid-Zakhid: Istoryko-kulturolohichnyj zbirnyk. – 2008. – Vyp. 9–10. – S. 91–99.
4. Melnychuk A.L., Hnatyuk O.M. Nazvy pidpryjemstv ta organizaciy yak marker suspilno-geografichnykh procesiv // Ukrayina: geografiya ciley ta mozhlyvostey. Zbirnyk nauk. prats. – K.: FOP «Lysenko М.М.», 2012. – Т. ІІ. – S. 165-169.
5. Pavlyuk S.G. Tradicionnye i istoricheskiye rayony kak forma territorialnoy samoorganizacii obshchestva: (na primere SSHA i Rossii): avtoref. dis.… kand. geogr. nauk: 25.00.24; Mosk. gos. un-t im. M.V. Lomonosova, geogr. fak. – Moskva, 2007. – 26 s.
6. Pistun M.D. Osnovy teoriyi suspilnoyi geografiyi. Navchalnyj posibnyk. – К.: «Vyshcha shkola», 1996. – 231 s.
7. Brookfield H. On the environment as perceived // Progress in Geography. -1969. - Vol. 1. – P. 51-80.
2. Yesina Yu.G. Pokazateli identichnosti v regionalnoy kulture Francii (Vandeya, Russilyon): avtoref. dis.…kand. kulturol. nauk: 24.00.01; – Moskwa, 2011. – 21 s.
3. Komarov R. Heroy ta pamyatnyk heroyu yak faktory identychnosti: pryklad Donetska // Skhid-Zakhid: Istoryko-kulturolohichnyj zbirnyk. – 2008. – Vyp. 9–10. – S. 91–99.
4. Melnychuk A.L., Hnatyuk O.M. Nazvy pidpryjemstv ta organizaciy yak marker suspilno-geografichnykh procesiv // Ukrayina: geografiya ciley ta mozhlyvostey. Zbirnyk nauk. prats. – K.: FOP «Lysenko М.М.», 2012. – Т. ІІ. – S. 165-169.
5. Pavlyuk S.G. Tradicionnye i istoricheskiye rayony kak forma territorialnoy samoorganizacii obshchestva: (na primere SSHA i Rossii): avtoref. dis.… kand. geogr. nauk: 25.00.24; Mosk. gos. un-t im. M.V. Lomonosova, geogr. fak. – Moskva, 2007. – 26 s.
6. Pistun M.D. Osnovy teoriyi suspilnoyi geografiyi. Navchalnyj posibnyk. – К.: «Vyshcha shkola», 1996. – 231 s.
7. Brookfield H. On the environment as perceived // Progress in Geography. -1969. - Vol. 1. – P. 51-80.
Published
2015-08-11
Cited
How to Cite
Гнатюк, О. (2015). URBAN PLACE-NAMES OF UKRAINIAN CITIES AS A TERRITORIAL IDENTITY MARKER. Human Geography Journal, 15(2), 144-147. https://doi.org/10.26565/2076-1333-2013-15-26
Section
Дослідження молодих науковців
