POETRY AS AN OPPOSITE TO TECHNIQUE AND TO EVERYDAY SPEECH IN THE FUNDAMENTAL ONTOLOGY
Keywords:
poetry, poetic act, everydayness, existence, enframing, techniqueAbstract
The article explores the concept of poetry in the philosophy of Martin Heidegger. Poetry is understood as «a way of disclosing hiddenness» (Heidegger), which is opposed to the everyday speech. Technique is understood as a way of disclosing hiddenness by enframing («The question of technique»). To clarify the concept of everyday speech the concept of everydayness, presented in work by Andrei Lustenko, is analyzed. For Heidegger, poetry is the existential, the essence of language and art. It turned out that poetry is not something exceptional, but that non-poetic speech was not always possible: it was caused by the change of the way of revealing the truth, and the relationship to the sign. As a conclusion in relation to the Heidegger’s philosophy of poetry-technique the need for the opposition of poetry to historical movement of thought, that is established to relate to ways for revealing the truth: by pointing or by signifying, in beauty or in information, by seeing the place in the wholeness of being or by exposing in front of him (subject), purposes (objects), is posited.Downloads
Published
2016-12-14
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
POETRY AS AN OPPOSITE TO TECHNIQUE AND TO EVERYDAY SPEECH IN THE FUNDAMENTAL ONTOLOGY. (2016). The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, 53, 46-58. https://periodicals.karazin.ua/philosophy/article/view/7400


3.gif)



