THE THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE OF SEVERIN BOETHIUS: MAIN CONCEPTS AND MEANINGS IN THE CONTEXT OF MEDIEVAL THEOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2020-63-12Keywords:
epistemology, cognition, divine mind, intellect, knowledge, theologyAbstract
The article considers the issues of some initial provisions of the theory of cognition as part of the theology of the famous medieval thinker Severin Boethius. The main concepts of cognition are considered: reason, intellect, intelligence, divine knowledge, universals, divine mind, simple form and others. The aim of the article is to systematically present the key problems that reveal the place of cognition as an activity that determines the meaning of human existence in the epistemological doctrine of S. Boethius. Arguments in favor of the relationship between the concept of “divine mind” by S. Boethius and the concept of νους (from the Greek “mind”) in Aristotle. The origin of the concept of “simple form” is revealed. Based on conceptual analysis, it has been shown that much of Severin Boethius’ epistemological ideas are borrowed from Aristotle. Research has been conducted on the relationship between the concepts of “simple form” and “divine knowledge” as different types of knowledge acquired through “divine intelligence”. The significance of the concepts of the highest level of cognition is demonstrated and the purpose of their introduction by S. Boethius in the work “Consolation from Philosophy” (in the context of his epistemology) is investigated. The reasons for the diversity of means of cognition and types of knowledge, as well as the reasons for their different perfection (according to the principle of hierarchical nesting) are identified. It has been determined that the metaphysical entities that participated in such a division are destiny, providence, and the divine mind. The human use different means of cognition in education and science has been studied and the distribution of means of cognition and types of knowledge in accordance with individual sciences according to the classification of S. Boethius has been established. The result of the study is a theological interpretation of the views of S. Boethius on the limits and possibilities of human knowledge and purpose of human as a being created by God.
References
Aristotle. (2018). Metaphysics. (A. Markov, Trans.). Moscow: Ripol Classic. (In Russian).
Blackwood, S. (2015). The Consolation of Boethius as Poetic Liturgy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718314.001.0001.
Boethius, S. (1918). The Theological Tractates and The Consolation of Philosophy with an English Translation from the Latin. (H. F. Stewart & E. K. Rand, Trans.) Portsmouth: Heinemann. (In Latin & English).
Boethius, S. (1934). The Consolation of Philosophy, Five Books. Vienna: Hoelder-Pilcher-Tempsky; Leipzig: Academic Publishing Society. (In Latin).
Boethius, S. (2020). The Consolation of Philosophy. (A. Sodomora, Trans.). Lviv: Apriori. (In Ukrainian).
Bokal, A. V. (2003). Problematization of the Ontological Status of Universals in the Philosophical Heritage of S. Boethius. The Herald of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Philosophy. Political science), 54, 10–11. (In Ukrainian).
Chadwick, H. (1981). Boethius, the Consolations of Music, Logic, Theology, and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; New York: Clarendon Press.
Gruber, J. (1978). Kommentar zu Boethius de Consolatione Philosophiae. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. (In German).
Kondziolka, V. (2020). The Last Roman. In S. Boethius. The Consolation of Philosophy (pp. 19–48). (A. Sodomora, Trans.). Lviv: Apriori. (In Ukrainian).
Kotusenko, V. (2016). Evolution of Some Epistemological Ideas in the Philosophy of Western European Middle Ages. NaUKMA Research Papers in Philosophy and Religious, 180 (Philosophy and Religious Studies), 30–36. (In Ukrainian).
Kulyk, M. R. (2020). The Concepts of “Divina Intellegentia” and “Simplicia Forma” in the Theological Epistemology of Severin Boethius. In Proceedings from the International Scientific Conference “Days of Science of the Faculty of Philosophy – 2020” (Part 1, pp. 10–11). (In Ukrainian).
Magee, J. (1989). Boethius on Signification and Mind. Leiden; New York: E. J. Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004320741.
Marenbon, J. (2003). Boethius. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195134079.001.0001.
Marenbon, J. (Ed.). (2009). The Cambridge Companion to Boethius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521872669.
Phidenko, S. (2006). Severinus Boethius: Logical Interpretation of the Trinitarian Problem. Ukrainian Religious Studies, 38, 20–31. (In Ukrainian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32420/2006.38.1720.
Radlov, E. L. (1902). Form, In Philosophy. In Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Efron (Vol. XXXVI). Saint Petersburg: Joint Stock Publishing Company F. A. Brockhaus – I. A. Efron. (In Russian).
Spade, P. V. (Ed.). (1994). Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals: Porphyry, Boethius, Abelard, Duns Scotus, Ockham. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Suto, T. (2011). Boethius on Mind, Grammar and Logic. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004216044.
Zhadko, K. (2011). Religious and Philosophical Alternatives in Self-Organization of Community. Humanitarian Bulletin of Zaporizhzhia State Engineering Academy, 46, 225–234. (In Ukrainian).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
3.gif){kind=logo}
