HOMO MILITARIS: WHY DO HUMANS WANT TO WAGE WARS?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2019-61-7

Keywords:

war, peace, human nature, philosophy of war, homo militaris

Abstract

The phenomenon of war occupies one of the leading places in socio-philosophical and cultural studies. War also has an ambiguous position in human life. On the historical map we see the ongoing waves of armed conflicts, which inevitably lead to fatal consequences for countries, peoples and human beings. War mainly appears in the form of horrors and tragedies. However, in philosophical studies, war is considered from different angles. Philosophers often emphasize the ambiguity and multidimensionality of war. In this work, the authors analyze the phenomenon of war, given a certain “attractiveness” and even the “necessity” of this phenomenon for humans. The authors also summarize the available range of answers to the question of where the desire for violence comes from, that is, the so-called “thirst for war”. It is this desire that gives rise to a constant stay of people in a state of war. The results of this study show that war is indeed an important phenomenon, which can also be considered one of the fundamental attributes of human nature. Analyzing various approaches that explain the causes of war (naturalistic, psychological, economic, etc.) the authors note that the source of any armed conflict is precisely the “militancy” in the very essence of homo sapiens. Human beings must constantly fight for their existence. And such a struggle often takes various forms, which can be considered as concrete variants of the same phenomenon. This phenomenon at the theoretical and philosophical level is fixed in the concept of war. Despite the natural sense of horror that the word “war” evokes at the level of everyday consciousness, pain and hope, death and freedom, faith in human and the justice of the universe, as well as a willingness to fight for this justice, are simultaneously hidden under this “ language shell”. All these internally contradictory meanings are united within the framework of the philosophically processed concept of war, and are also embodied in many different “wars” that a person constantly wages due to his / her specific “being structure”. Human, therefore, is a “warring creature,” or, as the authors propose to denote this feature, “homo militaris”.

Author Biographies

  • Kateryna S. Honcharenko, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University; 8/14, Turhenivska str., 01054, Kyiv, Ukraine

    PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy

  • Karina V. Krahel, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University; 8/14, Turhenivska str., 01054, Kyiv, Ukraine

    Undergraduate Student, Faculty of Philosophy and Social Studies

References

Arendt, H. (1970). On Violence. New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.

Arendt, H. (2008). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. (S. Kastalskii & N. Rudnytskaia, Trans.). Moscow: Europe. (Original work published 1963). (In Russian).

Butler, J. (2016). Frames of War. When is Life Grievable? (Yu. Kravchuk, Trans.). Kyiv: Medusa. (Original work published 2009). (In Ukrainian).

Gehlen, A. (1988). On the Systematic Anthropology. (A. Filippov, Trans.). In P. S. Hurevich & Yu. N. Popov (Eds.), The Problem of Man in Western Philosophy: Collected Works (pp. 151–201). Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).

Hobbs, T. (2000). Leviathan or The Matter, Forme and Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil. (R. Dymerets, V. Yermolenko, N. Ivanova, Ye. Miroshnychenko & T. Oliinyk, Trans.). Kyiv: Dukh i Litera. (Original work published 1651). (In Ukrainian).

Kant, I. (2019). Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. Civil Society in Russia. Retrieved from https://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Kant_K_vechnomu_miru.pdf. (Original work published 1795). (In Russian).

Clausewitz, C. von. (2007). On War. Moscow: Eksmo; Saint Petersburg: Midgard. Retrieved from https://hrguru.ucoz.ru/_ld/0/9_2Aw.pdf. (Original work published 1832). (In Russian).

Locke, J. (1988). Two Treatises of Government. In J. Locke, Collected Works in 3 Volumes (Vol. 3, pp. 271–283). (Yu. M. Davidson, Ye. S. Lagutin, Yu. V. Semjonov, N. A. Fjodorov et al., Trans., I. S. Narskii & A. L. Subbotin, Eds.). Moscow: Mysl. (Original work published 1689). (In Russian).

Snesarjov, A. Ye. (2013). Philosophy of War. Moscow: Lomonosov.

Sontag, S. (2013). On Photography. (V. Golyshev, Trans.). Moscow: Ad Marginem. (Original work published 1973). (In Russian).

Sontag, S. (2004). Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Picador / Farrar.

Tolstoy, L. N. (1996). War and Peace. In L. N. Tolstoy, Collected Works in 8 Volumes (Vol. 3, 4). Moscow: Leksika. Retrieved from https://ilibrary.ru/text/11/p.1/index.html. (Original work published 1869).

Foucault, M. (1998). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. (P. Tarashchuk, Trans.). Kyiv: Osnovy. (Original work published 1975). (In Ukrainian).

James, W. (2019). The Moral Equivalent of War. University of Kentucky. Retrieved from https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/moral.html. (Original work published 1910).

Published

2019-12-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

HOMO MILITARIS: WHY DO HUMANS WANT TO WAGE WARS? (2019). The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, 61, 63-71. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2019-61-7