PHILOSOPHY OF PRESENCE: SKOVORODA AND HUMBRECHT (ENLIGHTENMENT AND POSTMODERNITY). DESCRIPTION OF THE CONDITIONS AND POSSIBILITIES OF THE EVENT OF THOUGHT TO INFLUENCE THE CONTEXTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2018-59-8

Keywords:

presence, agent of thinking, philosophical logic of culture, contemporary rationality

Abstract

The current research presents a phenomenological description of the experience of thought as an experience of free self-determination of a philosopher through a combination of his professional activity, life circumstances and texts as projects of self-actualization of a philosopher in his attempts to find himself and to declare his presence in the world. Through sophisticated overlaps and intersections of Work, Speech, and Life as appropriated by a philosophizing person, this stands as an act of perceiving himself, the past and present without mediation; to reveal his presence in this world against depriving himself of a chance to carry out his own philosophical act. Philosophical description is reckoned a description of the cognitive situation, where a philosophizing person finds himself. Here description coincides with self-description, the existential tension of the thinking process in the experience of
self-realization. A philosophical text conveys a state experienced by its creator, things that happened to him (Merab Mamardashvili); it testifies to his presence in the world and for the world. Phenomenology, as its founder Edmund Husserl claims, must be “descriptive psychology” in the first place, thus bringing us to “things themselves”, and only subsequently to transcendental phenomenology. The personalities picked to illustrate this claim are not accidental, as they prove a possibility to bridge receptions of Western philosophy and national icons, even across time and space, becoming symbols of this connection. Skovoroda and Humbrecht are representatives of the culture of presence. Their thoughts and statements, suggest describing things as they are. In such a situation, an important factor is the way of communicating information about oneself, about culture and time by a philosopher present in the world, proving his ability to invent the structures of narration about himself and his presence, to manifest the image of «narrative identity» (Paul Ricoeur), necessary for the self-formation of a person. The philosophy of presence refers to yet another story: how philosophy defines its attitude to the world via its presence in the world, determining its role in the relations with the world, which it is forced to enter. At the moment of text creation, the non-empirical Self of a philosopher becomes a matter (text), in this sense, a philosophical work is performative, aimed at the implementation of thought, which revealed itself for that purpose, namely to influence the contexts (society, history, and culture). The emphasis is placed on the formation of the philosophical logic of modern culture and the principles on which it is formed, which enables a broader understanding of logic and of contemporary rationality.

Author Biographies

  • Nadiia S. Korablova, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University; 6, Svobody sqr., 61022, Kharkiv, Ukraine

    D.Sc. in Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Theoretical and Practical Philosophy named after Professor J. B. Schad

  • Ganna P. Chmil, The Institute for Cultural Research (Institute of Culturology) of National Academy of Arts of Ukraine; 50-52, Taras Shevchenko blvd, 01032, Kyiv, Ukraine

    D.Sc. in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Academician of National Academy of Arts of Ukraine

References

Ado, P. (2014) What is Ancient Philosophy? (S. L. Yosypenko, Trans.). Kyiv: Novyi Akropol. (Original work published 1995). (In Ukrainian).

Brown, W. (2015, May 13). On the Danger of Neoliberalism and the Crisis of Democracy. Retrieved from http://s357a.blogspot.com/2015/05/blog-post_13.html. (In Russian).

Brown, W. (2015). Undoing Democracy: Neoliberalism’s Re-Making of State and Subject. (V. Korablyova, Trans.). Topos, 2-3, 11–41. (In Russian).

Golovashchenko, S. I. (2002). European Biblical Studies in Kyiv Academy: Textual Representation of Personalities and Traditions. Magisterium. Istoryko-filosofski studii – Historical and Philosophical Studies, 9, 22–34. (In Ukrainian).

Gumbrecht, H. U. (2006). Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. (S. Zenkin, Trans.). Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. (In Russian).

Hess de Kalve, G. A. (1817). Skovoroda, Ukrainian Philosopher. Ukrainskii vestnik – Ukrainian Journal, IV, 106–119. (In Russian).

Drach, I., Krymskyi, S. B., & Popovych, M. V. (1984). Hryhorii Skovoroda. Kyiv: Molod. (In Ukrainian).

Zakydalskyi, T. (1996). Skovoroda – Narcissus in a Distorted Mirror. National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. Naukovi zapysky – Scientific Notes, 1. Philosophy and Religious Studies, 59–65. (In Ukrainian).

Kultaieva, M. (2014). Anthropotechical Turn and its Social-Philosophical and Philosophical-Educational Implications in Theoretical Research of Peter Slotterdajk. Filosofiia Osvity –Philosophy of Education, 1 (14), 54–75. (In Ukrainian).

Loi, A. M., & Tolstoukhov, A. V. (2000). Practical Philosophy of Today: Subject and Prospects. Praktychna Filosofiia – Practical Philosophy, 1, 6–19. (In Ukrainian).

Ricoeur, P. (1995). Hermeneutics. Ethics. Politics. Moscow: Kami Academia. (In Russian).

Chyzhevsky, D. (1983). Outlines of the History of Philosophy in the Ukraine. Muenich: Ukrainian Free University. (In Ukrainian).

Ern, V. (2000). Struggle for Logos. Grigoriy Savvich Skovoroda. Life and doctrine. Moscow; Minsk: Logos. (In Russian).

Foucault, M. (1996). What is the Enlightenment? Voprosy metodologii – Methodology Issues, 1–2. (In Russian).

Habermas, J. (2003). Philosophical Discourse on Modernity. (M. Belyaev, K. Kostin, E. Petrenko, I. Rozanov, G. Severskaya, Trans.). Moscow: Ves mir. (Original work published 1985). (In Russian).

Zakydalsky, T. (1965). The Theory of Man in the Philosophy of Skovoroda (M. A. Thesis). Bryn Mawr College.

Published

2018-12-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PHILOSOPHY OF PRESENCE: SKOVORODA AND HUMBRECHT (ENLIGHTENMENT AND POSTMODERNITY). DESCRIPTION OF THE CONDITIONS AND POSSIBILITIES OF THE EVENT OF THOUGHT TO INFLUENCE THE CONTEXTS. (2018). The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, 59, 85-96. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2018-59-8