MNEMOTECHNIC OF PAIN: BETWEEN SUFFERING AND ENJOYMENT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2018-59-2

Keywords:

pain, suffering, memory, mnemotechnic, graphism of pain, enjoyment

Abstract

The article analyzed the problem of mnemotechnic of pain in the context of the historical transformation of thinking from archaic bodily practices of graphism of pain to the modern culture of anesthesia. The conceptual knot, which forms pain, suffering, memory, procedures of designation and enjoyment, is defined. Subject is defined to be central that goes beyond the opposition/dialectic of myth and reason. This allows us to turn to the premythic and to analyze the graphism of pain as the basis of human existence in the context of the formation of individual and collective memory. In the meantime, the myth is interpreted as an attempt to portray the labeled physical bodies of the world, given the distinction between them. The formation of relations of power is associated with the establishment of a correlation between sign and pain, which makes it possible to understand of pain as the basis of social memory. On the other hand, the historical-philosophical subject is distinguished, according to which the bodily topical of the perceptions and the metabodily topic of concepts are distinguished. The metaphysical shift laid down by the ancient philosophers transforms mnemotechnic into practice, which constantly takes into account the distinction between the sensual (physical) and the supersensual (spiritual), the ideal and the real, the true and the false, the one and the plural, being and non-existence. Mnemotechnic, which constitutes the metaphysical world, excludes the body as a matter of memory, leaving the pain beyond the added significance. Probably, it is possible to link the excesses of Sade’s search for enjoyment and cases of dramatic erosion of man to naked bodility, which captures the outbreaks of violence and torture in the century. In the end, it transforms modern culture into a culture of anesthesia, a culture of memory as an anesthetic, directed against the repetition of pain. Nevertheless, at the same time, it causes new pleasures to seek pain.

Author Biography

  • Oleh М. Perepelytsia, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University; 6, Svobody sqr., 61022, Kharkiv, Ukraine

    D.Sc.  in Philosophy, Head of the Department of Theoretical and Practical Philosophy named after Professor J. B. Schad

References

Abramović, M. (2015). Walk Through Walls: A Memoir. New York: Crown Archetype.

Amery, J. (2015). On the other side of crime and punishment. Moscow: Nowoe izdatelstvo. (In Russian).

Corns, J. (Ed.). (2017). Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Pain. London; New York: Routledge.

Dostoevsky, F. M. (1973). Crime and Punishment. In F. M. Dostoevsky, Complete works in thirty volumes (Vol. 6). Leningrad: Nauka. (Original work published 1866). (In Russian).

Fisher, M. (2014, March 19). Good For Nothing. Retrieved from https://theoccupiedtimes.org/?p=12841.

Foucault, M. (1999). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. (V. Naumov, Trans.). Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. (Original work published 1975). (In Russian).

Heidegger, M. (1993). What is it – philosophy? Voprosy Filosofii – Questions of Philosophy, 8,

–123. (Original work published 1954). (In Russian).

Kamper, D. (2010). Signs as Scars. Graphism of Pain. In D. Kamper, Body. Violence. Pain: Collected Articles. (V. Savchuk, Trans., Ed.). Saint Petersburg: Publishing house of the Russian Christian Academy of Humanities. (In Russian).

Kundera, M. (2002). Immortality. (N. Shulgina, Trans.). Saint Petersburg: Azbuka-classica. (In Russian).

Land, N. (2012). Fanged Noumena. Collected writings 1987–2007. UK: Urbanomic; Sequence Press.

Miller, J.-A. (2017). Introduction to the Clinic of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Nine Spanish Lectures. (N. Muravyeva, Trans.). Moscow: Logos; Gnosis, project letterra.org. (In Russian).

Nietzsche, F. (2002). Beyond Good and Evil, On the Genealogy of Morality. (A. Onyshko, Trans.). Lviv: Litopys. (Original work published 1886). (In Ukrainian).

Perepelytsia, O. M. (2016). Being and Enjoyment: from Descartes’ Subject of Cogito to Sade’s Subject of Imago. Sententiae, 2, 82–93. (In Ukrainian).

Vetlesen, A. J. (2009). A Philosophy of Pain. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.

Yates, F. A. (1997). The Art of Memory. (E. V. Malyshkin, Trans.). Saint Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga. (In Russian).

Published

2018-12-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

MNEMOTECHNIC OF PAIN: BETWEEN SUFFERING AND ENJOYMENT. (2018). The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, 59, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2018-59-2