WHAT WE KNEW ABOUT «A DISCIPLINARY MATRIX» OF SCIENCE, BUT WERE AFRAID TO ASK CONCERNING PHILOSOPHY
Keywords:
philosophical community, distsiplinarity, continuity of philosophical results, thought-case, act of philosophizingAbstract
Going from a concept of «a disciplinary matrix» of T. S. Kuhn as setting a way and structure of the articulation of such phenomenon as «community of scientists», the author of article shows that the disciplinary component has not defining and secondary value concerning philosophical community.
References
Мамардашвили М. К. Одиночество – моя профессия... : [интервью У. Тиронса] / М. Мамардашвили, У. Тиронс // Мамардашвили М. К. Очерк современной европейской философии. – СПб. : Азбука, 2012. – 608 с.
Deleuze G. Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? / Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari. – Paris : Éditions de Minuit, 1991. – 206 p.
Kuhn Th. S. The structure of scientific revolutions / Thomas S. Kuhn. – Chicago and London : The University of Chicago Press, 1996. – 212 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
3.gif){kind=logo}
