Cognitive-pragmatic concept of artistic discourse (based on the language of Olga Kobylyanska)

  • Юлія Манольєвна Руснак Higher State Educational Establishment of Ukraine “Bukovinian State Medical University” https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9941-4411
Keywords: text, discourse, artistic discourse, artistic text, cognitive aspect, cognitema, pragmatic aspect, pragmatema

Abstract

The development of linguistics, a multidisciplinary approach to the coverage of linguistic phenomena have led to a change in the scientific paradigm – the discursive paradigm has come instead of text-centric one. In linguistics a philological discipline has been arised – discourse studies aimed at characterizing the speech communication of people in certain situations taking into account the unity of scientific approaches.

The purpose of the article is  to comprehend the author’s artistic discourse as a philosophical and humanitarian reality, to form a cognitive and pragmatic concept of artistic discourse.

The polysemy of the term discourse makes it possible to use the concept of artistic discourse in two meanings – broad and narrow.

Discourse1, or author's discourse, is a part of cultural space where semiotic units formed according to the laws of certain genres function, in which the author's knowledge, information, assessments, mentality as a representative of a certain sociocultural community are creatively and verbally reproduced and which have a pragmatic load.

In a narrow sense discourse2 means a fragment of text (context). The cognitive aspect (knowledge, information, assessments, mentality in general) is realized in the plan of text – author, pragmatic – in the plane of text – reader, although we are aware that such a division is to some extent conditional.

For effective analysis of artistic discourse in cognitive and pragmatic aspects we consider it`s necessary to enter into scientific circulation two abstract units – cognitema and pragmatema. Cognitema is a generalized unit in which a quantum of information about the world is realized (for example, thinking, color, mental state, etc.). Pragmatema is an abstract unit which has influence into the reader.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Юлія Манольєвна Руснак, Higher State Educational Establishment of Ukraine “Bukovinian State Medical University”

PhD of Philology, Associate Professorof the Department of Social Sciences and Ukrainian Studies

References

Bacevych F. S. Narysy z lingvistychnoyi pragmatyky: monografiya. L`viv: PAIS, 2010. 336 s.

Vinogradov V. V. O jazyke hudozhestvennoj prozy: izbrannye trudy / otv. red.: G. V. Stepanov, A. P. Chudakov. Moskva: Nauka, 1980. 360 s.

Voronovska L. Universalni ta specyfichni osoblyvosti vyznachennya oznak xudozhnogo dyskursu. Teoretychna i dydaktychna filologiya. Pereyaslav-Hmelnyczkyj, 2015. Vyp. 20. S. 155–166.

Golikova N. S. Xudozhnij dyskurs P.A. Zagrebelnogo: lingvokognityvnyj i pragmastylistychnyj aspekty: dys… d-ra filol. nauk: 10.02.01 / Dniprov. nacz. un-t im. Olesya Gonchara. Dnipro, 2019. 529 s. URL: https://chtyvo.org.ua/authors/Holikova_Nataliia/Khudozhnii_dyskurs_P_A_Zahrebelnoho_linhvokohnityvnyi_i_prahmastylistychnyi_aspekty/ (data zvernennia: 20.11.2020).

Golyanych M. I. Vnutrishnya forma slova i xudozhnij tekst: monografiya. Ivano-Frankivsk: Plaj, 1997. 178 s.

Zagnitko A. P. Lingvistyka tekstu: Teoriya i praktykum: nauk.-navch. posib. Doneczk: DonNU, 2006. 289 s.

Zvegincev V. A. Predlozhenie i ego sootnoshenie k jazyku i rechi. Moskva: MGU, 1976. 307 s.

Karasik V. I. Jazykovoj krug: lichnost', koncepty, diskurs. Moskva: Gnozis, 2004. 390 s.

Kobylyanska O. Yu. Zibrannya tvoriv: u 10 t.: Novely. Opovidannya. Poeziyi v prozi / za red. V. I. Antofijchuk [golova], S. D. Kyrylyuk ta in. Chernivci: Bukrek, 2013. T.1. 476 s.

Kondratenko N.V. Dyskursyvna paradygma doslidzhen` xudozhnogo tekstu. Zapysky z romano-germanskoyi filologiyi. Odesa, 2015. Vyp. 1(34). S. 60–65.

Kondratenko N. V. Syntaksys ukrayinskogo modernistskogo i postmodernistskogo xudozhnogo dyskursu: monografiya. Kyiv: Vydavnychyj dim Dmytra Burago, 2012. 328 s.

Popova I. S. Fundamentalni kategoriyi syntaksysu ukrayinskoyi movy u formalno-gramatychnomu ta metamovnomu aspektax: avtoref. na zdobuttya nauk. stupenya doktora filol. nauk: 10.02.01. Chernivci, 2012. 40 s.

Prybluda L. Do problemy vyznachennya statusu hudozhnogo dyskursu. Teoretychna i dydaktychna filologiya. Pereyaslav-Xmelnyckyj, 2013. Vyp. 16. S. 295–301.

Rusnak N. Lingvokognityvni ta pragmatychni vymiry dialektnyx tekstiv bukovynskyx govirok: monografiya. Chernivci: Cherniveczkyj nacz. un-t, 2009. 448 s.

Selivanova O. Suchasna lingvistyka: terminologichna encykl. Poltava: Dovkillya-K, 2006. 716 s.

Stepanov Ju. S. Al'ternativnyj mir, Diskurs, Fakt i princip Prichinnosti. Jazyk i nauka konca 20 veka: sb. st. Moskva: Ros. gos. gumanit. un-t, 1995. S.35–73.

Ukrayinska mova: encyklopediya / za red. Rusanivskogo V. M., Taranenko O. O., Zyablyuka M.P. ta in. Moskva: Vyd-vo «Ukr. encykl.» im. M. Bazhana. 2004. 824 s.

Frolova I. Ye., Omecynska O.V. Specyfika xudozhnogo dyskursu ta jogo aspektiv. Visnyk HNU im. V. N. Karazina. Inozemna filologiya. Harkiv, 2018. Vyp. 87. S.52–61.

Chernjavskaja V. E. Lingvistika teksta: Polikodovost', intertekstual'nost', interdiskursivnost': ucheb. posob. Moskva: Librokom, 2009. 248 s.

Published
2021-01-04
How to Cite
Руснак, Ю. М. (2021). Cognitive-pragmatic concept of artistic discourse (based on the language of Olga Kobylyanska). The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series “Philology”, (87), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-1864-2020-87-12