Geographical factors of territorial branding in local development strategy (on the example of Kovalivska rural community)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2026-64-20

Keywords:

territorial branding, Kovalivska rural community, development strategy, geographical factors, identity, potential, resources, decentralization

Abstract

Territorial branding, when viewed through the prism of geographical factors, involves  the conceptual positioning of a certain territory by highlighting its unique features.  Specific natural, cultural, or economic characteristics of the area, if used effectively,  provide various stakeholders (business community, local residents, potential investors)  with opportunities for business development, formation of a recognizable image of  the territory, and improvement of the quality of life of residents. The purpose of the  study was to determine the impact of socio-geographical factors on the formation of  territorial branding and its role in strategic documents of the basic level of management.  Creating an individual profile of a locality as one of the branding tasks involves the  long-term development of the territory’s economy by stimulating industries with the  greatest potential for growth. Based on this, the Kovalivska rural community of the Kyiv  region was chosen as the object of research in this publication. Given that the concept  of territorial branding should be consistent with individual strategic documents, the  research methodology was based on the characterization of the system of documents  at different organizational levels: State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021-  2027, Kyiv Region Development Strategy for 2021-2027. In order to analyze the local  economic structure, data were taken from the official website of the community, as well  as the Decentralization website and the Open Data Bot service. QGIS was used to  process geodata on the spatial distribution of the population and the structure of land  use distribution.

Results. The analysis of the Kovalivska UTC and the enterprises operating on its territory  allowed us to determine that the main economic activity is agriculture. Almost all of the  land area not occupied by forests is actively used for the agricultural sector. The lack of strategic documents that fully describe the economic profile of a community creates  uncertainty about its formalized specialization. To address this gap, an assessment was  made of the geographical factors that influence the formation of a territorial brand that  can stimulate development. The results of the study revealed a noticeable disproportion  in the levels of socio-economic development within the community: certain settlements,  including Kovalivka (the administrative center), Marianivka, Ustymivka, and Polohy,  demonstrate a much higher potential for both residential and business development,  which requires a differentiated approach to building the territory’s brand.

The scientific novelty lies primarily in the fact that the positioning of any territory involves  the use of previously developed materials that create conditions for the systematic  implementation of measures to increase the competitiveness of the community in both  local and regional markets. Geographical factors were selected taking into account  the fact that they determine the competitive advantages of a particular territory and  provide opportunities for achieving high efficiency in the relevant area. The practical  significance of the results obtained is primarily determined by the effectiveness for local  authorities involved in the development of strategic documents. In these conditions,  the task of the relevant developments that have been made is to maintain competitive  advantages in the areas of specialization of the territory. 

Author Biographies

  • Serhii Uliganets, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

    PhD (Geography), Associate Professor Department of Geography of Ukraine

  • Oleksandr Kramarenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

    PhD student at the Department of Geography of Ukraine

  • Ulyana Shynkarenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

    PhD student at the Department of Geography of Ukraine

References

1. Albalate, D., Bel, G., Mazaira‐Font, F. A. (2021). Geography and regional economic growth: The high cost of deviating from nature. Journal of Regional Science, 62(2), 360–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12568

2. Almeida, G. (2023). Territorial Brand in Regional Development: Interdisciplinary Discussions. Encyclopedia, 3(3), 870–886. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3030062

3. Anholt, S. (2002). Nation Branding: A continuing theme. Journal of Brand Management, 10(1), 59–60. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540101

4. Benovska, L. (2018). Territorial community as a subject of regulation of territorial development: Theoretical aspects. Regional Economy, 1, 30–39. http://jnas.nbuv.gov.ua/article/UJRN-0000969992 [in Ukrainian]

5. Bordenet, C. (2024). «Terroir washing »: les effets sociopolitiques de l’instrumentalisation accrue des territoires français par les marques. https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2024/10/11/terroir-washing-les-effets-sociopolitiques-de-l-instrumentalisation-accrue-des-territoires-francais-par-les-marques_6349147_3224.html

6. Boyarchuk, D., & Dabrowski, M. (2023). The Ukrainian war economy. Bruegel Working Paper 12/2023. https://www.bruegel.org/system/files/2023-07/WP%2012_0.pdf

7. Cashing in on rural France? That's terroir washing, firms told - Institut Terram. Institut Terram. https://institut-terram.org/medias/cashing-in-onrural-france-thats-terroir-washing-firmstold/

8. Cleave, E., Gilliland, J., Sadler R. (2016). The role of place branding in local and regional economic development: bridging the gap between policy and practicality. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3(1), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2016.1163506

9. Copernicus. Land Monitoring Service. https://land.copernicus.eu/en/products/global-dynamic-land-cover

10. Decentralization in Ukraine. https://decentralization.gov.ua/newrayons/1343

11. Dinnie, K. (2008). Nation Branding: Concepts, Issues, Practice

12. Dobryk, L. (2018). Preconditions and factors influencing the socio-economic development of a region. Bulletin of Cherkasy University. Series: Economic Sciences, 2, 3–11. [in Ukrainian]

13. Dyakonenko, O. (2023). Social capital of the territorial communities of Ukraine in the conditions of war: current transformations and forecasted changes. Demography and Social Economy, 52(2), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2023.02.054 [in Ukrainian]

14. FC Kolos Kovalivka. https://koloskovalivka.com/club/infrastructure/

15. Govers, R., & Go, F. (2009). Place Branding. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-24702-4

16. Haddad, E., et al. (2022). Input‐Output Analysis of the Ukraine War: A Tool for Assessing the Internal Territorial Impacts of the Conflict. Regional Science Policy & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12582

17. Jasnikowski, A. (2023). City branding as a tool for developing the territory competitiveness. Visnyk of Sumy State University. Economy Series, 7(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.21272/1817-9215.2023.1-04

18. Kyiv Regional Military Administration. https://koda.gov.ua/kiivshhina/rozvytok-regionu/strategiya-rozvytku/

19. Kochnev, A., Kosmehl, M., Landesmann, M., et al. (2023). Ukraine’s economic reconstruction - Addressing territorial inequalities, consolidating regional policy and reaping the benefits of EU integration. https://wiiw.ac.at/ukraine-s-economic-reconstruction-addressing-territorial-inequalities-consolidating-regional-policy-and-reaping-the-benefits-of-eu-integration-dlp-6718.pdf

20. Kovalivka territorial community – list of enterprises, companies and organizations. Opendatabot. https://opendatabot.ua/c/UA32020070000027895

21. Kotler, P., Haider, D., & Rein, I. (1993). Marketing Places: Attracting Investment, Industry, and Tourism to Cities, States, and Nations. New York: The Free Press.

22. Kuzmuk, O. (2018). Territorial branding as a tool for local development. Visnyk of Lviv University. Philosophical and Political Studies, 16, 156–161. https://fps-visnyk.lnu.lviv.ua/archive/16_2018/24.pdf [in Ukrainian]

23. Martin, E., & Capelli, S. (2018). Place brand communities: from terminal to instrumental values. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 27(7), 793–806. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-10-2017-1654

24. Montgomery, R. (2024). The role of geography in economic development: Insights from historical and modern perspectives [Preprint]. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202410.0006/v1

25. Nahorniak, T. (2014). Territorial branding as a direction of policy at the global, national and regional levels. Modern Society, 2, 106–121. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/cuc_2014_2_13 [in Ukrainian]

26. Oleksiuk, H., Popadynets, N., & Samotii, N. (2021). Management of territorial communities based on territorial marketing: Theoretical and methodological aspects. Regional Economy, 3, 15–27. http://jnas.nbuv.gov.ua/article/UJRN-0001335569 [in Ukrainian]

27. Official website of the Svitanok Agricultural Holding. https://agrofirma-svitanok.com.ua/pro-kompaniyu/

28. Official website of Kovalivka rural community. https://kovalivka-gromada.gov.ua/structure

29. OpenStreetMap. https://download.geofabrik.de/europe/ukraine.html

30. Patytska, K. (2024). Financial resilience of territorial communities during war: the role of tax revenues. Finance of Ukraine, 3, 95–115. https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2024.03.095

31. Ukraine Recovery Plan. https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/625d81ec8313622a52e2f031/62c19ac16c921fc712205f03_NRC%20Ukraine%27s%20Recovery%20Plan%20blueprint_UKR.pdf

32. Nationwide implementation of comprehensive spatial development plans for communities is planned to be postponed. Decentralization in Ukraine. https://decentralization.ua/news/19049

33. On voluntary amalgamation of territorial communities: Law of Ukraine No. 157-VIII (2015). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/157-19#Text

34. On approval of the State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 695 (2020). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/695-2020-п#Text

35. Redding, S., & Turner, M. (2015). Transportation Costs and the Spatial Organization of Economic Activity. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 1339–1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-59531-7.00020-x

36. Sych, V., Yavorska, V., Kolomiiets, K., & Hryhoriev, O. (2022). Territorial branding as a factor of socio-economic development of a region. Visnyk of Odesa National University. Geography and Geology Sciences, 26(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.18524/2303-9914.2021.2(39).246200 [in Ukrainian]

37. The implications for OECD regions of the war in Ukraine: An initial analysis. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2022/07/the-implications-for-oecd-regions-of-the-war-in-ukraine_09c96fae/8e0fcb83-en.pdf

38. Yevtushenko, A., Suslov, M., & Verba, S. (2021). Community branding is a mechanism for forming local identity and a factor of competitiveness. Public Administration and Regional Development, 13, 622–649. https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2021.13.04

39. Zubair, M., Zafar, Z., & Mehmood, M. (2025). Innovative GIS techniques for identifying optimal service center locations in Islamabad a PTCL case study. Discov Cities, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44327-025-00044-8

40. Zhuravel, V., Pospielov, O., Rekun, H., & Rodchenko, V. (2011). Regional economy. Kharkiv: KhNAMH [in Ukrainian]

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Geographical factors of territorial branding in local development strategy (on the example of Kovalivska rural community). (2026). Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Geology. Geography. Ecology, 64, 265-278. https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2026-64-20

Most read articles by the same author(s)